Jump to content

Buck Hates Kim


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

Enough is enough. Buck is on record as being against bunting in almost all circumstances. You have Hardy, a slow runner, on 1B. A successful bunt does not get him to sac fly position. Kim has been our best hitter and he is up against a RHP. There is absolutely no reason to take him out. Take him out for defense, fine. Sit him against lefties, fine. Buck has treated Kim like dirt since day one. I do not get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 495
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think I would rather have had Bourn pinch run for Hardy, and either have Kim bunt or have Bourn take a chance at stealing 2B.

And I know that you don't know how that would have turned out, but Bourn would have been beaten that throw at home by a mile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enough is enough. Buck is on record as being against bunting in almost all circumstances. You have Hardy, a slow runner, on 1B. A successful bunt does not get him to sac fly position. Kim has been our best hitter and he is up against a RHP. There is absolutely no reason to take him out. Take him out for defense, fine. Sit him against lefties, fine. Buck has treated Kim like dirt since day one. I do not get it.

I assumed Bourn would pinch run for Hardy, not hit for Kim. Makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know anything about Kim's bunting ability, and that was one of the few situations where a sac bunt can actually be a fine idea. But I also thought it was strange decision.

I can understand Buck's thinking though. If the game went extra innings, he wanted to keep Hardy's glove and arm at SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know anything about Kim's bunting ability, and that was one of the few situations where a sac bunt can actually be a fine idea. But I also thought it was strange decision.

Point is, he's a good hitter. Perhaps Bourn (as a runner) could have made it to 3rd on a base hit to RF as Kim should have been swinging away, not bunting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell me the explanation then. There is no other explanation for treating Kim like dirt throughout the season and this decision in particular defies any rational sense.

I am pretty sure Buck doesn't like Kim. Perhaps he doesn't want to succeed because he tried to get rid of him in spring training and doesn't want to admit he was wrong. Maybe he feels DD forced him to keep Kim and he resents it. But to keep playing guys who fail over and over again instead of Kim has made no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That explains why you don't PR Bourn. Why do you take out Kim when he is your best hitter vs RHP?

Because Buck called for a bunt, and Bourn is fast enough that he could out possibly outrun the bunt. If Buck wanted the hitter to swing away I'm sure he would have left Kim in. Bourn muffed the bunt though. Can't blame Buck for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...