Jump to content

The Royals are Smokin Hot


CA-ORIOLE

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Only the haters and the ignorant would call them a fluke.

Do you check this site every day to see if someone says something about the Royals? You don't post for 6 months and then all of the sudden someone says something about the Royals and you pounce on it. Kind of creepy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, definitely creepy that Royals poster. Not exactly helping your team's fan image there bud.

As for the Royals team, I don't think they're a fluke at all. They have a great bullpen, great defense, tons of speed, do a lot of different things well. They're kind of like the O's imo. Underrated and greater than the sum of their parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like there have been a lot of teams that unexpectedly made the playoffs one year, then started the following season incredibly hot. Sometimes they stay hot, but sometimes they don't.

Right now, the Royals have five starters hitting .360 or higher. That won't be sustained. Their bullpen is excellent, but they haven't allowed a run yet in 7 games, and that's not sustainable either. It's a long season, and though I won't be surprised to see the Royals make the playoffs again, they will come down to earth eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Royals are definitely legit and I didn't think they were a fluke last year but to go with what Frobby is saying, they're not going to be this hot throughout the season. You're never as great as you look when you're smoking and you're never as bad when you're at your absolute worst either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only the haters and the ignorant would call them a fluke.

KC has been good for a little over a year now. That is not enough to be considered legit contenders. They have a lot of question marks to answer this year. And Baltimore was still considered a fluke well into last year even though they had winning records for two plus years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KC has been good for a little over a year now. That is not enough to be considered legit contenders. They have a lot of question marks to answer this year. And Baltimore was still considered a fluke well into last year even though they had winning records for two plus years.

Precisely. Great point about how we had people calling us a fluke well into last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Royals have 4 starters with an OPS of 1130 or better. They're on pace for 231 HRs, 1203 RS and 416 runs given up. Clearly they're going to be the best team in the history of the world.

Or. They are real lucky again. Eventually, lucky becomes good. I am not there yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
    • My point was an overly uppercut swing isn't going to result in that low a launch angle.  Not unless he is somehow consistently topping the pitches, which seems pretty unlikely.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...