+ Reply to Thread
Results 106 to 120 of 328
-
07-21-2006 02:09 PM #106
By everything does it mean that even a trade of, for example, Hawkins, that Angelos' approval would be needed?
If so that is really sad.
-
07-21-2006 02:11 PM #107Judging by how things still operate, it would not appear so.
Originally Posted by RZNJ
-
07-21-2006 02:11 PM #108
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 500
Why can't people see what is going on here? PA is hoarding as much revenue as he can before selling this team. He is not about to actually lose money spending for over paid players. He will bail like a former owner of a Baltimore sports franchise did.
Originally Posted by mikezpen
-
07-21-2006 02:11 PM #109Angelos is the GM...
Originally Posted by TonySoprano
-
07-21-2006 02:12 PM #110
Thanks Tony for that report. Just sounds all so depressing. Even a good start by Bedard tonight won't make me feel better.
I think we (you guys in Maryland) should definatly do something about Angelos.
Tony, which direction do you think the franchise is taking? Do you think we have a chance to compete any time soon?
Thanks
-
07-21-2006 02:12 PM #111Apparently there was no veto. So the question is what is a reasonable time for Angelos to sign off on a deal? I understand (what I think is) your viewpoint that Angelos should set boundaries and tell the baseball guys to have at it as long as they don't exceed them. I know how I would rather work as a GM but I'm not sure how often that happens anywhere in sports without a final approval.
Originally Posted by Flosman
-
07-21-2006 02:13 PM #112I disagree. I think he's going to hold on to the team and pass it down to his kids the way Jack Kent Cooke did. Then, just like "Raljohn," the dirt won't even be covering Peter's casket before they sell the team.
Originally Posted by shotgunschell
-
07-21-2006 02:14 PM #113No offense Skywalker.. but your comments contradict eachother... you now know the truth.. stop looking for someone to tell you want you want to hear.. mobilize to help exact some change...
Originally Posted by Skywalker76
-
07-21-2006 02:15 PM #114Why wouldn't he have traded Tejada, if that were the case?
Originally Posted by shotgunschell
It doesn't make sense to say that he's just in it for the money.
He's in it for his ego, bottom line.
-
07-21-2006 02:15 PM #115My heart tells me to hope so, but who knows? I like the baseball people involved with the orioles right now, they are quality baseball men. If they are allowed to do their jobs with interfearence or micromangement we'd have a better chance.
Originally Posted by Skywalker76
-
07-21-2006 02:18 PM #116Tony:
Originally Posted by Tony-OH
Would you mind writing up a little story for the main page? It might help clarify and avoid confusion.
Also, I emailed Roch Kubatko a link to this thread, but a brief item on the main page would be easier to direct people to.
I think that the sooner that people in the mainstream media get into this, the better. For some reason, there are a lot of respected national sports reporters who have covered the Orioles and would be interested in this story. I am thinking especially of Buster Olney, who, like Roch, runs a blog and definitely reads his email and feedback.
-
07-21-2006 02:21 PM #117
Plus Member Since 04/04
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Canton
- Posts
- 32,658
I don't think it was ever brought up specifically.
Originally Posted by RZNJ
The closest I think we got to specifically dealing with Angelos meddling was the very first thing we talked about, which was the Mora contract. This was right after the Peter Schmuck article that said "Mora's contract is sitting on Angelos' desk" came out. After the introductions, Mrs. Flanagan started the evening of by (somewhat sarcastically/jokingly in an ice-breaking sort of way) said "So Mike, why is Melvin's contract sitting on Peter's desk?" Flanny then explained that it wasn't actually sitting on Peter's desk, but it was with Mora's agent.
Looking back I wish I had planned a few things ahead of time that I wanted to talk about and written them down. It would have been interesting to hear about the Townsend deal, what was going on with Burnett last year, and a handful of other things. We ended up talking more about the current state of the team, various free agents and trades that didn't happen (mostly Konerko, Delgado, Vlad, Lee, and ARod) and then just general things about the job and team.
-
07-21-2006 02:24 PM #118
Released
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Bethesda
- Posts
- 500
It appears that he's already having a difficult time getting talented FO and management types to come to the Orioles. A very public resignation by people like Flanagan will only make that problem worse, and it will get harder and harder for Angelos to find anyone with MLB experience to work in the FO. The universe of those people with MLB experience is very small, and many of them will refuse to come to the orioles if they know what to expect. Sure, he'll find people to take those jobs, but even Angelos at some point will realize that he needs minimally competent people. Will the threat of a mass resignation have an effect on Angelos? I don't know, but if I worked there I'd seriously consider it.They have good, well-paying jobs. Angelos could get a lot of people to take their places.
They have no leverage over Angelos.
As far as people needing the jobs and being unwilling to give them up -- above someone mentioned the rumor that Duquette might leave soon b/c he's fed up. I don't see any reason to doubt that rumor. I'm sure Duquette feels that he can get another job and is only willing to take so much from Angelos. Many people in the FO probably feel the same way. At some point pride and self-respect trumps the need for the paycheck.
-
07-21-2006 02:25 PM #119You've got the right idea. If we could get Rosenthal and Olney - two guys who remember what the O's used to be - to write critical pieces at once, maybe we would have something.
Originally Posted by FellsPointOsFan
-
07-21-2006 02:26 PM #120
Board National League Analyst
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 8,559
Thanks for the information Tony.
It's a real shame that you and the other diehard O's fans around here have to put up with this nonsense.
FWIW, I do recall hearing that our guy Jim Hendry got extremely angry/frustrated with the O's FO during the Tejada/Prior talks last offseason, to the point where he had to walk away. I'd like to believe that Hendry wouldn't let that experience prevent him from dealing with the O's in the future (actually they did, on Patterson), but on some level it has to have an effect. If that same negativity is spreading around the league, that's not a good thing.
It'd be just as bad if the FO was getting a bad rep with agents who represent FA's the O's would want. There are rumblings of that too, stemming from the Burnitz ugliness.
All in all, an unfortunate situation.


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks