Jump to content

Nelson Cruz Officially Declines Orioles Qualifying Offer (and 3 yr deal?)


Slade-OH

Recommended Posts

As many expected, Nelson Cruz declined the Orioles $15.3 million qualifying offer this afternoon, electing to become a free agent. This shouldn't come as a surprise as both parties knew what they were signing up for back in February when the O's inked Cruz to a 1-year deal worth $8 million. Cruz offered the Orioles another power bat and run producer in the middle of the order at a clearance rack price. The Orioles offered Cruz, desperate for a suitor at that point, a one-year opportunity to re-establish his free agent value, coming off a season that ended in a PED-related suspension.

It proved to be the perfect situation for both Cruz and the Orioles. Nelson fit right in with the Baltimore Orioles and hammered a career-best and MLB-leading 40 home runs along with an impressive .271/.333/.525 slash line and a 2014 MLB all-star game appearance. He proved to be a pivotal part of the Orioles first AL East title since

was relevant music (1997). I'd say the mission was accomplished by Cruz's camp as he shouldn't have nearly as difficult of time finding that lucrative contract he has been seeking this offseason.

Both sides have expressed interest in keeping Cruz in Baltimore but it's certainly possible that his price tag becomes too high for what the Orioles are realistically willing to offer on the free agent market. After all, Cruz does turn 35 next July, so it's reasonable to assume that his future production may not quite approach the level he played at in 2014. If he does end up signing elsewhere, the Orioles will at least recieve a supplemental 2015 draft pick out of the deal.

Is the short-lived Nelson Cruz era over? Or do you think the Orioles will work out a deal to keep him in Baltimore for several more seasons? Are you willing to give him a 4-year deal if that's the selling point in securing his services for the O's? Are there other free agents you would rather see the Orioles pursue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 203
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest rochester
But he worked for a very team friendly deal last year. How smart is that? What if he had not stayed healthy?

Smarter than waiting until August, IMO.:o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>The Orioles offered Nelson Cruz a three-year deal before he went into free agency. They're positioned to wait out as he talks w/ other teams</p>— Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) <a href="

">November 11, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>The Orioles offered Nelson Cruz a three-year deal before he went into free agency. They're positioned to wait out as he talks w/ other teams</p>? Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) <a href="
">November 11, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

C'mon Buster. Give us the dollars.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>The Orioles offered Nelson Cruz a three-year deal before he went into free agency. They're positioned to wait out as he talks w/ other teams</p>— Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) <a href="
">November 11, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Dan Duquette said that he had payroll flexibility to sign both Cruz and Markakis if he decide to. Says they are not mutually exclusive.

https://twitter.com/dc_tbldaily/status/532267004569587712

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they even considering Miller? I thought not. No one has indicated any interest.

We would have won the division without Miller, I'm pretty sure. But it was great to have him down the stretch and in the postseason. I think it may be more prudent to pick up an extra reliever for the stretch run than it is to commit to a $25-32 mm outlay over 3-4 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real point I was trying to make is that of our free agents I would rank Markakis MUCH lower than Miller or Cruz. These two are/can be difference makers. At this point in his career, Nick is basically a full time Joe Orsulak.

Andrew Miller has been an above average reliever for a single season in his career. His career walk rate is almost 5. I like Andrew Miller but he is probably going to be among the 15 best paid relievers in baseball and it is possible that he falls off a cliff. I think Markakis is a safer bet than Miller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew Miller has been an above average reliever for a single season in his career. His career walk rate is almost 5. I like Andrew Miller but he is probably going to be among the 15 best paid relievers in baseball and it is possible that he falls off a cliff. I think Markakis is a safer bet than Miller.

It's possible he continues like last year and so does Nick. Which means their values are about equal in a vacuum. But, there are a lot more relievers obtainable than right fielders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • At SS, I agree. I wonder if he had been primarily played at 2B or CF if you would feel the same way. Guess we'll never know.
    • I wasn’t referring to him overall as a player. I meant that is the type of play that might happen with a -10 defense guy.
    • But how does it damage or delay things?  What’s the time period for that?   Let’s say by Sunday, Holliday is 3-45 and they send him down.  He was up here for what, 2 weeks at that point? Was he delayed?  Did that hurt his development? Did Cowser’s development get hurt or damaged last year?  Did GRod get damaged? Thats the thing.  To me, using words like that sound to me that they are career altering.    For me, if that occurs, the player wasn’t going to be mentally tough to handle adversity no matter what his development was..that’s a big reason why I don’t believe in “rushed”.  
    • If Stewart had been that guy with a bat we wouldn't have cared that much. He was a 0 bat -10 glove guy. A better example would be Nelson Cruz maybe.
    • Personally I take rushed to mean something a bit milder. I think you're using the word more absolutely than many do, and that's the disagreement.  I would call a player rushed if they were brought up before they were ready to perform, and it damaged or delayed their development. Particularly if there was reason to doubt their readiness before the callup. But it doesn't have to be something that ruins them or that they never recover from for me to be willing to call it rushing.  Now I'm not sure they rushed Holliday under either definition, since there was tons of evidence supporting the idea of bringing him up. 
    • IMHO defensive prowess at premium positions generally benefits your pitchers to a more significant degree than offensive prowess. So C, CF, SS, 2B are positions that I would be OK with one or two players who profile +10 D/-10 O. I think the corners, (LF, RF, 3B and 1B) are where you can have one or two +10 O/-10 D types. 3B tends to be a corner spot where a stellar defender can change the course of a game or series, however.  I also believe that defensive skill is more highly correlated with superb athleticism; whereas offensive skills are less highly correlated with athleticism.  In other words, it's rare to see a great defender who is not a great athlete; but there are many excellent hitters who are not very athletic.  I think the O's like players who can defend at a very high level. I think they like exceptional athletes who are versatile defensively. They have been fortunate that many of their prospects are superb on both sides of the ball.   
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...