Jump to content

Giants vs. Royals


Uli2001

Who Wins?  

4 members have voted

  1. 1. Who Wins?

    • SF in 4
      0
    • SF in 5
      0
    • SF in 6
    • SF in 7
      0
    • KC in 4
      0
    • KC in 5
      0
    • KC in 6
      0
    • KC in 7
      0


Recommended Posts

Giants are up 3-1 on the Cardinals, so that series is pretty much done.

Who do you like in the World Series, Giants or Royals?

The Royals play old-school baseball, they can catch the ball and put it in play. They play as a team. With that said, SF has the pedigree and the experience in the World Series. If things don't go right out of the gate for the Royals, they may not be able to overcome it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants are up 3-1 on the Cardinals, so that series is pretty much done.

Who do you like in the World Series, Giants or Royals?

The Royals play old-school baseball, they can catch the ball and put it in play. They play as a team. With that said, SF has the pedigree and the experience in the World Series. If things don't go right out of the gate for the Royals, they may not be able to overcome it.

That's part of my worry as well. Really, not saying this to be an ass, but they still haven't experienced losing in the postseason. It's a very young team that's been on such a high I don't think they've even realized what's going on in a way. When they lose and feel a little bit of pressure...who knows. Could be down hill from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go, Giants!! I am so sick of Royals being media darlings. During the final Os/Royals game, the TBS announcers were so 1-sided, favoring the Royals; the might as well have used the regular Royals announcers.

I saw somebody else make this comment, and I agree, that it almost seemed as if they were trying too hard to not be one-sided towards the O's that it turned into no emotion at all or praising the Royals even more than they typically would. You know Cal had to be cheering for the O's, but he's not supposed to show it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's part of my worry as well. Really, not saying this to be an ass, but they still haven't experienced losing in the postseason. It's a very young team that's been on such a high I don't think they've even realized what's going on in a way. When they lose and feel a little bit of pressure...who knows. Could be down hill from there.

Agreed, that is my point precisely. They haven't experienced adversity in the postseason, not this year, not for many years. They really don't know what they are doing, nor how difficult this is. They just hope it keeps going. This is a bit like the Ravens first SB run, for the team and the fans. The second SB run was very different, because the Ravens had already faced adversity and defeat in the postseason. In a sense, it was a more satisfying run than the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants are up 3-1 on the Cardinals, so that series is pretty much done.

Who do you like in the World Series, Giants or Royals?

The Royals play old-school baseball, they can catch the ball and put it in play. They play as a team. With that said, SF has the pedigree and the experience in the World Series. If things don't go right out of the gate for the Royals, they may not be able to overcome it.

The Giants are the one NL team that I think can actually beat the unbeatable KC Royals jauggernaut. They are a well rounded team. However, it would not surprise me if KC continues their roll and wins four straight one run games including at least one extra inning affair. I do think though that if the Giants can win the first game, it might knock them off their haughty pedestal and bring them back to earth. I wouldn't mind KC winning so much if not for their haughty attitude/swagger where they act much like Boston, when in reality they have been winning these games frequently (as in the last two) by the slimest of threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont really care and wont be watching. When does spring training start?

But as some have posted, the attitudes of the players and fans in KC is something you would like to see squashed and all of them humbled.

I don't think the lucky team will win a game.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only World Series I basically haven't watched in the last 35 years or so was the Indians/Marlins series in '97. This will probably be the second. That said I will be rooting for K.C. At least we can then say, hey, nobody else could beat them either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind the Royals winning. In fact, I think I'll still root for them to win despite their elimination of us. They're a gutsy team. And I'm tired of the Giants (and Cardinals) in the World Series.

But I still hope Jerrod Dyson goes 0-10. And gets picked off of first three times.

And yeah, I hope Guthrie loses the game he pitches. Yes, because of the t-shirt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • In 4 out of the next 9 we will face a LH starting pitcher. So there should be plenty of playing time to go around for him especially if he is going to start against lefties. Because those will be games that O'Hearn doesn't play and you gotta imagine that Mullins will sit a day or 2 against at least some of the Yanks tough lefties (Rodon and Cortez).
    • Maybe, but not if they DH Adley vs LHP, which they’ve continued to do a lot this year. If so, he’s not going to take the LH ABs from Cowser or Mullins because that means putting Kjerstad in the field somewhere and massively downgrading the defense. Otherwise Kjerstad is just replacing Mountcastle or Santander vs LHP, so not really a different consideration for playing time than when facing RHP. So hopefully Kjerstad can pick up some ABs vs LHP from O’Hearn at DH when Adley stays at C or gets a full day off, but I don’t expect that too often.
    • We know that there will have to be tough roster decisions with this team in the near future. Is the plan to put those off until the offseason no matter what? If that's the plan, you might see a rationale for keeping the status quo. At the same time, I'd be fine with making one or two of those decisions by the deadline. But let's be honest here, you're talking about the risk with one player (Norby) by making the change I'm saying to make. It's not going to derail the future of this team or even his trade value.  At the same time, I think they're doing Holliday a disservice. He only played 36 games in AA, and half that in AAA, last year. They didn't even give those leagues the chance to adjust to him. I really, honestly, think they've rushed the kid. I think he's showing that he's not ready offensively, or even defensively at 2B. Heck, I think he's overhyped in general even though I definitely see him eventually as an above average 2B and top of the league leadoff hitter. But he's not the uber athlete, big powerful MOO bat that someone like a Gunnar is. He's more of Jeter profile. That's wonderful, but it's not an ARod profile either and Jeter did what he did with 10/10 intangibles. I think there's more to gain by getting the extra year of service time and making sure he's ready, and I think that way outweighs the risks of losing some value on a guy like Norby.
    • Ideally, sure, but in a situation where you assume that you're only getting 5-6 years from that player before he leaves, I can understand trying to manage their time so that you get the maximum impact out of it.
    • yea McCann has been hot but eventually I would hope to see a better lineup vs lefties. I don't think they will DH Adley all year against them and have Cowser and Mullins play and use a different DH 
    • Do you think that Mountcastle could land us a frontline starting pitcher? Otherwise, there's really no use in trading him. He has been one of the best hitters on the team and is still relatively young. Also, it might take trading Norby AND Stowers to get back a difference making starting pitcher. Would you be comfortable with that? Or do you think it would be better for him to be the 10th - 12th hitter on the team next year. I ask because with so many top level talents/potential star players, the need or use for 10- 12 bench players is not that high (think ATL Braves). However, we are one more top notch starter (especially once Bradish returns) from being the best team in baseball bar none. Plus, if we are not going to resign Burnes, we will need someone up at or near the top of the rotation next season (even if Bradish is there and healthy) if we want to put ourselves in the best position possible to win it all.
    • I think most people’s minds are conditioned that a player has to play everyday. We don’t see teams playing a lot of guys some. We see teams that normally put out the same lineups everyday and play the same players most of the time. But the reality is that shouldn’t be the case.    We also don’t need young guys to come up and play every single day to justify them being here.  They can play 2-4 times a week and get PH appearances.  When the player is “old enough” and has nothing left to prove in the minors, you get them up here even if it’s just on a part time basis for a while until things get figured out.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...