Jump to content

vs. ATHLETICS, 5/07 DH Gm.1


Sessh

Recommended Posts

Baltimore Orioles (16-11, T-1st, +2.0) vs. Oakland A's (13-16, 4th -4.0)

Streak / L10

BAL: +1, Lost 3 of 5 / L10: 5-5

OAK: -4, Lost 9 of 12 / L10: 3-7

Doubleheader Game 1 (1:05)

(QS=2)Mike Wright (1-2) 5.18 (1.27/.278), 18/6 (3HR)

vs.

(QS=4)Rich Hill (3-3) 2.53 (1.22/.224), 41/13 (2HR)

Mike Wright: Like Rich Hill, Wright has severe home/away splits so far with the better half being during home starts, but lefties have crushed Wright. He has never faced the A's and has thrown at least six innings in his last three starts with the two home starts being quality. All three of Wright's home runs have come from lefties and on the road.

Splits & Sits

47 vs. left: .317/.404/.511, 3HR

53 vs. right: .245/.288/.358

Bases Empty: .263, 2HR

RISP: .263

RISP w/2 outs: .375

Men on w/2 outs: .400

Man on 3rd, < 2 outs: .200

2016 Home (2 starts, 1 relief)

(0-1) 3.46 (1.31/.261)

Career vs. OAK (0 starts)

Debut

vs. Batter

NA

Rich Hill: Rich Hill has pitched very well for the A's early on with three straight quality starts coming into this one. He still hasn't allowed more than three earned in a game, but the A's defense has allowed three of his runs so far. Hill has thrown over 100 pitched in four straight games now. What's interesting about Hill is the dramatic home/away splits. Hill has been dominating on the road and very bad at home, but Hill does have awful numbers at Camden Yards mostly from the time he spent with the Orioles many years ago. I wouldn't put much stock into those numbers as a result. This could be a tough one for the Orioles and Hill has slightly favored ground balls (33/27) as well. The one weakness for Hill has been walks and 11 of them have come over his last four starts with four coming in the last one.

Splits & Sits

32 vs. left: .241/.281/.313

103 vs. right: .218/.340/.262, 2HR

Bases Empty: .200

RISP: .240

RISP w/2 outs: .077

Men on w/2 outs: .200

Man on 3rd, < 2 outs: .429

2016 Away (3 starts)

(3-0) 0.95 (0.89/.185), HR

Career @ Camden Yards (5 starts, 5 relief)

(0-0) 9.55 (2.17/.351), 2HR

Career vs Baltimore (1 start, 10 relief)

(1-0) 0.60 (0.73/.137)

vs. Batter

Chris Davis 0/6

Manny Machado 0/4

Caleb Joseph 0/3

Nolan Reimold 1/3, BB

Jonathan Schoop 0/3

Ryan Flaherty 1/2, 3B, 2BB

Matt Wieters 1/1, RBI

Adam Jones 1/1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 406
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Wow. Horrible crowd. I realize the weather is awful...but it looks like less than 10k there.

What must Angelos be thinking? All the money he spent this off-season, the team is in first place, but there are not too many butts filling seats. He sees the bad weather, but that weather (and much worse) doesn't keep football fans home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
    • My point was an overly uppercut swing isn't going to result in that low a launch angle.  Not unless he is somehow consistently topping the pitches, which seems pretty unlikely.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...