-
Who's Online 71 Members, 1 Anonymous, 160 Guests (See full list)
- Birds08
- RZNJ
- Absltgreek
- BobP
- Mooreisbetter27
- justcompete
- Aglets
- Sydnor
- OsFanSinceThe80s
- Fiver6565
- clapdiddy
- Too Tall
- TAMC
- LookinUp
- orioles119
- FlaO'sFan
- blid
- Flash- bd
- Pickles
- EdwinRip
- Mendoza Line
- Bemorewins
- Chavez Ravine
- NCRaven
- dalrymple
- Matty2D
- .500_OR_BETTER
- Aristotelian
- interloper
- The Bird
- Spakman
- BRobinsonfan
- ChosenOne21
- Orioles0615
- Rojo13
- Keygans
- MurphDogg
- Spy Fox
- lfallo1
- dcterp
- Low Country Bird
- Matt Bennett
- Gurgi
- Philip
- Jskins2190
- D&B
- Big Mac
- Hallas
- Beast
- DirtyBird
- John Eisenberg
- AnythingO's
- Orioles Jim
- CaptainRedbeard
- Sports Guy
- Hank Scorpio
- Otter
- dtk9119
- 7Mo
- The Goob
- Emory Eagle
- Tony-OH
- O's_first
- BirdinBama
- Moshagge3
- catseyepub
- Cavspider
- GBO'sFan
- TheDeau52
- baws22489
- Conway12
-
Posts
-
By Bemorewins · Posted
In 4 out of the next 9 we will face a LH starting pitcher. So there should be plenty of playing time to go around for him especially if he is going to start against lefties. Because those will be games that O'Hearn doesn't play and you gotta imagine that Mullins will sit a day or 2 against at least some of the Yanks tough lefties (Rodon and Cortez). -
By CaptainRedbeard · Posted
Maybe, but not if they DH Adley vs LHP, which they’ve continued to do a lot this year. If so, he’s not going to take the LH ABs from Cowser or Mullins because that means putting Kjerstad in the field somewhere and massively downgrading the defense. Otherwise Kjerstad is just replacing Mountcastle or Santander vs LHP, so not really a different consideration for playing time than when facing RHP. So hopefully Kjerstad can pick up some ABs vs LHP from O’Hearn at DH when Adley stays at C or gets a full day off, but I don’t expect that too often. -
We know that there will have to be tough roster decisions with this team in the near future. Is the plan to put those off until the offseason no matter what? If that's the plan, you might see a rationale for keeping the status quo. At the same time, I'd be fine with making one or two of those decisions by the deadline. But let's be honest here, you're talking about the risk with one player (Norby) by making the change I'm saying to make. It's not going to derail the future of this team or even his trade value. At the same time, I think they're doing Holliday a disservice. He only played 36 games in AA, and half that in AAA, last year. They didn't even give those leagues the chance to adjust to him. I really, honestly, think they've rushed the kid. I think he's showing that he's not ready offensively, or even defensively at 2B. Heck, I think he's overhyped in general even though I definitely see him eventually as an above average 2B and top of the league leadoff hitter. But he's not the uber athlete, big powerful MOO bat that someone like a Gunnar is. He's more of Jeter profile. That's wonderful, but it's not an ARod profile either and Jeter did what he did with 10/10 intangibles. I think there's more to gain by getting the extra year of service time and making sure he's ready, and I think that way outweighs the risks of losing some value on a guy like Norby. -
Ideally, sure, but in a situation where you assume that you're only getting 5-6 years from that player before he leaves, I can understand trying to manage their time so that you get the maximum impact out of it. -
By Orioles0615 · Posted
yea McCann has been hot but eventually I would hope to see a better lineup vs lefties. I don't think they will DH Adley all year against them and have Cowser and Mullins play and use a different DH -
By Bemorewins · Posted
Do you think that Mountcastle could land us a frontline starting pitcher? Otherwise, there's really no use in trading him. He has been one of the best hitters on the team and is still relatively young. Also, it might take trading Norby AND Stowers to get back a difference making starting pitcher. Would you be comfortable with that? Or do you think it would be better for him to be the 10th - 12th hitter on the team next year. I ask because with so many top level talents/potential star players, the need or use for 10- 12 bench players is not that high (think ATL Braves). However, we are one more top notch starter (especially once Bradish returns) from being the best team in baseball bar none. Plus, if we are not going to resign Burnes, we will need someone up at or near the top of the rotation next season (even if Bradish is there and healthy) if we want to put ourselves in the best position possible to win it all. -
By Sports Guy · Posted
I think most people’s minds are conditioned that a player has to play everyday. We don’t see teams playing a lot of guys some. We see teams that normally put out the same lineups everyday and play the same players most of the time. But the reality is that shouldn’t be the case. We also don’t need young guys to come up and play every single day to justify them being here. They can play 2-4 times a week and get PH appearances. When the player is “old enough” and has nothing left to prove in the minors, you get them up here even if it’s just on a part time basis for a while until things get figured out.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
-
Popular Now
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.