Jump to content

Steve Pearce and Orioles settle arbitration case for $3.7 million


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

And then there were three...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Orioles down to three arb cases. Steve Pearce has settled.</p>— Dan Connolly (@danconnollysun) <a href="

">January 30, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Pearce had filed for Pearce $5.4 million and Os countered at $2 million. Settlement should be near but not quite $4M</p>— Dan Connolly (@danconnollysun) <a href="

">January 30, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right at the midpoint.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Pearce agrees at about $3.7M which was midpoint</p>— Dan Connolly (@danconnollysun) <a href="

">January 30, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I had no idea which way this was going to go. Midpoint seems safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then there were three...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Orioles down to three arb cases. Steve Pearce has settled.</p>— Dan Connolly (@danconnollysun) <a href="

">January 30, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Pearce had filed for Pearce $5.4 million and Os countered at $2 million. Settlement should be near but not quite $4M</p>— Dan Connolly (@danconnollysun) <a href="

">January 30, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Outstanding. Life Changing Money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right at the midpoint.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Pearce agrees at about $3.7M which was midpoint</p>— Dan Connolly (@danconnollysun) <a href="

">January 30, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I had no idea which way this was going to go. Midpoint seems safe.

I think the O's would have won.

Would rather not have the acrimony these things generate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most likely candidate left. Not much of a gulf but with a super 2 every dollar counts twice.

Buck should have used the two run save rule.

I know Buck is Teflon and all, but he would still take some crap if someone other than Britton blew a three run save when Britton has an ERA well under two. I completely agree that it is the right move, but I'm not sure that Buck would make it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Buck is Teflon and all, but he would still take some crap if someone other than Britton blew a three run save when Britton has an ERA well under two. I completely agree that it is the right move, but I'm not sure that Buck would make it.

He just would have spouted some nonsense about not believing in the save rule. :P

And yes, it is obvious that Buck won't do it (neither will any other current manager).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He just would have spouted some nonsense about not believing in the save rule. :P

And yes, it is obvious that Buck won't do it (neither will any other current manager).

I wish managers made more sensible decisions but as long as there are talking heads to rile up the masses, stasis will dominate. Britton pitched three consecutive twice last year. The first time he blew a one-run save, 1 of his 4 blown saves on the year. The second time, he converted a three run save. I wonder whether Buck considered having Tommy Hunter slam the door in that July 3rd game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it wasn't Pearce.

Who won't settle?

Roch thinks it will be De Aza.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>De Aza, 1 of the 3 unsigned, submitted $5.650 million and <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a> countered at $5 million. Small gap but he's most likely to go to hearing</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">January 30, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I think he is the most likely to win, even his requested amount came well under MLBTR's projection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Certainly hard to sit O'Hearn with the way he's been hitting against righties. But Kjerstad doesn't have major split issues so he may be able to take some of those lefty PAs.
    • This team is good enough to win with Holliday, Norby, or Urias at 2B. I think the thought of staying with Holliday is that he has the highest ceiling by far of the 3. And if you can get him going so that by the end of the season he is ready for "take off", he gives you that one additional weapon that Norby nor Urias are. IMO, there are several issues with turning to Norby to replace Holliday now.  1) He has no long term place on this team. So you are in effect starting his Major League clock unnecessarily, when he most likely has more value to another org if he stays at AAA and can start his MLB clock on their choosing. 2) What if he struggles? Then what? Do you turn back to Holliday? If he struggles, it may damage his trade value. 3) What if Holliday regains his stroke at AAA? What do you do then even if Norby has managed to do a decent job or even a good job? Do you keep Holliday for the rest of the year? 4) And to me this is the biggest - What is the best use of his value? To be a bench player here long term? Or to be part of a trade that brings the Major League team something that it needs (in the pitching department)?
    • Agree with you that Mayo is special, and that if I were going to be on one of our players being an impact, middle of the order bat, it's him (though if Cowser and Westburg continue to hit anything like this we'll have a few of them! And I'm a big believer in Kjerstad's bat too). I don't think it's really that complicated, though, no? Santander will leave next season and Kjerstad takes that place. Trade Mountcastle and that's Mayo's spot. Basallo is still a ways off and things will probably work themselves out with injury or what not by then. Norby, Stowers, and Ortiz were always going to be the three that it was going to really be a struggle to find a spot for, and the Ortiz trade solved the Ortiz issue, and now I think you're in a situation where, barring injury, Stowers probably ought to be trade bait and Norby could become a really valuable 12th hitter off the bench next season. 
    • I'm pretty much in agreement with SG on this one. I don't know if he should be sent down, but as SG said, “That's where I trust Elias.” I disagree a little bit on the “hurting his confidence” issue. I think hitting a baseball successfully is a lot like hitting a golf ball successfully… a lot of what impacts your success is what you have going on between your ears. While there's a danger in hurting his confidence by sending him out there every day while he's in a sustained slump, there's also a danger in sending him down to Norfolk. But, once again, I have to trust Elias and management on making that call. 
    • I was dead wrong on this -- i thought for sure it would be McKenna. Kjerstad is obviously deserving of it and happy for the kid. If Hyde is gonna try and get him in the line up regularly its gonna come at the expense of someone else. Who is that? Maybe Mountcastle's knee is worse than they are telling us. Either way, what happens when Hays gets healthy? I'm sure they are operating on the "things always work themselves out" theory. Long term, this org really needs to develop or trade for a power hitting RH bat that plays the OF/1B. Looking forward to see how this works out.
    • Yeah, I agree. It makes sense for them to do now while Hays is injured and they can figure it out, especially since Mountcastle is dealing with his knee injury. When Hays comes back though, I don’t know what they’ll do if there’s no other injuries. Somebody has to be the odd one out and I don’t see them DFA’ing Urias or Mateo. Possibly that could be their excuse to send down Holliday for a reset/service time if they think his chance at ROY is shot, but the bench composition works a lot better with the additional infielder. Anyway I hope Kjerstad rakes in the opportunities he gets now and makes it interesting. 
    • I didn't realize Heston had gotten to 10 home runs already this season.  That's wild stuff. I think this spells a little more bench time for Mounty, deserved or not.  VS RHP we'll see a little more O'hearn at 1B w/ Heston at DH.  If they want Mount in there then they'll sit Tony Taters every once in a while and either Heston or O'hearn can play RF.  Imagine Santander's switch hitting bat on the bench late - quite a weapon! All the talk about who gets starts where, but what this really does is makes the bench a true weapon that managers will have to think about when making pitching changes.  You sure you want to bring in that LHP in the 7th to face O'hearn?  OK, here's Mountcastle to take his place at 1B seamlessly and mash.   You sure you to want to bring in a RHP to face McCann?  OK we can bring in Heston and still have O'hearn for later, or vice-versa.  Its wild, its versatile, and it packs a real punch late in games.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...