+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 105
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    151
    Toronto is big market.

    It more than twice Baltimore.

    Wikipedia lists it as 5th largest metropolitan area in North America (Which includes Mexico City which doesn't even factor in to this discussion).

  2. #47
    Birds of B'more's Avatar
    Birds of B'more is offline Plus Member Since 07/05 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    9,295
    Quote Originally Posted by Mackus
    MLB defines the markets, and yes, Toronto gets the TV revnues from all of Canada.

    Other oddities in the markets include New York and Seattle splitting all of Japan. Anaheim has the rights to (I believe) all broadcasts in Spanish-speaking countries.

    Expect Toronto to continue to spend money and start making some noise in the East.
    Wha-wha-what?!?! And here I thought the economics of baseball were messed up before I read that post. Are you serious? The Angels own the broadcast rights to all of Latin America? Who in the hell decided that is how it would work? Did Arte Moreno pay an enormous sum of money to the other owners for these rights? What happens if MLB eventually expands/relocates to Mexico like they considered w/the Expos? Will they have to negotiate with Moreno like they did PA? And why do Seattle and NY get to keep all of the broadcast money from Japan just because of Ichiro and Matsui? The money from foreign markets should be divided evenly..........although I'd be willing to concede all of Canada to Toronto.

  3. #48
    NewMarketSean's Avatar
    NewMarketSean is offline Plus member Since 05/04 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    New Market, MD
    Posts
    34,409
    Yes, Toronto is a huge city. I've never been there, but I've heard it rivals NYC in it's grandness. That said it is still a Canadian city and baseball is America's past-time. There is going to be fall off. Plus the Skydome is pushing 20 years and isn't the "new and trendy" place to go in Toronto anymore.

    They are a huge market, yes, and they may get a big TV deal, but I still don't see them being able to compete with the NYY and the Red Sox anytime soon.

    If the Canadian Dollar surpasses the US Dollar, which could happen sooner than we expect, then we could be seeing something like this take place. But not until then.

    It's a Canadian city... it's an American sport.

  4. #49
    Birds of B'more's Avatar
    Birds of B'more is offline Plus Member Since 07/05 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    9,295
    Quote Originally Posted by NewMarketSean
    Yes, Toronto is a huge city. I've never been there, but I've heard it rivals NYC in it's grandness. That said it is still a Canadian city and baseball is America's past-time. There is going to be fall off. Plus the Skydome is pushing 20 years and isn't the "new and trendy" place to go in Toronto anymore.

    They are a huge market, yes, and they may get a big TV deal, but I still don't see them being able to compete with the NYY and the Red Sox anytime soon.

    If the Canadian Dollar surpasses the US Dollar, which could happen sooner than we expect, then we could be seeing something like this take place. But not until then.

    It's a Canadian city... it's an American sport.
    I also believe Canadian sports franchises get hit with taxes much harder than their American counterparts.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,207
    For those still wondering about the Blue Jays TV network, they're on Rogers SportsNet. Yes, the same cable company which now has its name on the former Skydome. Rogers bought majority interest in the team six years ago and has allowed Ricciardi to tear down then rebuild the team entirely.

    Rogers SportsNet is like a national version of CSN. It carries the ESPN games on Sunday night and a lot of Mariners games on the West Coast feed. It also picks up a lot of other games such as YES network broadcast when the Jays aren't playing.

    TSN, their version of ESPN, used to show about 10 Jays games a year. I don't think they do anymore.

    Anyway, this is a situation where the team didn't start its own RSN; it was bought into one.

  6. #51
    NewMarketSean's Avatar
    NewMarketSean is offline Plus member Since 05/04 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    New Market, MD
    Posts
    34,409
    Quote Originally Posted by howie14
    For those still wondering about the Blue Jays TV network, they're on Rogers SportsNet. Yes, the same cable company which now has its name on the former Skydome. Rogers bought majority interest in the team six years ago and has allowed Ricciardi to tear down then rebuild the team entirely.

    Rogers SportsNet is like a national version of CSN. It carries the ESPN games on Sunday night and a lot of Mariners games on the West Coast feed. It also picks up a lot of other games such as YES network broadcast when the Jays aren't playing.

    TSN, their version of ESPN, used to show about 10 Jays games a year. I don't think they do anymore.

    Anyway, this is a situation where the team didn't start its own RSN; it was bought into one.
    Funny... the BJ's land a huge TV deal and they start spending immediately.

    The O's land a huge TV deal and they cut payroll.


  7. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Gulf Shores, AL
    Posts
    25,637
    Quote Originally Posted by Birds of B'more
    Wha-wha-what?!?! And here I thought the economics of baseball were messed up before I read that post. Are you serious? The Angels own the broadcast rights to all of Latin America? Who in the hell decided that is how it would work? ... And why do Seattle and NY get to keep all of the broadcast money from Japan just because of Ichiro and Matsui? The money from foreign markets should be divided evenly...
    No kidding. How-and-when did this happen? Does anyone know?

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    151
    The point is that the Blue Jays do have some economic advantages over the Orioles.

    But I certainly don't want to make excuses for PA.

  9. #54
    NewMarketSean's Avatar
    NewMarketSean is offline Plus member Since 05/04 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    New Market, MD
    Posts
    34,409
    Quote Originally Posted by Bird_Man
    The point is that the Blue Jays do have some economic advantages over the Orioles.

    But I certainly don't want to make excuses for PA.
    Yeah but when it all evens out the BJ's are probably closer to the O's financial situation than the Red Sox or the Yankees.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Canton
    Posts
    32,658
    Quote Originally Posted by Sports Guy
    But i get your point. If they truly wanted him, they should have offered him 5/70 to get it done. I am glad they didn't, as he is not worth that but still, to get what you want(if you are the O's), you have to offer more.
    The story we got was that the Orioles were ready to increase their offer, but Konerko and his people told them that he made the decision to stay in Chicago so he wouldn't have to uproot his family. He basically asked the Orioles to stop tempting him with more money.

    Flanagan also described Konerko as the most genuine free agent he'd ever dealt with, so he clearly was interested in coming here, but decided not to move his family.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,207
    Quote Originally Posted by NewMarketSean
    Funny... the BJ's land a huge TV deal and they start spending immediately.

    The O's land a huge TV deal and they cut payroll.

    To be fair, the Orioles don't have a huge TV deal until next year and the deal will probably lose money until the Comcast issues are settled. If Comcast worms its way into the deal to the extent I fear, the Orioles may not make much more than the current deal off of the RSN at all. Still, the point is well taken.


    Yeah but when it all evens out the BJ's are probably closer to the O's financial situation than the Red Sox or the Yankees.
    Also true. Interestingly, the Jays were owned previously by Labatt's Breweries. You would think they would have deep pockets as well, but once that early '90s team was broken up, they didn't spend maney at all.

  12. #57
    mikezpen is offline Plus Member Since 03/06 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    7,244
    Actually, we signed a free-agent catcher, a first baseman, traded for a reliever and a starter, and brought up a highly-touted rookie outfieder.
    Actaully, that's not much of anything. Hernandez is a good player but not a 4th or 5th place hitter. The "highly-touted rookie outfielder" coming up here was not part of any "plan". He made the team out of ST and has flopped since.The first basemen (Millar? Conine?) are cheap bench material who represent no improvement. They traded for a starting pitcher who isn't even .500 lifetime. WOW.In other words, the Orioles addressed none of their crying needs-a number one starter and middle-of-the-order hitting.

    Plus, last time I checked we were still on pace to score an above-average number of runs for the season with this "failure" of an offense.
    The offense is a failure now, it will be moreso when the season ends. The Orioles' hitting is carried by a few guys-same as it was last year.Take a few of them away or bring on a slump, and the weaknesses of this undermanned, cheaply-assembled roster are exposed. Since the injuries hit some key people and they can't carry of team anymore, the offense HAS been a failure.What are we since Roberts went down, 3-8?

    Personally, I would rather not see the Orioles risk their future on highly-paid mediocre players, but that's just the sensible part of me.
    No, apparently you'd rather see them sign microscopically-paid submediocre players as you eagerly await the World Champion Orioles of 2027.

    As for Konerko, he was never coming here.And I think that's exactly why they could make that offer. If they'd seriously wanted to spend that kind of money on the team, they would have done it after they failed to get Konerko.They could have certainly signed better people than Millar and Conine or traded for them. Instead, they did nothing.

    And what's up with this talk of being ashamed? I'm ashamed of nothing. The O's should be ashamed of not giving their fans a better product.
    SO TRUE SO TRUE SO TRUE SO TRUE SO TRUE.
    Last edited by mikezpen; 05-12-2006 at 02:57 PM.

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    501
    So, I am still kinda confused, are we mad because Toronto has been in third place instead of fourth for the last 8 years, or because they are in third place, instead of fourth now

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,207
    Quote Originally Posted by badboydrake
    So, I am still kinda confused, are we mad because Toronto has been in third place instead of fourth for the last 8 years, or because they are in third place, instead of fourth now
    I don't think there is actually an "official" OH reason for anger. I'm guessing the point behind this is that these were two teams who appeared to both be spinning wheels behing the division leader and now one of them, the "Not-Orioles", seems to actually have a rebuilding plan.

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    504
    Quote Originally Posted by NewMarketSean


    Neither am I. I'm just pointing out the facts. And when they aren't facts -- they are about as close to FACT as you can get.
    What are the "facts" that Konerko bid was just a rouse? Like I said before, this theory could maybe make sense if this rouse was somehow leveraged later on. And even that isn't really conclusive evidence.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

OriolesHangout.com is an unofficial site and not associated with the Baltimore Orioles and part of Hangout Ventures LLC. Copyright ©2013 | Privacy Policy | Advertise with us