Jump to content

More pitchers than we have spots for?


Recommended Posts

Seriously, we've already drafted 20 pitchers before Round 30 -- where do you put them all?

Well, since we are low on money, I guess the fact that multiple targets are available makes the negotiation process much easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will have three of them in the outfield, one at first, another at third, maybe one at second.

Our first pick is a 1B by trade.....maybe do a reverse Mychal Givens on another......it's also possible we won't sign them all...;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, since we are low on money, I guess the fact that multiple targets are available makes the negotiation process much easier.

Why would the team be low on money? This is one of the more profitable franchises in the majors w/a sweetheart deal w/MASN. They're not the Yankees, but they're not the A's either(BTW I wish the O's were half as good at drafting as Oakland is w/a lot less money). Money shouldn't be an issue w/the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would the team be low on money? This is one of the more profitable franchises in the majors w/a sweetheart deal w/MASN. They're not the Yankees, but they're not the A's either(BTW I wish the O's were half as good at drafting as Oakland is w/a lot less money). Money shouldn't be an issue w/the O's.

I will take this nice and slow, try and follow along.

The owners and the players union engage in what is called collective bargaining.

The last time this occurred the two sides agreed to cap the amount that could be spent on draftees.

The amount that each team can spend is dependent upon how many and when their picks fall.

The O's traded their supplemental draft pick last summer for Bud Norris.

They forfeited their first round pick when they signed Ubaldo Jimenez.

They forfeited their second round pick when they signed Nelson Cruz.

With no picks before the third round the O's allotment of money to be used on draft picks "pool money" is the lowest of the thirty teams.

Teams can go beyond the stated allotment but since the penalties are based on the percentage over the pool they go over, the O's have less flexibility in going over the pool of any team.

Understand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will take this nice and slow, try and follow along.

The owners and the players union engage in what is called collective bargaining.

The last time this occurred the two sides agreed to cap the amount that could be spent on draftees.

The amount that each team can spend is dependent upon how many and when their picks fall.

The O's traded their supplemental draft pick last summer for Bud Norris.

They forfeited their first round pick when they signed Ubaldo Jimenez.

They forfeited their second round pick when they signed Nelson Cruz.

With no picks before the third round the O's allotment of money to be used on draft picks "pool money" is the lowest of the thirty teams.

Teams can go beyond the stated allotment but since the penalties are based on the percentage over the pool they go over, the O's have less flexibility in going over the pool of any team.

Understand?

I understand you're not mature enough to make your point without being a condescending pr**k

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will take this nice and slow, try and follow along.

The owners and the players union engage in what is called collective bargaining.

The last time this occurred the two sides agreed to cap the amount that could be spent on draftees.

The amount that each team can spend is dependent upon how many and when their picks fall.

The O's traded their supplemental draft pick last summer for Bud Norris.

They forfeited their first round pick when they signed Ubaldo Jimenez.

They forfeited their second round pick when they signed Nelson Cruz.

With no picks before the third round the O's allotment of money to be used on draft picks "pool money" is the lowest of the thirty teams.

Teams can go beyond the stated allotment but since the penalties are based on the percentage over the pool they go over, the O's have less flexibility in going over the pool of any team.

Understand?

But the O's reached for so many guys in rounds 3-10 that it's hard to see them even spending their allotment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand you're not mature enough to make your point without being a condescending pr**k

:D

Well if you can't be bothered to keep up with the draft and instead want to ignorantly attack the team's willingness to spend money then yea, I don't mind having a bit of fun at your expense.

If you had simply asked about the money, instead of going on a mini-rant about MASN then I would have been glad to help without the added snark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the O's reached for so many guys in rounds 3-10 that it's hard to see them even spending their allotment.

Any money from the pool not spent on the first ten can be spent on any pick(s) after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Well it certainly doesn't look like he'll be winning Rookie of Year award. And if we send him down for like the tiniest amount of time, we get him for another year, right? I think if this poor hitting continues it's financial mismanagement not to send him back down. Grayson got sent down and came back way better.
    • He certainly isn't a bust but I wasn't happy with the pick at the time and I don't love using the second overall pick for that type of player profile. Westburg signed for slot so he's irrelevant but Mayo was a great use of the money saved.
    • Think Heston will be the next call up. Mayo’s K/BB ratio is poor and I think they’ll want to see that even out. Stowers and Norby have seen their numbers slip a bit.  It will likely take an injury to an outfielder or first baseman, but I think we see HK next. 
    • I have to laugh at some of my pre-draft thoughts as well as others. I will say on behalf of myself and some others is that what we did not understand then was what the Orioles brain trust knew to be their model, and what they best developed. What traits they were looking for is an important thing to know, in hindsight anyway. And really, the Jackson Holliday leap in development was not something most of us heard anything about until about a month before the draft. I saw him the previous summer and I cannot say he was all that impressive, but it was only one look. His physicality took a big jump after that.  I will also add that we’re never going to know what would have happened if they drafted Austin Martin, Jones, Lawler, Lacy, etc. Their development could well have been different as O’s. The funny part of this board, in general, is the absolute certainty some have in their opinions and how eager they are to trash Elias and staff. There is plenty of humility to go around, now that things have played out. It’s fun to finally have a truly great front office and ownership group, and a stacked stable of horses. 
    • How did the moustache work for Austin Hays?
    • Thanks for the kind words @HbgOsFan and thanks especially for reading them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...