Jump to content

vs. WHITE SOX, 4/30 JustD's Birthday Game


Sessh

Recommended Posts

Baltimore Orioles (14-8, 1st +1.5) vs. Chicago White Sox (16-8, 1st +2.5)

Streak / L10

BAL: +3, Won 3 of 4 / L10: 6-4

CWS: -2, Won 6 of 7 / L10: 8-2

Game 3 (7:05)

(QS=0)Kevin Gausman (0-1) 1.80 (1.00/.167), 7/2

vs.

(QS=4)Mat Latos (4-0) 0.74 (0.82/.151), 13/7 (1HR)

Kevin Gausman: Gausman looked sharp for most of his opening start throwing high 90's and allowing only one run on three hits and two walks in five innings. He also recorded seven strikeouts and threw 91 pitches. The only thing I didn't like was how he reacted when he got a couple bad calls. He seemed to lose his composure and his command suffered in the fifth inning. It also appeared as though Gausman intentionally threw high and tight to a batter which fortunately only hit jersey, but he has to have better self control and mental toughness than that because getting bad calls sometimes is a fact of life in baseball. Gausman has only two innings in relief against Chicago, but has done pretty well at Camden Yards which is exactly what we're going to need against Latos unless he decides to cool down.

Splits & Sits

6 vs. left: .167/.167/.333

15 vs. right: .167/.333/.200, 2BB

Bases Empty: .182

RISP: .000

RISP w/2 outs: .000

Men on w/2 outs: .250

Man on 3rd, < 2 outs: NA

Career @ Camden Yards (21 starts, 8 relief)

(9-7) 3.24 (1.15/.224), 15HR

Career vs. CWS (2 relief)

2 IP, H, 3K

vs. Batter

Melky Cabrera 2/5, RBI, BB

Austin Jackson 2/5, 2 2B

Brett Lawrie 1/5, 2BB

Dioner Navarro 1/5, RBI

Alex Avila 0/4

Avisail Garcia 0/2

Jerry Sands 0/2

Mat Latos: No two ways about it; Mat Latos has been practically unhittable. In 24.1 innings, he has allowed only two runs and 13 hits, but seven walks also. Latos has been plagued with abdominal and shoulder injuries both in the minors and during his time with the Padres and Reds and was uneffective last season after putting two and a half good years in Cincinnati, but he seems to be back to his old self early on for Chicago. His only start against the Orioles was really bad and Pedro Alvarez is the only one with a solid sample size.

Splits & Sits

48 vs. left: .130/.167/.229, HR

46 vs. right: .175/.283/.174, 5BB

Bases Empty: .172

RISP: .077

RISP w/2 outs: .000

Men on w/2 outs: .077

Man on 3rd, < 2 outs: .000

Career @ Camden Yards (1 relief)

(0-1) 5 IP, 10H, 5ER, HR

Career vs Baltimore (1 start)

(0-1) 5 IP, 10H, 5ER, HR

vs. Batter

Pedro Alvarez (29 AB) .276, 2HR, 6RBI, 5BB

Mark Trumbo 1/5, BB

Adam Jones 1/3

Chris Davis 1/2, RBI

Caleb Joseph 1/2, RBI

Jonathan Schoop 1/2, S-HR

The Orioles come away with a win in game two, but we can thank the many Chicago blunders in this one which was the difference in this game. The Orioles still had to take advantage of the open doors and that they did. There were two defensive blunders for Chicago in the bottom of the fifth after Rodon had pitched so well up to that point. One was a routine double play ball that was booted by Lawrie and the other an errant throw to first by Rollins on the second half of a double play apparently because he tripped over his own feet and tried to make the throw anyway. Then, there's the bad send on Rollins in the top of the sixth inning with the bases loaded which bailed the struggling Mike Wright out after giving up only one run. On top of all that, Ventura left Rodon in the game too long ultimately ending up with a three run homer from Reimold to right field which was the difference in this 6-3 win for the Orioles. We will now face Chicago's best two pitchers in the final two games of this four game set. Early on, the Orioles are looking like a team that is going to play well at home and struggle on the road.

Gausman and Latos. Latos is red hot coming into this one and you're going to have to make a trip to the Lawrence Berkeley National Labs to use their $27M electron microscope to find his ERA and WHIP. However, he has only made one start against the Orioles and it was at Camden Yards; it did not go well for him and it was in September of 2014. Gausman on the other hand has thrown only two relief innings against the White Sox, but has pitched very well at Camden Yards. Should be a good one as Brett Lawrie will go for three straight games of having a routine ground ball go through his legs.

The Yankees blew a lead in Boston as the Sox got two off of Tanaka in the seventh and got two more off of Betances in the eighth, so Boston remains 1.5 behind and the Yankees fall to five game out and have now lost two in a row along with the Rays. Toronto and TB are tied for third sitting four back, so there is a bit of a gap now between Baltimore/Boston and the rest. As for Chicago's 2.5 game lead, KC's game is in Seattle and is just getting ready to start now, so that lead will change based on what KC does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 807
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The Orioles are 23-1 in Darren O?Day?s last 24 appearances, including 10-0 this season.

For the Orioles

Manny Machado 3B

Adam Jones CF

Chris Davis 1B

Mark Trumbo RF

Matt Wieters C

Pedro Alvarez DH

J.J .Hardy SS

Jonathan Schoop 2B

Hyun Soo Kim LF

Kevin Gausman RHP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • The second question is - what extensions can the Orioles do with guys other than these 4, who are not Boras clients? Don’t want to rehash the “Boras clients don’t extend” debate, but let’s assume whatever they can do with these 4 doesn’t impact the ability to do other extensions.  Grayson: With 5 years of control after this one, it would have to be something like 6 years + a couple option years. Possible, but not super high priority.  Bradish: Entirely TBD on how he returns from injury, and even then a bit of the same question as Grayson with so much control remaining.  Westburg, Cowser and Kjerstad: Lumping them all together because I think it’s similar considerations. At their ages when their years of control expire, I don’t think it really makes sense. All 3 have been phenomenal to start the year but still have significant question marks about their games (really high whiff rates and not great K/BB for Westburg and Cowser, Kjerstad’s defense, chase rate and of course not yet facing MLB yet). Mayo and Basallo: Given their ages they are going to be the best candidates, IMO. However, it’s premature now for obvious reasons, particularly with the major questions about how much defensive value they are going to provide at the MLB level.  Unfortunately I have a hard time seeing any extensions happening in the near future, even if Elias and Rubenstein have all the best intentions of wanting to do them. 
    • My opinion in principle depends on the duration of the FA contract.  For the Orioles as currently constructed, the roster will be inexpensive over next 3 years with most premium guys either pre-arb or early arb years.  That would make me lean toward FA signing of elite SP this upcoming offseason. Now last winter we saw only Nola receive long duration contract at 7yrs (I’m putting Yamamoto & Ohtani in separate category given the JP marketing angle).  The industry seemed reticent to give $$$ and length to the other premium SPs (Snell, Montgomery) but was this Boras driven?  Would the premium SPs be willing to sign 3-4 yr deals at higher AAVs or instead play out essentially one year deals?  Example — would a guy like Burnes go for 4/175M? the market dynamics will be interesting with demand (which big market clubs pursuing — Cubs, LAA, SFG, NYY?) and supply (Burnes, Fried as FAs and Montgomery, Snell, Cole as potential opt outs).  As well as Boras negotiating factor.   
    • Adley by default (though not sure if he’d prefer to be west coast long term). I don’t expect Gunnar, Corbin, or Jackson to be viable extension options.  I know there are some examples of Boras clients extending like Strasbourg and Carlos Gomez, but it’s rare and I can’t see Elias pulling the trigger on what it would take to get one of those deals done.  
    • The playoffs is extremely volatile. This isn't the NBA or even the NFL; the best team doesn't win all the time, or perhaps even most of the time. So long as they are annually good enough to win the AL East, there really can be no rational critique of their approach.
    • You predicting any rings? At this point that should be the goal.
    • Here's my prediction: We're going to win ~ games this season and ~100 games next season. And in between, in the next off-season, this board will have several meltdowns bemoaning the lack of FA signings.
    • This is why I was against the Burnes trade. I could turn out to be wrong even only having him for one year, but I would have rather got a guy with a few years of control. I agree though. You really can't extend him at what he's going to ask for.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...