Jump to content

Buck Hates Kim


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

Enough is enough. Buck is on record as being against bunting in almost all circumstances. You have Hardy, a slow runner, on 1B. A successful bunt does not get him to sac fly position. Kim has been our best hitter and he is up against a RHP. There is absolutely no reason to take him out. Take him out for defense, fine. Sit him against lefties, fine. Buck has treated Kim like dirt since day one. I do not get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 495
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think I would rather have had Bourn pinch run for Hardy, and either have Kim bunt or have Bourn take a chance at stealing 2B.

And I know that you don't know how that would have turned out, but Bourn would have been beaten that throw at home by a mile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enough is enough. Buck is on record as being against bunting in almost all circumstances. You have Hardy, a slow runner, on 1B. A successful bunt does not get him to sac fly position. Kim has been our best hitter and he is up against a RHP. There is absolutely no reason to take him out. Take him out for defense, fine. Sit him against lefties, fine. Buck has treated Kim like dirt since day one. I do not get it.

I assumed Bourn would pinch run for Hardy, not hit for Kim. Makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know anything about Kim's bunting ability, and that was one of the few situations where a sac bunt can actually be a fine idea. But I also thought it was strange decision.

I can understand Buck's thinking though. If the game went extra innings, he wanted to keep Hardy's glove and arm at SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know anything about Kim's bunting ability, and that was one of the few situations where a sac bunt can actually be a fine idea. But I also thought it was strange decision.

Point is, he's a good hitter. Perhaps Bourn (as a runner) could have made it to 3rd on a base hit to RF as Kim should have been swinging away, not bunting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell me the explanation then. There is no other explanation for treating Kim like dirt throughout the season and this decision in particular defies any rational sense.

I am pretty sure Buck doesn't like Kim. Perhaps he doesn't want to succeed because he tried to get rid of him in spring training and doesn't want to admit he was wrong. Maybe he feels DD forced him to keep Kim and he resents it. But to keep playing guys who fail over and over again instead of Kim has made no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That explains why you don't PR Bourn. Why do you take out Kim when he is your best hitter vs RHP?

Because Buck called for a bunt, and Bourn is fast enough that he could out possibly outrun the bunt. If Buck wanted the hitter to swing away I'm sure he would have left Kim in. Bourn muffed the bunt though. Can't blame Buck for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • People keep talking about Norby's flawed defense, meanwhile Holliday is looking pretty bad out there. Small sample size, I guess! But how long is the leash?
    • the Royals gave us the business tonight...except for the slam by Adley...we stunk to high hell tonight...especially the pen...Akin and  Tate...they both came up small.
    • I know this isn’t the question that you asked, but my recollection is that you worked on the business side for the Orioles at some point, so I think you might be able to weigh in on this idea: do you think there are business reasons to extend a Gunnar or an Adley? I know you’re view is generally that extensions are overrated by the fanbase, but that largely seems related to the idea that you are paying for past-peak years (if I’m off base here, it wasn’t intentional—just my recollection). I tend to think that from a business standpoint, an extension for a young player would not make a material difference concerning the amount of tickets sold, revenue generated, etc. and would really just make some people on X happy, but I don’t really have anything to support that opinion.
    • The way he is pitching that's like throwing gas on a fire.
    • I don't think Elias will seriously entertain bringing back Santander.
    • Left the game with 1 run in and 2 on ,2 outs in the 6th and Akin gave up both runs. Bad luck tonight in my opinion but I'm sure there are many on here will say he sucks and should be replaced. 
    • Yeah, we're kind of getting off track here since this is a Jackson Holliday thread, but I will say I don't see how Mountcastle gets traded -- and even if he did it would be to unblock Mayo and not Kjerstad.  Both Mounty and Mayo are righties, and it doesn't look like Mayo will play third base anytime soon.  I think two of the prospects need to get traded -- maybe in the offseason or next season -- unless Hays, O'Hearn or Mounty are dealt.  I think there's a chance the O's bring back Santander, but that's a big wildcard too.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...