Jump to content

Hunter Harvey, stud


Frobby

Recommended Posts

First start in low A: 6 IP, 4 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 5 K's. 44 of his 55 pitches were strikes, and he had 8 ground outs to 2 fly outs. Yes you read correctly, he threw 55 pitches in 6 innings of work.

I guess I can't say he's too good for low A yet, but...WOW!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 212
  • Created
  • Last Reply
First start in low A: 6 IP, 4 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 5 K's. 44 of his 55 pitches were strikes, and he had 8 ground outs to 2 fly outs. Yes you read correctly, he threw 55 pitches in 6 innings of work.

I guess I can't say he's too good for low A yet, but...WOW!

Yes, he is stud in the making. One of my bold predictions for the minor league season is Hunter Harvey establishing himself at a Top 20 prospect in the game. Off to a great start!

Will never understand how he didn't go higher in the draft considering he had no college commitment. I though that alone at the time would have someone "reach" for him. Bet the Blue Jays wish they took at number 11 instead of Phil Bickford, who's now at Cal State Fullerton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is really impressive and I hope his father will continue to monitor him and stay in the picture. It's not warm yet and the weather apparently didn't bother him. He'll be at Frederick or Bowie by July if not sooner. Thanks for the details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are...He only threw 55 pitches in that start. That's how good of a start it was

But Bundy wasn't pitch count based. It was 3 innings, then building up to 4, then 5. Now obviously if his pitch count got elevated they wouldn't have let him go that long, but it was never more than that regardless.

I'm sure they're still monitoring him very closely though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Bundy wasn't pitch count based. It was 3 innings, then building up to 4, then 5. Now obviously if his pitch count got elevated they wouldn't have let him go that long, but it was never more than that regardless.

I'm sure they're still monitoring him very closely though.

Are you thinking they "shut off the valve" too quickly with Bundy in his starts and may have lead to the injury? Just curious...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you thinking they "shut off the valve" too quickly with Bundy in his starts and may have lead to the injury? Just curious...

I have no idea. I suspect that Bundy's injury would have happened regardless but it's impossible to tell.

Just noting that they are treating Hunter a little differently. Now maybe like Slade-OH mentioned he was just so efficient that they decided to let him go longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea. I suspect that Bundy's injury would have happened regardless but it's impossible to tell.

Just noting that they are treating Hunter a little differently. Now maybe like Slade-OH mentioned he was just so efficient that they decided to let him go longer.

Gotchya and I agree it does seem like a different approach on the face of it, but probably just pitch efficiency is the reasoning. Regardless, what a start! Have to admit I am getting excited about the possibility of three potential 1/2 starters in our rotation in the near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So why aren't they giving Hunter the Bundy treatment? 3 innings to start and building up? New regime? Felt it didn't help Bundy?

Harvey pitched towards the end of last season, whereas Bundy was basically inactive from June on in his draft year. In fact, Harvey actually threw less innings in his first eight pro starts than Bundy.

Harvey also doesn't have the same concerns with workload that Bundy did -- rather, thanks to his father's pro background, he was very well managed through high school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ph_640451.jpg

Imagine the projection if they could get him a sammich or two in him!

That's really what is so exciting about him. He has a nice frame to add some mass too and with that should come a tick or two or three on an already plus fastball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harvey pitched towards the end of last season, whereas Bundy was basically inactive from June on in his draft year. In fact, Harvey actually threw less innings in his first eight pro starts than Bundy.

Harvey also doesn't have the same concerns with workload that Bundy did -- rather, thanks to his father's pro background, he was very well managed through high school.

wish somebody had looked out for Ben McDonald when he was in college and overused his arm. One could only image what he could have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wish somebody had looked out for Ben McDonald when he was in college and overused his arm. One could only image what he could have been.

It would be really hard to show that McDonald's college career impacted his pro career. He'd thrown about 1,000 pro innings before he got hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Take this how you want it, but Schoop was up here for 1: a lack of better options, and 2: because despite the fact that he was an offensive zero in 2014, his defense was almost good enough to make him a passable regular despite that.  It's hard to call him rushed if he's providing positive value.   A second point of nuance that I'll bring up is that it might be worth considering minor league park effects.  This was pre-Walltimore, and pre-baseball change to the MLB baseball.  The park effects in Norfolk were so severe that for hitters, your MLE OPS was almost identical to your actual OPS.  So while his Norfolk numbers weren't great, the awful hitting environment there suggested that he might be ready for Major League pitching anyway.  (He probably wasn't, but again, lack of better options.)   If Holliday ends up being a +10 or +12 runs above average defender over the course of a whole year (and he very well might be, his OAA is already far above average) then you probably live with a .600 OPS from him, especially considering how big of a black hole 2B has been for the past 2 years.  But of course he's far below that threshold at this point.   I don't think any of this indicates that Holliday was rushed.  Machado had worse minor league numbers than Holliday at close to the same age, skipping AAA all together despite only putting an 850ish OPS there, and Machado put up a 1.3 wins in 1/3 season and 5 wins in his first full season.
    • Whether he was rushed or merely expedited or accelerated, he made his debut at a very young age with very little minor league experience, and the results thus far have been terrible. 
    • I think you're basically right, probability-wise.  That said, almost no one thought Kjerstad coming up today was the move they were going to make. So... you never really know with Mike and roster moves. But I agree, it's tough to figure out how he stays if Mounty is healthy when Hays comes back. 
    • But he's 82nd percentile in barrel percentage and 92nd percentile in Whiff. I saw some some high EVs that were hit at 60 degree angles or more which were pop ups. I'm not saying he's a long term piece. I'd need to see it for longer than two starts, but I like the stuff overall, especially if he can get his curveball over more often to give another look to the change and cutter.
    • The rookie is a #2 overall selection, now 25 years old, who battled back from missing significant time with non-baseball related illness, was called up last season but had mostly sit behind a mediocre performing veteran (Hays), and is performing better at the minor league levels than Hays ever did. But, I guess he hasn’t paid his dues and is just temporarily holding a spot for the guy who was fortunate enough to come up when he was much younger and the organization was in bad shape.
    • Simmer down...  Just because you've got it all figured out doesn't mean I do.
    • by all means bet the house and the student loans
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...