Jump to content

Cruz , Miller, Markakis, poll


El Gordo

Cruz, Miller, Marakakis, Other, yes or no  

191 members have voted

  1. 1. Cruz, Miller, Marakakis, Other, yes or no


This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Sorry but I am so tired of all the Cruz, Miller, Markakis, shoulda, woulda, coulda, that I want to make a poll to see just how many people really feel we should have signed any of them. Yes/no, Cruz, Miller, Markakis or other. If other, say who and why and for how much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Multiple choice, nice!

Cruz - Never happening.

Miller - Not even CLOSE to worth what he got.

Kakes - Wanted him back. But with the undisclosed surgery, DD made the right choice. Cut the years back and Atlanta shot their load. Glad they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted yes for other. I was interested in Seth Smith. Don't know if we had someone as good as Maurer to offer in trade. Also thought we should have looked into trading for Marlin Byrd. Wanted Cuddyer until he got the QO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll vote when I'm in front of a computer. But I would have signed Miller. I wouldn't have signed Wright, Matusz, and Hunter (who was great tonight) to cover the cost.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not to pick on you buddy...

I just don't understand this! Why pay so much when Zach is just as good and a third the price?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to pick on you buddy...

I just don't understand this! Why pay so much when Zach is just as good and a third the price?

A few reasons:

Getting rid of Matusz and Hunter and not adding Wright provides flexibility.

You can keep Garcia and then have a spot in the bullpen that you can send guys up and down when you need to (M Wright, Wilson, Johnson, Gamboa, TJM, Drake) instead of playing the DL game. I think that makes our team better.

Then, what if Britton gets hurt later this summer? There's no need to panic and overpay because you have Miller on deck.

And I'm doing this within the budget.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few reasons:

Getting rid of Matusz and Hunter and not adding Wright provides flexibility.

You can keep Garcia and then have a spot in the bullpen that you can send guys up and down when you need to (M Wright, Wilson, Johnson, Gamboa, TJM, Drake) instead of playing the DL game. I think that makes our team better.

Then, what if Britton gets hurt later this summer? There's no need to panic and overpay because you have Miller on deck.

And I'm doing this within the budget.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A bunch of unproven/barely proven arms.

In exchange for $36+ million. And 4 years ball and chain. Pass!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cruz: 3/40

Miller: 3/24

Markakis 3/33 (for old time's sake)

None of those figures proved to be in the ballpark, so to speak. Obviously the team would be better with Cruz and Miller on board, but we live in the real world. No regrets watching them walk given the price. I also would have non-tendered CD. That would have made the discussion very different IMO.

I thought Aoki would have been a worthwhile pickup. Still do.

I was briefly intrigued by Kemp. Then I sobered up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think Britton will be on the team next season?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe. Doubt it. DD will find another option. And it won't cost us $9 million for three more years. I'm 85, 90% against ANY reliever on a multi-year deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe. Doubt it. DD will find another option. And it won't cost us $9 million for three more years. I'm 85, 90% against ANY reliever on a multi-year deal.
Britton has three more years of arb. They could offer him a multi year deal or at least ago another year. I doubt he would get more than 7M in arb, and that's not all that bad for a top closer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted yes for other. I was interested in Seth Smith. Don't know if we had someone as good as Maurer to offer in trade. Also thought we should have looked into trading for Marlin Byrd. Wanted Cuddyer until he got the QO.

I agree with these, but I have no idea if they matched up on a Smith or Byrd trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...