+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 127
-
07-28-2006 03:48 PM #1
O's offer Tejada to Angels for 3 prospects
Sorry if this has already been posted..
http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister...le_1224895.php
-
07-28-2006 03:50 PM #2
Theres only 1 prospect in that offer
-
07-28-2006 03:51 PM #3
Plus Member Since 06/06
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 5,105
I'd like this rumor if all of it were true except for the Angel's passing.
-
07-28-2006 03:52 PM #4
Plus Member since 03/02
Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 8,924
Originally Posted by Bigbie03
I would turn that down too.
-
07-28-2006 03:52 PM #5
Now that is a real offer, unlike that Astros crap. I would do that deal without Shields and would prefer a prospect that the Anels would give up (rather than a valuable piece for their playoff run). Unfortunately, we aren't getting Santana or Weaver, so it doesn't matter.
-
07-28-2006 03:52 PM #6
Plus Member - Major League Hangouter
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Miami
- Posts
- 2,978
That would be a hell of a package to get. I'd personally be very happy.
Imagine a 07 opening day rotation of Santana, Bedard, Cabrera, Penn, and Loewen.
Olson, Liz, and James Johnson waiting in AAA.
-
07-28-2006 03:52 PM #7
My bad..But at least it appears we're trying to do something.
-
07-28-2006 03:53 PM #8
Wow... nice offer by the O's! If I were the Angels, I too would turn it down. I like the aggressiveness on the O's behalf. Start high!
-
07-28-2006 03:54 PM #9
Originally Posted by bigbird
Why? Santana & Kendrick alone is pretty good even without Shields. Have you heard antyhing better? This blows away Hirsch & Pence & whatever from the Astros. Santana is already pretty proven & Kendrick is on his way too.
Oops! You mean you'd turn it down if you were the Angels?
-
07-28-2006 03:55 PM #10While the article has todays date on it, that information seems to be old.. wasn't that reported about a week ago?
Originally Posted by Bigbie03
-
07-28-2006 03:55 PM #11Not that I'm Bigbird, but I think he's saying if he was the Angels he'd turn that down also.
Originally Posted by RZNJ
-
07-28-2006 03:56 PM #12
He meant if he were the Angels...
-
07-28-2006 03:57 PM #13Problem is, those guys are pretty established MLers now. You offer that two months ago and you might have something. But why would they trade three CURRENT ML contributors for ONE current ML contributor?
Originally Posted by RZNJ
Wood, Adenhart and Aybar.
-
07-28-2006 03:58 PM #14
Plus Member since 03/02
Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 8,924
Exactly.....
Originally Posted by erb8472
-
07-28-2006 03:58 PM #15I hadn't heard before today that that offer was actually made and rejected. I know I've heard that proposal (and about a million others
Originally Posted by Fan4Life
) here on OH, but I don't recall hearing official confirmation of it until today.


Reply With Quote


Bookmarks