Jump to content

Draft selections


Recommended Posts

Anyone else find the O's choices so far a bit mystifying? Through the 26th round we have only picked 4 position players. Not sure of their thinking but guess they have a plan. If I am a pitcher still in Instructs back in Florida though I might be getting a bit nervous about my future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else find the O's choices so far a bit mystifying? Through the 26th round we have only picked 4 position players. Not sure of their thinking but guess they have a plan. If I am a pitcher still in Instructs back in Florida though I might be getting a bit nervous about my future.

I guess we are following the Cardinals model these days. Pitching, Pitching, More pitching, and then pitching again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duh, we're obviously drafting all this pitching because we're getting ready to make a big splash on position players when the international market starts up. :laughlol:

I would not expect that. No. I just don;t think we see value is space fillers at the low minor league level. It's a change from the days when we drafted utility infielders. I assume that we feel that we can always just claim one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not impressed with this draft at all , only pick I like that looks half decent is the pitcher out o ND Pat Connaughton . I think missing out until pick 90 really through them really off this year . I kind of expected it though , really surprised they went so pitcher heavy that's for sure .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree should of been taking shots at HS players with our late round picks or at least guys with some high upside, looks like we took a lot of 22- 23 year olds that are relief pitchers or utility guys in the big leagues at best.smh

We had a total of 4.3 million that we could spend on this draft. That's to sign 27 players. Figure out how many over slots you could get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if you took 10 and only signed five , long as they would of had higher upside than the ones we took.

You do realize that we get to dangle the great sum of 100,000 dollars at them to keep them from going to college. Right? They can't relly lose by going to school if they are really prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rajisch talks about the O's draft.

Most important, the O's landed players who ranked highly on their own Draft board.

After snagging Gonzalez , the Orioles kept landing players they were surprised to see still on the board when their turn came around.

With a major haul of promising pitchers -- and ones that are more frequently in their early 20s than late teens -- the O's attacked their most glaring weakness with a bunch that could make its way to the Majors faster than the average Draft class.

"We didn't count on getting the four or five first guys that we got," Rajsich said. "We thought we'd get maybe one or two, so we're extremely satisfied with what we were able to get."

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article/bal/baltimore-orioles-follow-through-on-plan-to-restock-arms?ymd=20140607&content_id=78688884&vkey=news_bal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>O's scouting dir. Gary Rajisch said club is close 2 signing several picks. Some top 10 rounders it appears. More on MASN pregame 2 day.</p>— Steve Melewski (@masnSteve) <a href="

">June 8, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Still a lot of things to shake out this year that IMO affects this decision.   1. Is Silent J the heir apparent to RF? 2. Is Beavers taking the next step and showing as a viable starting OF? 3. Is Fabian taking the next step to be a legit 4th OF who can play all 3 positions?   I will be very surprised if Taters is on the team next year. Honestly I think that if he is it will be due to failure of the young guys to show out. Good thing for us is we have enough of them that I don’t think that will happen.
    • He said after the game that he has five pitches, and if any three of them are working on a given night, he can mix them up enough to get batters out.  
    • He’s had quite the turnaround vs. LHP on this road trip.  Hopefully it continues all year!
    • Gunnar's definitely looking like the MVP of the Orioles and looks like priority #1 to me to get an extension. Burnes age works against him, because the O's maybe don't want to go longer than 5-6 years at most, but I could be wrong there. The Witt extension kind of set the parameters of what Gunnar will probably want at minimum. 2025 25 Kansas City Royals $8,111,111     2026 26 Kansas City Royals $14,111,111     2027 27 Kansas City Royals $20,111,111     2028 28 Kansas City Royals $31,111,111     2029 29 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2030 30 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2031 31 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2032 32 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2033 33 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2034 34 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2035 35 Kansas City Royals *$33,000,000   $33M Team Option 2036 36 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team Option 2037 37 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team
    • It is probably thin because of the short career lifespan is for those positions, which is why there is no way Mullins should be extended.
    • Gunnar Henderson's splits through first 97 ABs of the season:   Home -- .326 / .385 / .630 Away -- .294 / .362 / .667 Vs. LH -- .324 / .395 / .622 Vs. RH -- .300 / .358 / .667
    • I don't think the point was to trash Holliday but to question the reliability of the metric. I share the question about Holliday's OAA. He hasn't been bad but I can't think of a single plus play and OAA thinks he is the best defender on the team.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...