Jump to content

Rasmus and Young and give it a run


theobird

Recommended Posts

I say just go out and sign Rasmus and bring back Delmon. That will allow for a lot of flexibility and we take our chances with this group. Neither of the two contracts will be too rich, certainly nothing crippling if they fail. We still have a very deep pitching staff, and I think Rasmus in RF would make us even better defensively. Young is the RH bat we need on the bench. He gets some time as a RH DH, occasional LF appearance and PH deluxe. Give both Rasmus and Young a 2 year deal. Neither guy is on the wrong side of 30, they both have value and at their ages would both be tradeable if you wanted to at any point in time. Rasmus is so talented that I think he finally grows up under Buck and ends up worth way more than we sign him for. Just my two cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think I would be ok with rasmus. He has power, we are a power team. Wasn't there analysis recently that suggested obp may not be as valuable to one team as it would another? Obp is king, if it is a team wide strength. But having just one guy with good obp doesn't go that far. Team obp is a death of a thousand cuts. We don't have a thousand cuts. So to me, searching for just one obp guy doesn't do much. I could be totally off base with this comment, but to me, it makes sense. Our strength is power, until our lineup is overhauled, I say just keep hitting bombs, and playing good d.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I would be ok with rasmus. He has power, we are a power team. Wasn't there analysis recently that suggested obp may not be as valuable to one team as it would another? Obp is king, if it is a team wide strength. But having just one guy with good obp doesn't go that far. Team obp is a death of a thousand cuts. We don't have a thousand cuts. So to me, searching for just one obp guy doesn't do much. I could be totally off base with this comment, but to me, it makes sense. Our strength is power, until our lineup is overhauled, I say just keep hitting bombs, and playing good d.

I think what the O's should be looking for is a balanced offense. They have had over 200 home runs for three years in a row. And if the O's current lineup has just average years they will have 200 home runs agains next year.

The O's were 11th out of 15 AL teams in OBP last year with a 311 OBP. They lost Markakis 342 OBP and Cruz 333 OBP. This makes them about a projected 305 OBP next year with their current lineup. Rasmus' 298 OBP from last year will not help bring the O's OBP up. However if they add Aoki 350 OBP and Young's 337 OBP then the O's may be able to get back close to where their OBP was last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what the O's should be looking for is a balanced offense. They have had over 200 home runs for three years in a row. And if the O's current lineup has just average years they will have 200 home runs agains next year.

The O's were 11th out of 15 AL teams in OBP last year with a 311 OBP. They lost Markakis 342 OBP and Cruz 333 OBP. This makes them about a projected 305 OBP next year with their current lineup. Rasmus' 298 OBP from last year will not help bring the O's OBP up. However if they add Aoki 350 OBP and Young's 337 OBP then the O's may be able to get back close to where their OBP was last year.

Delmon on had a career year in OBP. I don't think I'd count on a repeat performance from such a free swinger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what the O's should be looking for is a balanced offense. They have had over 200 home runs for three years in a row. And if the O's current lineup has just average years they will have 200 home runs agains next year.

The O's were 11th out of 15 AL teams in OBP last year with a 311 OBP. They lost Markakis 342 OBP and Cruz 333 OBP. This makes them about a projected 305 OBP next year with their current lineup. Rasmus' 298 OBP from last year will not help bring the O's OBP up. However if they add Aoki 350 OBP and Young's 337 OBP then the O's may be able to get back close to where their OBP was last year.

I get what you're saying. But, as our team is constructed, is one or two guys going to make a difference? We will still have poor team obp. It may be a little less poor, but poor no less. Rasmus offense was as valuable as aoki, in less games. I really just feel that a minor uptick in obp isn't that valuable to us. When you go through a lineup where everyone is working counts, drawing walks, passing the baton, it's deadly. But no matter who we sign, that will not be our lineup. So let's add some bombs to negate the bombs we lost. And keep our formula. Again, I totally understand you're point, and I'm not totally convinced I am right in this debate. But right now, gun to my head, that's where I would side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delmon on had a career year in OBP. I don't think I'd count on a repeat performance from such a free swinger.

I like Delmon to repeat his production of last year because Buck is picking his spots. He is going to be hitting against pitchers he has a reasonable expectation of hitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get what you're saying. But, as our team is constructed, is one or two guys going to make a difference? We will still have poor team obp. It may be a little less poor, but poor no less. Rasmus offense was as valuable as aoki, in less games. I really just feel that a minor uptick in obp isn't that valuable to us. When you go through a lineup where everyone is working counts, drawing walks, passing the baton, it's deadly. But no matter who we sign, that will not be our lineup. So let's add some bombs to negate the bombs we lost. And keep our formula. Again, I totally understand you're point, and I'm not totally convinced I am right in this debate. But right now, gun to my head, that's where I would side.

To each his own. I would rather have Aoki's 350 OBP leading off than Rasmus' strikeouts, low OBP and some more homers. But that is just me.

You saw what adding Wallace did for the pitchers last year. I think we will see a different hitting approach from Coolbaugh. More OBP oriented. He is not going to change Adam Jones. But he might change Schoop and Machado.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say just go out and sign Rasmus and bring back Delmon. That will allow for a lot of flexibility and we take our chances with this group. Neither of the two contracts will be too rich, certainly nothing crippling if they fail. We still have a very deep pitching staff, and I think Rasmus in RF would make us even better defensively. Young is the RH bat we need on the bench. He gets some time as a RH DH, occasional LF appearance and PH deluxe. Give both Rasmus and Young a 2 year deal. Neither guy is on the wrong side of 30, they both have value and at their ages would both be tradeable if you wanted to at any point in time. Rasmus is so talented that I think he finally grows up under Buck and ends up worth way more than we sign him for. Just my two cents.

Rasmus stinks and Delmon is a role player.....we will need to do better than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get what you're saying. But, as our team is constructed, is one or two guys going to make a difference? We will still have poor team obp. It may be a little less poor, but poor no less. Rasmus offense was as valuable as aoki, in less games. I really just feel that a minor uptick in obp isn't that valuable to us. When you go through a lineup where everyone is working counts, drawing walks, passing the baton, it's deadly. But no matter who we sign, that will not be our lineup. So let's add some bombs to negate the bombs we lost. And keep our formula. Again, I totally understand you're point, and I'm not totally convinced I am right in this debate. But right now, gun to my head, that's where I would side.
Power and pine tar are the two most important things in today's game.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Well it certainly doesn't look like he'll be winning Rookie of Year award. And if we send him down for like the tiniest amount of time, we get him for another year, right? I think if this poor hitting continues it's financial mismanagement not to send him back down. Grayson got sent down and came back way better.
    • He certainly isn't a bust but I wasn't happy with the pick at the time and I don't love using the second overall pick for that type of player profile. Westburg signed for slot so he's irrelevant but Mayo was a great use of the money saved.
    • Think Heston will be the next call up. Mayo’s K/BB ratio is poor and I think they’ll want to see that even out. Stowers and Norby have seen their numbers slip a bit.  It will likely take an injury to an outfielder or first baseman, but I think we see HK next. 
    • I have to laugh at some of my pre-draft thoughts as well as others. I will say on behalf of myself and some others is that what we did not understand then was what the Orioles brain trust knew to be their model, and what they best developed. What traits they were looking for is an important thing to know, in hindsight anyway. And really, the Jackson Holliday leap in development was not something most of us heard anything about until about a month before the draft. I saw him the previous summer and I cannot say he was all that impressive, but it was only one look. His physicality took a big jump after that.  I will also add that we’re never going to know what would have happened if they drafted Austin Martin, Jones, Lawler, Lacy, etc. Their development could well have been different as O’s. The funny part of this board, in general, is the absolute certainty some have in their opinions and how eager they are to trash Elias and staff. There is plenty of humility to go around, now that things have played out. It’s fun to finally have a truly great front office and ownership group, and a stacked stable of horses. 
    • How did the moustache work for Austin Hays?
    • Thanks for the kind words @HbgOsFan and thanks especially for reading them.
    • I just think it’s too soon to think about sending him down.  Two more weeks like this?  It definitely would be time.  But I’ll bet we don’t see two more weeks like this.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...