Jump to content

Orioles in 1st place


oldbird

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's hard to judge. I remember the Spring Eddie Murray had to make the team. I also remember many mirages.
    • I am definitely guilty of this. Just makes the spring more interesting if you think the stats matter when we all know they don't. The one thing that's worth paying attention to is injuries or physical changes, like a pitcher getting a bump in velocity. One example is when Britton showed up to camp throwing that 98 mph sinker and all of a sudden people started talking about him as closer. I was naturally skeptical but the spring speculation turned out absolutely correct in that case.  Of course, similar comments were made about Jason Garcia when we grabbed him in the Rule 5 the following year. Stuff like, "He throws 98 and the ball has a different sound when it hits the catcher's glove". We all remember how that turned out. 
    • I think they mean a little something, but it is more about the process. Mediocre or poor process can yield good results briefly, but it will be exposed when the season gets rolling. Spring training games are exhibition games to get the players ready for full speed and a regular season workload. You’d rather have good results, but it really doesn’t matter much. The coaches see the work that goes on behind the scenes, and that tells the bigger story.
    • Depends on the situation I suppose, and the track record of the player in question.  A vet who has proven himself to be good, or bad, isn't someone that I put a bunch of weight on their numbers, good or bad.  Two examples right now.  I don't really care about how good Burnes has looked or what his numbers currently are in the spring.  He's been one of the top pitchers in baseball for the past handful of years, and I trust he'll be fine.  At the same time I don't really care that Mateo has a .943 OPS this spring.  I've seen enough of him over the past few seasons to be fairly certain just what we have, and what we don't have, with him, so his spring training numbers don't really move me much.   Rookies are a bit different to me.  Unlike most 'vets', the rookies are still improving and have room to grow, so to speak.  They are also, in some cases, facing their first real taste of MLB pitching, though of course we know many of the pitchers in the spring will be in the milb come OD, and even the pitchers that are going to make the MLB teams aren't often on the top of their game or giving full effort.  But it still is the first real taste we get of them against something other than just their minor league peers.  Since they have a much smaller body of work than a vet, their spring training numbers tend to carry more weight with me simply as they don't have years of prior stats to either discount spring struggles or spring successes.   Spring training numbers need taken with a grain of salt, sure.  But just like most of us use SOME SSS numbers to help reinforce our thoughts and opinions, spring is the same way, SSS though with more volatility behind them, IMO.  
    • You could say that about any opinions expressed on this board, but what fun would that be?😉
    • Sometimes spring performance means something, sometimes it’s meaningless.  You kind of have to leave it to the professionals to determine which is which.  
    • Gunnar at SS and Holliday at 2B does make the most sense for the team.   Elias and Hyde agree,  IMO.   Of course, it will take another 5 years to prove it.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...