Jump to content

Opening Day Tix


Pedro Cerrano

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 261
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Actually, it says right on the ticket page:

Opening Day Tickets: The only way to guarantee tickets to Opening Day, Friday, April 10 vs. the Toronto Blue Jays, is by purchasing a Full Season or 29-Game Plan. Both plans include Opening Day as part of their package. All Season Plan Members will have an opportunity to purchase tickets to Opening Day via an online presale, based on seniority, which will take place on Thursday, March 19. On a first-come first-served basis, members will be eligible to purchase one Opening Day ticket for each Plan Seat purchased during the pre-sale, not to exceed 6 tickets. Opening Day tickets are not available to the general public. All sales will be subject to availability.

LINK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, it says right on the ticket page:

Opening Day Tickets: The only way to guarantee tickets to Opening Day, Friday, April 10 vs. the Toronto Blue Jays, is by purchasing a Full Season or 29-Game Plan. Both plans include Opening Day as part of their package. All Season Plan Members will have an opportunity to purchase tickets to Opening Day via an online presale, based on seniority, which will take place on Thursday, March 19. On a first-come first-served basis, members will be eligible to purchase one Opening Day ticket for each Plan Seat purchased during the pre-sale, not to exceed 6 tickets. Opening Day tickets are not available to the general public. All sales will be subject to availability.

LINK

How does everyone else feel about 29-game plan holders having priority for additional seats on top of the ones that come with their plan over new 13-game plan holders?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a 29-game holder, I like it.

As an impartial observer, I think that's perfectly fair. Bigger $$ commitment should come with additional perks.

Take the larger dollar commitment out of it then. Should the 2-seat 29-game upper reserve plan holder have priority to get 4 Opening Day tickets over the 2-seat 13-game lower box plan holder getting zero Opening Day tickets?

My grandfather is a 29-game plan holder and I have purchased his additional Opening Day tickets for years, so I am also not impartial here. Curious what others think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take the larger dollar commitment out of it then. Should the 2-seat 29-game upper reserve plan holder have priority to get 4 Opening Day tickets over the 2-seat 13-game lower box plan holder getting zero Opening Day tickets?

My grandfather is a 29-game plan holder and I have purchased his additional Opening Day tickets for years, so I am also not impartial here. Curious what others think.

If you want to restrict the 29-game UR holder to getting additional UR tickets, I think that would be fair.

My overall opinion is that if you are committing to 29 or 81 games vs. 13, you are much more likely to maybe be splitting a plan with another person. So maybe you take 2 tickets to 15 games and your co-owner takes 2 tickets to 14 games.

I think it is reasonable to offer that plan holder up to 4 tickets for OD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want to restrict the 29-game UR holder to getting additional UR tickets, I think that would be fair.

My overall opinion is that if you are committing to 29 or 81 games vs. 13, you are much more likely to maybe be splitting a plan with another person. So maybe you take 2 tickets to 15 games and your co-owner takes 2 tickets to 14 games.

I think it is reasonable to offer that plan holder up to 4 tickets for OD.

My larger point that I didn't make above is that with the Orioles dollar-for-dollar exchange policy, it is foolish to get a 13-game plan that is more expensive than the cheapest 29-game plan due to the difference in perks for Opening Day and playoff tickets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My larger point that I didn't make above is that with the Orioles dollar-for-dollar exchange policy, it is foolish to get a 13-game plan that is more expensive than the cheapest 29-game plan due to the difference in perks for Opening Day and playoff tickets.

Now see, my wife and I like our seats. They are the best value in the park and the specific seats that we have are perks in and of themselves. It would be tough to get a similar value out of 28 game plan dollar for dollar exchange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My larger point that I didn't make above is that with the Orioles dollar-for-dollar exchange policy, it is foolish to get a 13-game plan that is more expensive than the cheapest 29-game plan due to the difference in perks for Opening Day and playoff tickets.

Well, I think those people are smart, if that is what they want to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well this is my second year having a plan so I hope to get priority over all those folks that just bought a plan to get playoff seats last year.

The levels of priority are those who have been season holders prior to 2012. Recent 81 and 29 game plan holders. And finally 13 game plan holders of the last few seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Because Mateo should start in CF and Urias belongs on the bench as much as possible, and just started on Monday. Jackson had some better AB's last night and should be given the chance to build on them, if he is being given the opportunity to work his way out of this.
    • There’s only one or two posters I know of who have seriously suggested extending Means, and that was during the offseason before his delayed start to 2024 and rocky rehab.  yark14 is crazy if he thinks anyone but him will be clamoring for a Means extension after 2-3 starts.   He could throw 20 shutout innings and I doubt there would be much clamor.  Let’s see Means get through the remainder of the season healthy and then we can worry about whether we want him to be part of the team in 2025.   
    • It's when a large market (non-revenue sharing recipient team) finishes low in the standings, it limits their draft slot.  Hard to differentiate between sucking on purpose or more organic reasons...  but the large market teams can at least band-aid the issue with money.
    • Those were two crappy plays and each one resulted in a runner advancing to 2B.   The burden of proof is on Kjerstad to show he’s better than O’Hearn out there.   He sure didn’t prove it last night.  
    • Nothing was working yet he threw a lot of strikes, had 7 Ks, only walked 1 and had a swingstr% of 25%. Plenty was working.  However, he had way too many hittable pitches as well. Wild in the strike zone. 6 days rest may have been a little too much as well.
    • Well, given his injury history, please put me down in the camp for a big no to any extension for John Means. If we are going to pay for pitching beyond this season (which we should and probably will have to) I am very confident that we will be able to find better than I guy who hasn’t been healthy since 2021. Extending him after 2 or 3 starts after he has missed 2 years seems to be the definition of unwise.
    • Yep.  Wading through pages of drama just for the next nugget is tiring...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...