Jump to content

Boog Powell


CP0861

Recommended Posts

Why isn't his number retired?

I was looking over the retired numbers at a game recently.....and got to thinking.....why isn't Boog's number retired? He played in the glory days of Orioles Magic....put up huge numbers.....won an MVP (and finished 2nd in 1969 and 3rd in 1966).

Boog has been a fixture at OPACY since it opened, and I've had my picture taken with him and gotten his autograph on several occasions over the years, and he was always happy to do it....he's been gracious to fans and always has a smile on his face. Seems like a genuine great guy.

I realize he's not in the HOF as the others are, but is that the only reason?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why isn't his number retired?

I was looking over the retired numbers at a game recently.....and got to thinking.....why isn't Boog's number retired? He played in the glory days of Orioles Magic....put up huge numbers.....won an MVP (and finished 2nd in 1969 and 3rd in 1966).

Boog has been a fixture at OPACY since it opened, and I've had my picture taken with him and gotten his autograph on several occasions over the years, and he was always happy to do it....he's been gracious to fans and always has a smile on his face. Seems like a genuine great guy.

I realize he's not in the HOF as the others are, but is that the only reason?

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20140707&content_id=83514588&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb&sid=milb' rel="external nofollow">

Because he tested positive for amphetamines and suspended 50 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why isn't his number retired?

I was looking over the retired numbers at a game recently.....and got to thinking.....why isn't Boog's number retired? He played in the glory days of Orioles Magic....put up huge numbers.....won an MVP (and finished 2nd in 1969 and 3rd in 1966).

Boog has been a fixture at OPACY since it opened, and I've had my picture taken with him and gotten his autograph on several occasions over the years, and he was always happy to do it....he's been gracious to fans and always has a smile on his face. Seems like a genuine great guy.

I realize he's not in the HOF as the others are, but is that the only reason?

Seriously, the Legend's Park is only for HOF Orioles. Ones with Orioles caps on their plaques. Same with retired numbers so far. I could see that changing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, the Legend's Park is only for HOF Orioles. Ones with Orioles caps on their plaques. Same with retired numbers so far. I could see that changing.

is that the orioles "official" policy? or just coincidence that they have only retired the numbers of HOF orioles? It was decades ago, but I think Frank Robinson's number was retired while he was still an active player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is that the orioles "official" policy? or just coincidence that they have only retired the numbers of HOF orioles? It was decades ago, but I think Frank Robinson's number was retired while he was still an active player.

Per wikipedia:

The Orioles will only retire a number when a player has been inducted into the Hall of Fame, but have placed moratoriums on other former Orioles's numbers following their deaths (see note below).

Note: Cal Ripken, Sr.'s number 7, Elrod Hendricks' number 44 and Mike Flanagan's number 46 have not been retired, but a moratorium has been placed on them and they have not been issued by the team since their deaths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, HOF'ers only.

I did think it was a little strange, though, that at Eddie Murray's statue ceremony, just about every speaker made a point of emphasizing how Eddie was the best firstbaseman in franchise history, while Boog Powell sat 10 feet away. I mean, sure, Eddie was the best, but you know Boog had to be thinking, "wait, my teams won two World Series, I was the league MVP, I was beloved and they ran him out of town, etc."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>*Kramer's moviefone voice* "well why don't you just tell me what number isn't retired"</p>— Brandon McCarthy (@BMcCarthy32) <a href="

">July 8, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, HOF'ers only.

I did think it was a little strange, though, that at Eddie Murray's statue ceremony, just about every speaker made a point of emphasizing how Eddie was the best firstbaseman in franchise history, while Boog Powell sat 10 feet away. I mean, sure, Eddie was the best, but you know Boog had to be thinking, "wait, my teams won two World Series, I was the league MVP, I was beloved and they ran him out of town, etc."

Yeah....between Eddie Murray playing 1st more recently than Boog and having a HOF career (partially spent with other teams), and Frank Robinson becoming the face of the team during their late 60's and early 70's dominance (even though Frank only played 6 years with the Orioles)....I think Boog has gotten a raw deal. Retiring his number should be a no brainer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, HOF'ers only.

I did think it was a little strange, though, that at Eddie Murray's statue ceremony, just about every speaker made a point of emphasizing how Eddie was the best firstbaseman in franchise history, while Boog Powell sat 10 feet away. I mean, sure, Eddie was the best, but you know Boog had to be thinking, "wait, my teams won two World Series, I was the league MVP, I was beloved and they ran him out of town, etc."

I felt the same discomfort for Boog. He was a good man to have kept smiling through it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah....between Eddie Murray playing 1st more recently than Boog and having a HOF career (partially spent with other teams), and Frank Robinson becoming the face of the team during their late 60's and early 70's dominance (even though Frank only played 6 years with the Orioles)....I think Boog has gotten a raw deal. Retiring his number should be a no brainer.

What isn't a no-brainer is figuring out where to draw the line. Depending on the criteria, you could also make a case for Cuellar, McNally, Belanger, Blair, Singleton, and Gentile, just to mention a few.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't retire everyones number. And when the league randomly retires a players number once already I think you need to limit the guys who get retired numbers. If you retire Boog what about Cuellar and McNally? Belanger and Blair?

You can honor Boog somewhere around the stadium without retiring his number. Name some area of the stadium after him. Make a special plaque near his barbecue. Have a Boog Powell day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What isn't a no-brainer is figuring out where to draw the line. Depending on the criteria, you could also make a case for Cuellar, McNally, Belanger, Blair, Singleton, and Gentile, just to mention a few.

valid.....and just goes to show how rich the team's history is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't retire everyones number.

yeah, obviously everyone realizes that.

but to only retire the numbers of the guys in the HOF seems snooty to me. as dominant as the team was in the 60's and 70's you've got 3 players from that era recognized. The Orioles are an old and storied franchise....why not recognize a few more guys?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, obviously everyone realizes that.

but to only retire the numbers of the guys in the HOF seems snooty to me. as dominant as the team was in the 60's and 70's you've got 3 players from that era recognized. The Orioles are an old and storied franchise....why not recognize a few more guys?

Nah, retired numbers are for the best of the best. I scoff at teams like the Astros who have retired numbers for guys like Jimmy Winn, Jos? Cruz and Larry Dierker. Only 8 teams have retired the number more than one non Hall of Fame player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, obviously everyone realizes that.

but to only retire the numbers of the guys in the HOF seems snooty to me. as dominant as the team was in the 60's and 70's you've got 3 players from that era recognized. The Orioles are an old and storied franchise....why not recognize a few more guys?

They do, they call it the Oriole Hall of Fame.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltimore_Orioles_Hall_of_Fame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • My God, was your oral history book about the O's really 25 years ago?   That makes me feel really old. It was a fantastic book, I treasure it and revisit it often.   You can just jump into the middle of any section of Orioles history and read a few pages and find something interesting. It was one of my primary references when I did this little thread as a project to make the 2017-2018 offseason go by faster:  
    • Hitters can sit on the fastball and still can’t square it up when he keeps it up.  That’s a good fastball.   He seems to lose command when he starts getting tired which seems to be at 75-80 pitches. By the way, he seems like our best fielding pitcher, better than GG winner Burnes.
    • I think you're underestimating the value of an OPS around .800 in the current offensive environment. From a quick glance at BB Ref, it looks like Santander was 6th in OPS in all of baseball among players whose primary position was RF (a couple of spots lower if you include guys who spent time in RF, but it wasn't their primary position). I think Cowser and HK both have the potential to exceed that, but it's certainly not a given that one or both actually does so, especially this year.
    • Fact: John Eisenberg is one of the greatest sports writers in Baltimore history. Opinion: Eisenberg was always my favorite. Fact: He's working on a new project! Opinion: It's gotta be amazing.
    • What does this have to do with my statements? Are you excited over his start? It's ok to be disappointed in a player's start and not give up on him at all. I just will never understand why some of you feel like you need to say "there's nothing to see here" without providing any context or statistical backing. What the hell is up with the snarky lol? That's the kind of BS that pisses me off.  Basically, you are showing your fanboy status when do stuff like this. This is the Hangout. we make observations and then we back things up with pertinent stats or information. If you wanna be all fanboy and "lol" posts that give facts because the fanboy in you wants to say, "there's nothing to see here," save your typing. That kind of stuff really rubs me wrong especially when I deserve a lot more respect than you loling a factual post.  If you want to be snarky, don't do it my posts. That's disrespectful and BS.
    • Take this how you want it, but Schoop was up here for 1: a lack of better options, and 2: because despite the fact that he was an offensive zero in 2014, his defense was almost good enough to make him a passable regular despite that.  It's hard to call him rushed if he's providing positive value.   A second point of nuance that I'll bring up is that it might be worth considering minor league park effects.  This was pre-Walltimore, and pre-baseball change to the MLB baseball.  The park effects in Norfolk were so severe that for hitters, your MLE OPS was almost identical to your actual OPS.  So while his Norfolk numbers weren't great, the awful hitting environment there suggested that he might be ready for Major League pitching anyway.  (He probably wasn't, but again, lack of better options.)   If Holliday ends up being a +10 or +12 runs above average defender over the course of a whole year (and he very well might be, his OAA is already far above average) then you probably live with a .600 OPS from him, especially considering how big of a black hole 2B has been for the past 2 years.  But of course he's far below that threshold at this point.   I don't think any of this indicates that Holliday was rushed.  Machado had worse minor league numbers than Holliday at close to the same age, skipping AAA all together despite only putting an 850ish OPS there, and Machado put up a 1.3 wins in 1/3 season and 5 wins in his first full season.
    • Whether he was rushed or merely expedited or accelerated, he made his debut at a very young age with very little minor league experience, and the results thus far have been terrible. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...