Jump to content

The Chris Tillman Extension Thread


25 Nuggets

Recommended Posts

Jon Heyman: Orioles ace Tillman begins talks with Orioles about possible extension

Now we all know Jon Heyman / Joel Sherman are part of the poker game when it comes to these things; nonetheless the subject is officially in play:

SARASOTA, Fla. -- Orioles ace Chris Tillman and the team began to talk about a possible long-term contract within the past day or two, though talks thus far are said only to be about "concepts" and not hard numbers, say people familiar with the discussions.

Tillman, the Orioles' presumed Opening Day starter, will talk with the team throughout the remainder of spring training, with the opener viewed as the deadline to get a deal done.

Tillman will earn $4.315 million this year, his first year of arbitration eligibility, if nothing new can be worked out before the season. He has three more arbitration years and is due to become a free agent following the 2017 season.

The big right-hander has emerged as a star in Baltimore, going 38-14 the past three years, including 13-6 last year, when he had a career-best 3.36 ERA. Tillman was 16-7 with a 3.71 ERA in 2013, when he made the All-Star team. He has exceeded 200 innings each of the past two seasons, and last year he tied for the league lead with 34 starts.

The plan to discuss a contract was first reported by Joel Sherman of the New York Post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2016 (Arb 2): $7 mm

2017 (Arb 3): $10 mm

2018 (FA 1): $12 mm

2019 (FA 2): $15 mm

2020 (FA 3): $17.5 mm team option ($2 mm buyout)

2021 (FA 4): $17.5 mm team option ($2 mm buyout)

Who hangs up the phone?

That seems fair to both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2016 (Arb 2): $7 mm

2017 (Arb 3): $10 mm

2018 (FA 1): $12 mm

2019 (FA 2): $15 mm

2020 (FA 3): $17.5 mm team option ($2 mm buyout)

2021 (FA 4): $17.5 mm team option ($2 mm buyout)

Who hangs up the phone?

Do you honestly see this team committing 17.5 per year to 1 player? I don't - at least not right now.

FWIW, I like the deal and the flexibility you built into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you honestly see this team committing 17.5 per year to 1 player? I don't - at least not right now.

FWIW, I like the deal and the flexibility you built into it.

Sure. Especially if it is a team option. If 2020 rolls around and Tillman has at least maintained his 2012 - 2014 success from 2015 - 2019 without any glaring red flags that he he is about to fall off a cliff, I think the Orioles wouldn't have any issue paying him $17.5 m for one season. Also FWIW, Adam Jones will make $16.33 in 2016 and 2017 and $17.33 in 2018, so the Orioles have already shown they will make that sort of commitment to one player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you honestly see this team committing 17.5 per year to 1 player? I don't - at least not right now.

FWIW, I like the deal and the flexibility you built into it.

It has to happen sooner or later. And they have already attached similar amounts to extensions before.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you honestly see this team committing 17.5 per year to 1 player? I don't - at least not right now.

FWIW, I like the deal and the flexibility you built into it.

They would not be committing with this structure. There are $2M buyouts for years 5 and 6. Worst case scenario, it is 4 years, $49M (about what Ubaldo has gotten). The buyouts are the key. Seems reasonable to both sides.

My only question is if Tillman has TJ in year 2 or 3, is it worth it? I wonder if there could be a "Lackey clause", maybe not as extreme as league minimum but maybe making some amount of the 2018 and 2019 dollars tied to incentives for games pitched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2016 (Arb 2): $7 mm

2017 (Arb 3): $10 mm

2018 (FA 1): $12 mm

2019 (FA 2): $15 mm

2020 (FA 3): $17.5 mm team option ($2 mm buyout)

2021 (FA 4): $17.5 mm team option ($2 mm buyout)

Who hangs up the phone?

Sure that sounds great for us but Tillmans agent would laugh at this.. He will get a better offer on the market cause we all know, Great pitching comes at a high premium. It also shows that the Orioles are only willing to commit 2 years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure that sounds great for us but Tillmans agent would laugh at this.. He will get a better offer on the market cause we all know, Great pitching comes at a high premium. It also shows that the Orioles are only willing to commit 2 years...

They would be committing for four years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2016 (Arb 2): $7 mm

2017 (Arb 3): $10 mm

2018 (FA 1): $12 mm

2019 (FA 2): $15 mm

2020 (FA 3): $17.5 mm team option ($2 mm buyout)

2021 (FA 4): $17.5 mm team option ($2 mm buyout)

Who hangs up the phone?

I'd actually be on board with this. I'd still rather just go year to year and take bigger risks on someone less dependent on their defense, but this would be reasonable enough that I wouldn't dislike it. Of course I also like Tillman, and most of our starters, less than almost everyone here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They would not be committing with this structure. There are $2M buyouts for years 5 and 6. Worst case scenario, it is 4 years, $49M (about what Ubaldo has gotten). The buyouts are the key. Seems reasonable to both sides.

My only question is if Tillman has TJ in year 2 or 3, is it worth it? I wonder if there could be a "Lackey clause", maybe not as extreme as league minimum but maybe making some amount of the 2018 and 2019 dollars tied to incentives for games pitched.

Interestingly enough, the Dodgers added the "Lackey clause" to their deal with Olivera, though for a $1M and not league minimum. Seems like something that may become more prevalent.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a "Lackey clause" would be a hard sell for Tillman unless something specific shows up in his medical exams. Lackey already had Tommy John when he signed his deal and Olivera's medicals reveal significant potential UCL issues. If Tillman extends in the next two weeks, I doubt they will be able to get him to agree to such a clause. He has been very healthy thus far in his career. If anything, he will be looking to get rewarded for that strong record of health rather than penalized for a potential injury down the road. I wouldn't be surprised if we start to see more pitchers with identifiable/significant injury concerns agree to those sorts of deals, but I would be surprised if such language were to be included in a Tillman contract extension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
    • My point was an overly uppercut swing isn't going to result in that low a launch angle.  Not unless he is somehow consistently topping the pitches, which seems pretty unlikely.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...