Jump to content

Computers should call balls and strikes and baseball is an institution of anachronism


Barnaby Graves

Recommended Posts

With cameras and technology and solid state drives and the transistor radio and penicillin, by this point, it's technologically feasible to track a baseball. It happens all the time. For several years now I have been able to use MLB gameday to see exactly where a pitch was during each millisecond of its life.

So how come umpires can't do that?

Let's pretend every single person in the world has a cell phone tuned through the internet to watch an Orioles game on MLB Gameday. Every single person except the home plate umpire who just happens to be C.B. Bucknor.

So here comes the pitch and it's a strike. It's a strike but the catcher had to move his glove to get the ball. He framed it on the lower outside corner, it came in high and inside but low and behold, according to the rules of baseball, it was a strike.

But C.B. Bucknor saw the catcher move his glove to catch the ball. Therefore the pitcher did not do his job and it was a ball.

Think this is unrealistic? This happens all the time and it's terrible. In fact even if you disagree with my premise you've seen this kind of thing happen and you know I'm not making it up. And it's garbage.

I don't care if one team is winning by 20, or Greg Maddux is pitching to some douchebag rookie, strikes and balls should follow the rigid rules set forth by the rulebook. There should be no room for negotiation. It degrades the integrity of the game to give wiggle room. But before, we could realistically say, it's impossible to call balls and strikes because technology is not there.

But we cannot say that anymore. The only reason not to get things right is laziness. I'm ready for the robots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's the one Palmer said "isn't a good umpire, and never has been," right?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I remember several years back there was a game (playing the Jays I think?) where Bucknor missed at least 20 pitches per Pitch FX. Like almost 10% of what was thrown in that game. It was absolutely ridiculous.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • We’ll always have the no-hitter…
    • Do we know what his velocity was today? I know he doesn't light up the gun but was he at his normal? 
    • Longterm he’s probably that missing RH SU/MR that we’ve been looking for since the Fuji trade.  It’s probably Suarez vs Ramírez vs Tate for 1-2 bullpen spots. Wells and one of Irvin/Means could be in the bullpen mix as well.  Depth is good to have. I wouldn’t sleep on Ramirez either. Elias has shown a knack from adding relievers through trade or waivers. 
    • There's not a single high level prospect on the team he pitched against tonight and even the one out he got was crushed
    • Let’s tap the brakes on his move to the bullpen. His stuff plays and he can get outs. Best of all, he doesn’t walk anyone. He challenges hitters and gets weak contact. With our defense, I’d rather him give up the occasional double or flared hit to the outfield than to see walks. Keep him in the starting rotation until he proves he doesn’t belong. Wells and Irvin both have experience in the pen and frankly for Irvin, though I love him, has a real tough time throwing strikes at times.    anyway, let’s see what the old dog can do.
    • I could see Suarez sticking in a bullpen role long term with the movement on his fastball. Also he might be able to throw a 2 to 3 more MPH harder not having to worry about trying to pitch six innings. The Orioles have done a good job finding pitchers who weren't expected to do much in recent years and it would be cool if Suarez is another find.
    • I mean, heres where we really find out if Holliday is cut out for the majors and if he has the character to fight through major adversity right off the bat right?  Saw a good point that there was a guy previously that started 4 of 55, and that was ole #8.  Mike Trout didnt get his batting average up to .200 until May 31st of his first season.  Ideal? Absolutely not.  But when the franchises all-time hits leader started with the same slump its something to pay attention to.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...