Jump to content

Orioles' W-L in last year's starting pitchers' starts


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Wei-Yin Chen 19-12 (11-8)

Ubaldo Jimenez 18-14 (12-10)

Chris Tillman 15-16 (11-11)

Miguel Gonzalez 12-14 (9-12)

Kevin Gausman 7-10 (3-7 as a starter)

Bud Norris 4-7 (2-6 as a starter)

Mike Wright 3-6 (2-5 as a starter)

Tyler Wilson 3-2 (1-2 as a starter)

People remember how bad Bud Norris was last year, but contrary to popular opinion, his starts were not an automatic loss and eliminating his starts does not make up for the loss of Chen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wei-Yin Chen 19-12 (11-8)

Ubaldo Jimenez 18-14 (12-10)

Chris Tillman 15-16 (11-11)

Miguel Gonzalez 12-14 (9-12)

Kevin Gausman 7-10 (3-7 as a starter)

Bud Norris 4-7 (2-6 as a starter)

Mike Wright 3-6 (2-5 as a starter)

Tyler Wilson 3-2 (1-2 as a starter)

People remember how bad Bud Norris was last year, but contrary to popular opinion, his starts were not an automatic loss and eliminating his starts does not make up for the loss of Chen.

The Orioles were about a .666 club with Tillman on the mound the 3 previous years. He and Gausman will have to carry us to an extent.

Would you sign up right now for the Orioles to be 2 games over .500 if Gonzo and Ubaldo combine for about 60 starts? If course what the Orioles get out of their number 5 starter plays into that thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would sign up right now for 18-14 from Ubaldo.

If 3-5 pitch .500 ball can Tillman and Gausman pitch at least 18 games over .500 to get to 90 wins? 40-22 combined? If you get 4 games over from 3-5 that gives some leeway to 38-24 from the top 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting stuff Frobby.

Compared to 2014, Tillman and Norris had the 2 biggest differences in performance (I think we all knew that). But purely looking at W/L, Miguel had only a delta of 4 games.

		2015	2014Wei-Yin Chen	19-12	19-12U. Jimenez	18-14	9-13C. Tillman	15-16	24-10M. Gonzalez	12 -14	14-12Kevin Gausman	7-10	10-10Bud Norris	4-7	19-9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody is everything. If Tillman reverts to 2014 form, and everyone else stays the same and we get a significant downgrade from Chen in the other spot, we end up in about the same spot as this year.

Pretty much. We need to add another solid .500+ pitcher. And I'm not sure if Gallardo is that.

Last year the Rangers were 19-14 when he started, in 2014, Milwaukee was 12-20. Is that worth the gamble?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gausman and Tillman will more than make up for Chen, who benefited from a transcendent O's offense. Chen won't be a winner anymore, good front office decision to cut him loose and save the money for Davis, well worth all those years. Especially as Angelos made him take do much deferred money. Tillman will be top 5 Cy Young candidate.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wei-Yin Chen 19-12 (11-8)

Ubaldo Jimenez 18-14 (12-10)

Chris Tillman 15-16 (11-11)

Miguel Gonzalez 12-14 (9-12)

Kevin Gausman 7-10 (3-7 as a starter)

Bud Norris 4-7 (2-6 as a starter)

Mike Wright 3-6 (2-5 as a starter)

Tyler Wilson 3-2 (1-2 as a starter)

People remember how bad Bud Norris was last year, but contrary to popular opinion, his starts were not an automatic loss and eliminating his starts does not make up for the loss of Chen.

The loss of Chen is going a big regret by the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The starters records are not just a reflection of how they pitched but also how the defense played and how the relievers pitched.

...and we are assuming the bullpen will be great again, which may not be the case though we expect it.

Kevin Gausman 7-10 (3-7 as a starter)

That is what has to improve most IMO; the team needs to win more games that Gausman starts. I believe the stability of starting every turn in the rotation will help KG.

Also, if the rumor about Gallardo is true, he will provide additional stability in that rotation. Probably not 19-12 but you never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Baseball’s a funny game.  We spend 1.4M on Carter Young who played at D1 powerhouse Vanderbilt and he hasn’t looked too good so far in his pro career.  A year later in the 20th round, we pick Vazquez from North Greenville University (sorry. Never heard of it), sign him for 30k and he puts up an .822 OPS at Delmarva.  This year both Vazquez and Young are at Aberdeen and it’s not too difficult to guess which one is the better prospect. In 46 PA, Vazquez has 12 walks to 7 strikeouts and a .933 OPS.  In addition, he’s stolen 7 bases in 8 tries.   @Tony-OH also has said he’s a good defensive SS. 2023 draft.  Etzel in the 10th.  Vazquez in the 20th.  Nice job, scouts.
    • They may be a way to start him out. But I hope that is not the plan long term. If you had a chance to listen to Hyde's comments they appear to be trying to build Bradish back up into a regular starter. He talked about him building toward 80 pitches in his next rehab outing. In order for this team to get where it wants to go, we will need the Bradish of last year (or a comparable pitcher to that).
    • Hopefully Means gets a rehab extension for another 30 days. If not, this seems right to me. Does Bradish go to the pen, or does he start with one of Suarez, Kremer, or Irvin pushed to the pen? I kind of like Bradish as an opener with Irvin backing him up most of his starts.
    • He threw that fastball right down the shoot on a 1-2 count. That was not a case of Trout being Trout. It was a case of horrible location. I have to believe that it was not his intention to throw it there after he watched us beat Trout several times the night before with hard stuff up in the zone (Trout's only weakness). Maybe the extra day messed up something with Rodriguez's ability to execute? Maybe he just had a bad night? But this was not the case of the Angels being good. It was Grayson who was really bad.
    • But, but they lost. They absorbed a loss. 
    • That’s probably true and Elias said he also didn’t want to call him up if he wasn’t ready to be an everyday player.   So ………. something to keep an eye on.
    • Yea he has looked bad but while it’s fair to point that out, it’s also fair to point that some of this could be attributed to rust, an injury, not having a real ST, not playing in the field as much (I assume since he’s not catching?), etc…I think his timing is likely off and he’s working himself back into things. He has played 15 games. He has a multi hit game in 1/3 of his game so far. You point out all the Ks…what’s funny is all the Ks came in 5 games and he hasn’t struck out the last 4. To me the only thing that bothers me as of right now is the zero walks but it’s not something that would concern me long term.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...