Jump to content

Offseason target: Josh Reddick?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Josh Reddick strikes me as one of those hitters who would flourish playing in Camden Yards and the other AL East stadiums. He's only had two seasons over 20 homers (including 32 in 2012), but I'd bet he'd hit close to 30 in an Orioles uniform if we could keep him healthy. He'd also be a defensive upgrade for us. I'd like to see us explore him this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Josh Reddick strikes me as one of those hitters who would flourish playing in Camden Yards and the other AL East stadiums. He's only had two seasons over 20 homers (including 32 in 2012), but I'd bet he'd hit close to 30 in an Orioles uniform if we could keep him healthy. He'd also be a defensive upgrade for us. I'd like to see us explore him this offseason.

Maybe they will Frobby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh Reddick strikes me as one of those hitters who would flourish playing in Camden Yards and the other AL East stadiums. He's only had two seasons over 20 homers (including 32 in 2012), but I'd bet he'd hit close to 30 in an Orioles uniform if we could keep him healthy. He'd also be a defensive upgrade for us. I'd like to see us explore him this offseason.

His injury history is a bit of a concern though. His OPS+ numbers look good but his OBP is I guess average. I do think an OF with him and Jones and our platoon in LF would be an upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd beware of a player who's about to turn 30, has had injury issues and just had the worst year of his career. He might have a bounce back season, but the odds are not good with age, health and performance all going the wrong way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reddick will be 30 in February and as a FA he will be expensive. Not what the O's need IMO. They need to add young cheap, talented players and RF is one of few places they can make that kind of addition. JMO.

Just curious as to who you think a good target could be for the O's? Do we trade Britton or Tillman to get that guy? Teams are not usually willing, especially with the escalation of salaries, to give away young, productive players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reddick will be 30 in February and as a FA he will be expensive. Not what the O's need IMO. They need to add young cheap, talented players and RF is one of few places they can make that kind of addition. JMO.

I don't think he would be that expensive, which is kind of my point. I'm thinking you could get him on a 1-2 year deal for less than $10 mm/yr. Maybe I'm wrong about that.

How are we going to add a young, cheap RF? By trading someone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reddick will be 30 in February and as a FA he will be expensive. Not what the O's need IMO. They need to add young cheap, talented players and RF is one of few places they can make that kind of addition. JMO.
Who do you have in mind? None like that are FA next year and who are you trading?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he would be that expensive, which is kind of my point. I'm thinking you could get him on a 1-2 year deal for less than $10 mm/yr. Maybe I'm wrong about that.

How are we going to add a young, cheap RF? By trading someone?

He'll get more than that IMO, he's the best of a poor OF market. Excepting Cespedis and Bautista.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he would be that expensive, which is kind of my point. I'm thinking you could get him on a 1-2 year deal for less than $10 mm/yr. Maybe I'm wrong about that.

How are we going to add a young, cheap RF? By trading someone?

I'd bet he's closer to 3/36

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd bet he's closer to 3/36

Possible. I haven't done a close examination of the 2016-17 FA class. The reason I think it may be less is that Reddick has been pretty fragile over the years, only exceeding 115 games twice. It's risky to give a guy like that a lot of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I was and still am a Means defender.   Velocity is not John's game.   In 2019 his average 4 seamer was 91.7 mph.   But his changeup was 80.9 mph and his curve was 77 mph according to Statcast.  John went 12-11 with a 3.60 ERA that year.   Its the different in the speeds of the pitches that makes John effective. According to the information I found about a Texas pitcher in 2022 come off TJ surgery the O's can and I think probably will apply to MLB for another month of rehab in 10 day increments.   John's comeback story is far from over IMO.
    • Count me in I was there, see above post.
    • We stole two of the three games against KC when they came to Baltimore two weeks ago, and everybody knows it. My guess is they'll have a chip on their shoulder about that. They out-hit us and out-homered us in our own park, and an unlucky bounce here or there and we could have been swept. I know the Brewers blew us out two of three, but IMO the Royals are the best team we've face so far. I'm expecting to lose a couple in KC but wouldn't be surprised if we lost all three.  
    • Different times. The Champion 1894 Orioles averaged about 165-170 pounds a man, and Big Dan Brouthers weighed in at 207. At least according to bb-ref.
    • Copying and pasting from my phone which isn’t ideal.      Speed is the name of the game. Just as major-league teams are working on models that can help them make decisions faster, so do public analysts trying to help people beat the line, win that overall prize, or at least beat their college friends in that fantasy league. In the effort to make better decisions faster, we have a few statistics that can aid our efforts: • Fastball velocity stabilizes quickly — three starts should reliably predict the rest of the season. • Relatedly, Stuff+ becomes meaningful after as little as one start, at least when it comes to fastballs and sliders. • Strikeout-minus-walk rate is one of the most powerful small-sample tools.   —————-   Burnes:   Stuff+ told us before the season that Burnes had a great curveball that he could feature more, so it shouldn't be a surprise that he's done exactly that in Baltimore. He's also seen his fastball velocity return to 2022 levels. The result has been vintage Burnes, at a time when it seems like all the aces are falling around him. Long-term park factors are funky in Baltimore — with the new dimensions, Burnes should easily put up a low-threes ERA with plenty of strikeouts.   —————— G-Rod:   Like with this teammate Burnes, you can expect Rodriguez to beat this ERA projection. He now has two fastballs and two secondaries that are elite in terms of physical characteristics, so it's a full arsenal. Even using last year's data to improve the sample size, he's shown above-average command of four pitches, too. The only question mark is the fact that he lacks a slider. The cutter isn't great — overuse of that pitch early last season is what got him in trouble — and he hasn't consistently thrown a hard breaking ball. Otherwise, he's golden Grayson.        
    • I tried to do some @Just Regularkinda writing in the opener
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...