Jump to content

Chen


MeSoHardy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Somebody catch me up. Everyone is talking as if losing Chen is an absolute

guarantee at this point. Why is it that he is "definitely" leaving after this year. Money issue? Are the Orioles going to make a run at him?

Represented by Boras and will command a lot in the market. They will offer him the qualifying offer, Boras won't accept and they'll get the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is going to at least get the contract Ubaldo got.

He will get more, IMO. He's a lefty, more consistent, throws more innings, and there has been significant salary inflation over the last two years. I've predicted 5/$80 mm, assuming he has a strong year (which he has, so far). That may be a little too aggressive, but I think that'll be the ballpark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Represented by Boras and will command a lot in the market. They will offer him the qualifying offer, Boras won't accept and they'll get the pick.

And we'll miss him....big time. You don't allow your best pitcher, it's either he or Miguel, to get away without a fight. This isn't like replacing Norris with KG. Chen's loss is going to hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And we'll miss him....big time. You don't allow your best pitcher, it's either he or Miguel, to get away without a fight. This isn't like replacing Norris with KG. Chen's loss is going to hurt.

Don't worry, they have Bundy..., I mean Harvey...., I mean Wright waiting in the wings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He will get more, IMO. He's a lefty, more consistent, throws more innings, and there has been significant salary inflation over the last two years. I've predicted 5/$80 mm, assuming he has a strong year (which he has, so far). That may be a little too aggressive, but I think that'll be the ballpark.

Assumptions: Chen is a 2-win pitcher by fWAR, closer to 3 by rWAR, and will continue to be. Wins in free agency are valued at $7M. Inflation is at 5% per year.

Splitting the difference between f/rWAR you get 2.5 wins/year, or a total of 5 years at $97M. I'm sure Boras' initial offer will be just using rWAR as a starting point, so 3 wins a year, or more like 5/115.

I wouldn't pay that, or go that many years. Maybe no one will, but Boras will certainly try to get that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And we'll miss him....big time. You don't allow your best pitcher, it's either he or Miguel, to get away without a fight. This isn't like replacing Norris with KG. Chen's loss is going to hurt.

Maybe, but which will hurt more: trying to replace Chen, or coming to grips with paying a guy with a 3.75 ERA, basically average K/BB/HR numbers, and no 200-innings seasons $20M+ a year through 2021?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assumptions: Chen is a 2-win pitcher by fWAR, closer to 3 by rWAR, and will continue to be. Wins in free agency are valued at $7M. Inflation is at 5% per year.

Splitting the difference between f/rWAR you get 2.5 wins/year, or a total of 5 years at $97M. I'm sure Boras' initial offer will be just using rWAR as a starting point, so 3 wins a year, or more like 5/115.

I wouldn't pay that, or go that many years. Maybe no one will, but Boras will certainly try to get that.

I would say you were out of your mind, if it weren't for what happened with Rick Porcello. But I still think 5/$80 mm is closer to the mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say you were out of your mind, if it weren't for what happened with Rick Porcello. But I still think 5/$80 mm is closer to the mark.

I would say 5/80 is about right if not for Boras. I'd expect Chen to be sitting home in mid-March if the best offer he's gotten is 5/80. I think on the same team, in the same park, Porcello (prior to this year) and Chen are fairly comparable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truth be told I don't see them paying for Chen even if he had different representation.

Roughly an average pitcher who out-pitches his FIP because of Manny and Schoop and Joseph and the like, who understandably wants to be paid like his ERA would be the same in another context. Nope, they wouldn't sign him to a market-rate deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • A couple of things that I find interesting, Yaqui Rivera - Acquired in the Tanner Scott/Cole Sulser trade with the Marlins. Juan Nunez - Acquired in the Jorge Lopez trade.   Creed Willems - still only 20 and already in A+.  He got off to a big start last year as well and then struggled the rest of the year.  We're a little spoiled with prospect success from the college guys and HS phenoms Mayo, Holliday, and Gunnar.  The HS position players take some time.  
    • Perez threw an inning of rehab last night with Norfolk.  His velocity was down about 1.5 MPH on his sinker, and everything was down a tick, but he was getting some work in and doesn't look too far away from being ready.
    • I don’t trust that guy to be very useful despite the strong start. He’s a good regression candidate. Would rather have Kopech. 
    • O's have Fabian behind Bradfield and Mullins will likely decline after '25 when he becomes a FA. I think one of those two should be able to hold down CF. Beavers could be in the mix as well.
    • Its a total joke that Wagner isn’t it in yet. 
    • I see no dilemma. He’s under team control right now during his best season’s. When he becomes a FA he will be out of his prime. I mean I love Mullins as a player and what he brings. But when we are talking about priorities for extensions, he is nowhere near the top considering you have an MVP caliber 22 year old, an ultra talented top prospect who is 20, and your team leader is 25. Those 3 are the engine that will drive this bus toward postseason glory most probably, not Cedric Mullins. If the Yanks want to give him that kind of contract while we retain 2 out of the 3 if Henderson, Rutschman, and Holliday; then so be it!  What I shudder to think about is a prime Henderson or Holliday crushing it for one of our competitors so that we can have a declining CF. Didn’t we just do that the last go around? Where we choose to resign the (predictably) declining player while we let the younger/more talented player leave? Yes, I agree that Bradfield Jr’s development is important. But since Elias/Sig have been here they haven’t struck out on any first round picks. Also, if Bradfield proves to be a bust, they can always draft and/or develop another CF type.
    • Thanks, I missed that detail probably multi-tasking in the game thread. I do think Kimbrel has a good shot*...Wagner should go in next cycle, and the electorate in the coming years will be wrestling with how Epstein, Friedman, etc. have improved per pitch efficiency by downsizing the workload literally any individual pitcher can shoulder.      There can't not be any Hall of Famers with all this run prevention going on.    I think now that he's officially retired Strasburg will be a good debate.    Bumgarner too, though I don't believe I've seen that guy yet admitting any retirement. *better shot if say he can get the last out of an important postseason series or three in 2024.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...