Jump to content

2015 Oriole Draft Tracker


Recommended Posts

Like the previous years, this will be the thread where we will keep the draft picks and follow them through signing. Post any signings in this thread, or in the forum, and I'll keep this post updated. Thanks. Player will become bold when he signs.

1. (25) - DJ Stewart - OF - Florida State Discussion Thread

1A.(36) - Ryan Mountcastle - SS - Hagerty HS (FL) Discussion Thread

2. (68) - Jonathan Hughes - RHP - HS (GA) Discussion Thread

3. (102) - Garrett Cleavinger - LHP - Oregon Discussion Thread

4. (133) - Ryan McKenna - CF - HS (NH) Discussion Thread

5. (163) - Jason Heinrich - LF - River Ridge HS (FL) Discussion Thread

6. (193) - Jay Flaa - RHP- North Dakota State Discussion Thread

7. (223) - Gray Fenter - RHP - HS (AR) Discussion Thread

8. (253) - Seamus Curran - 1B - HS (MA) Discussion Thread

9. (283) - Jaylen Ferguson - OF - HS (TX) Discussion Thread

10.(313) - Reid Love - LHP - East Carolina Discussion Thread

11. (343) - Ryan Meisinger - RHP - Radner University (VA) Discussion Thread

12. (373) - Robert Strader - LHP - Louisville University (KY) Discussion Thread

13. (403) - Cedric Mullens - CF- Campbell University Discussion Thread

14. (433) - Drew Turbin - 2B- Dallas Baptist University (TX) - Discussion Thread

15. (463) - Christopher Shaw - C- University of Oklahoma - Discussion Thread

16. (493) - Mike Odenwaelder - CF - Amherst (MA) Discussion Thread

17. (523) - Branden Becker -SS - Cajon HS (CA) Discussion Thread

18. (553) - Nick Vespi - LHP -Palm Beach CC (FL) Discussion Thread

19. (583) - Jerry McClanahan -C- UC Irvine (CA) Discussion Thread

20. (613) - Adam Walton - SS - U Illinois Champagne alton-SS-U-Illinois-Champagne?p=3821664#post3821664'>Discussion Thread

21. (643) - Juan Echevarria - RHP - Osceola Senior HS (FL) Discussion Thread

22. (673) - Tristan Graham - RF - Northeast Texas CC (TX) Discussion

23. (703) - Will Dennis - LHP - Seattle Discussion Thread

24. (733) - Kirvin Moesquit - 3B - Seminole State (FL) Discussion Thread

25. (763) - Steve Laurino - 1B - Marist Discussion Thread

26. (793) - Rocky McCord - RHP - Auburn Discussion Thread

27. (823) - Stuart Levy - C - Arkansas State Discussion Thread

28. (853) - Christian Turnipseed - RHP - Georgia Gwinnett College Discussion Thread

29. (883) - Gabriel Garcia - C - Monteverde Academy (FL) Discussion Thread

30. (913) - Andrew Elliot - RHP - Wright State Discussion Thread

31. (943) - Will Shepley - LHP - UNC-Wilmington Discussion Thread

32. (973) - Cody Morris - RHP - Reservoir HS (MD) Discussion Thread

33. (1003)- Steven Klimek - RHP - St. Bonaventure Discussion Thread

34. (1033) - Korey Groves - RHP - Cal State Monterrey Bay Discussion Thread

35. (1063) - Guillermo Trujillo - RHP - Oral Roberts Discussion Thread

36. (1093) - Xavier Borde - LHP - Arizona Discussion Thread

37. (1123) - Jake Pries - LF - Juniper Serra HS Discussion Thread

38. (1153) - Jack Graham - 2B - Slippery Rock Discussion Thread

39. (1183) - Frank Crinella - UTL - Merrimack College Discussion Thread

40. (1183) - Michael Costello - RHP - Post University Discussion Thread

2014 Draft Tracker

2013 Draft Tracker

2012 Draft Tracker

2011 Draft Tracker

2010 Draft Tracker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Orioles?src=hash">#Orioles</a> have agreement with 6th-rdr. (193) Jay Flaa for $10K bonus. Senior sign. <a href="http://t.co/PBeybmSHHC">http://t.co/PBeybmSHHC</a></p>— Chris Cotillo (@ChrisCotillo) <a href="

">June 11, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

So we have saved $222,600

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is the number listed above the allotted amount for the entire draft, or just for the top 10 picks? If it's just the top 10, what's the allotted amount for the entire draft?

You get 100K for each pick after the 10th round. Any money not used to sign those picks can not be used elsewhere.

I don't expect Jack Graham to actually get 100K to sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You get 100K for each pick after the 10th round. Any money not used to sign those picks can not be used elsewhere.

I don't expect Jack Graham to actually get 100K to sign.

Yeah. It does not work they way glenn was asking anymore. I think you explained it as well as can be done.

glenn, if you want to give a 15 round pick 3 million. You have to save 2.9 million somewhere in the top 10 picks and sign all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. It does not work they way glenn was asking anymore. I think you explained it as well as can be done.

glenn, if you want to give a 15 round pick 3 million. You have to save 2.9 million somewhere in the top 10 picks and sign all of them.

To muddy the waters a bit more teams can go over their pool limits, but the Orioles have not shown any desire to do so to date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

glenn, if you want to give a 15 round pick 3 million. You have to save 2.9 million somewhere in the top 10 picks and sign all of them.

You have to sign all top 10 picks in order to sign someone drafted after the 10th round to above slot money? That doesn't make sense, am I misunderstanding?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to sign all top 10 picks in order to sign someone drafted after the 10th round to above slot money? That doesn't make sense, am I misunderstanding?

Yes you are.

If you do not sign someone in the top 10 the pool money allocated to that pick is lost.

That does not mean that you can not sign someone after the 10th round to an over slot deal if you have the money available.

What happened to the Astros last season is when the Aiken deal fell through and that money was removed from their pool they no longer had the funds to sign Nix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you pay a dollar in fines for every dollar you go over the limit, up to 105% of the pool. After that, you start losing draft picks.

Up to 5 percent over, a team is taxed 75 percent on the amount they go over. 5-10 percent over, a team is taxed 75 percent on the amount they go over AND lose their first-round selection in the next year's draft. 10-15 percent results in a 100 percent taxation on the overage, AND the loss of first- and second-round picks in the following draft. Over 15 percent results in a 100 percent tax on the overage and they lose their first round picks for the next two drafts.

It is very punitive, and I would be shocked if anyone ever went more than 5 percent over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Up to 5 percent over, a team is taxed 75 percent on the amount they go over. 5-10 percent over, a team is taxed 75 percent on the amount they go over AND lose their first-round selection in the next year's draft. 10-15 percent results in a 100 percent taxation on the overage, AND the loss of first- and second-round picks in the following draft. Over 15 percent results in a 100 percent tax on the overage and they lose their first round picks for the next two drafts.

It is very punitive, and I would be shocked if anyone ever went more than 5 percent over.

Yes. This. Thanks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Orioles?src=hash">#Orioles</a> have agreement with 6th-rdr. (193) Jay Flaa for $10K bonus. Senior sign. <a href="http://t.co/PBeybmSHHC">http://t.co/PBeybmSHHC</a></p>— Chris Cotillo (@ChrisCotillo) <a href="
">June 11, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

So we have saved $222,600

Nice, just as expected when the team drafted him. Who do you think gets the overslot money?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I don’t see the point. By and large, I think these extensions are very overrated by fans. I think it gives you a nice, warm and fuzzy feeling that your favorite players are locked in but for the team, unless you are getting a big discount, they don’t make a ton of sense. For a pitcher, who you have for another 4 years after this one, I don’t see it making sense unless he’s signing for real cheap. (Ie, I’m getting 2 FA years for 25M a year or less) If I’m getting that, I do it. But I think GRod has TJ surgery sometime in the next 3 years, so I’m really wary about it.
    • It's going to take a market deal at minimum and maybe even a record deal to entice them given who the agent is. But PLENTY of other young stars have extended. The Witt deal would be the comp/starting point for Gunnar.
    • Exactly. I had this same internal dialogue today, actually. He could break over the next 5 years, or he could be worthy of extending. Either way, that's not a today problem. Just let him be for now.
    • This is the kind of thing that drives me nuts about him. Every start it's like a totally different pitch mix. Or he'll get a K on a 96 mph heater up in the zone and you never see that pitch again. Or he has a guy 0-2 and chucks a random cutter down the middle. Like... throw a curve in the dirt man! 
    • This is a good question. IMO - You try with all 4 and see who's interested. Gunnar is obviously a superstar talent who is ascending at age 22. He already owns a sliver slugger and a ROY award. He also has Scott Boras for an agent. So I doubt there would be any discount on their end. Which is fine by me because we have a bilionaire owner, a growing/more engaged fanbase, who hasn't paid ANYONE in years. I.e. we should definitely have the money. I would love it if we did everything we could to make Gunnar an Oriole for at least the next 10 years. Adley is older at 25, but he arrived first. (If that matters?) Obviously at his position, you don't want to go as long with the deal. But he is closer to FA and the price will continue to go up. As the team leader, you would like for him to stick around. Burnes is probably the most valuable/most irreplaceable, in that he is the most rare commodity, an actual game #1 type starter, where no matter the matchup/opposing pitcher, we are never at a competitive disadvantage (plus he has experience). This is not to say that Grayson is not a budding ace in his own right. But you would like a few top notch pitchers to give yourself the best odds to go all the way in October. Burnes, (a healthy Bradish if such a thing is realistic), and Grayson ALONG with this lineup is a good recipe for post season success against ANY opponent (including the Dodgers or Braves). I would love to extend Holliday, but again the agent is Boras and the dad is a very wealthy former big leaguer, so there wil be no discounts there. I don't think it would be the best for team morale if we pursued an extension for Holliday first and bypassed Henderson and Rutschman. They are more accomplished players to this point. And it would be likely for them (if they were open to an extension) to harbor feelings of resentment with the rationale of "what has he done (Holliday) compared to me?"
    • The way the blue chip FA contracts are going lately is that they're only 2-3 years at a time to keep up with market value. I'd spend our ownership's money at $50m/yr to keep Burnes for 2-3 more years. Let someone else pay him in 2027 or 2028.
    • Haha I guess I see what I want to see. They did put up like 9 runs on the Red Sox in one inning with basically all singles, FWIW. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...