Two pitchers in the Roberts deal so we can leave Morrow out of the Seattle deal??????
You were expecting Brandon Wood back for BRob or some stud SS prospect? You take chances. If Cedeno put up a .750 OPS last year, we wouldn't be able to get him. Patterson has an advantage over Cedeno. He hasn't been exposed at the ML level yet. He also doesn't have a clear position.
His K rate AND HR rate are terrible...For a GB pitcher, his HR rate is very high.
And its not like his BB rate is low enough to justify his low BB rate.
On top of that, his numbers were in the NL, not AL.
You may be onto something though....May want this deal because of no Morrow....If no(ml ready) pitching comes back for Bedard, they may want depth from a BRob deal.
Not sure if I like the deal or not, I think we could get more.
Gallagher is the only piece that I like.
If it was possible I would ask for Epat and Cedano, but I think the Cubs would only give up one, but maybe not.
I guess if it would come down to the deal of Gallagher, Cedano, and Marshall, I would do it.
Then I would go after Truinfel from the M's, I would rather take him then Clement (not sure if the M's value Truinfel or Clement better).
Markakis line drive to right center. Did he do it. Yes he did! Markakis, with a grand slam! - Joe Angel
Markakis line drive to right center. Did he do it. Yes he did! Markakis, with a grand slam! - Joe Angel
[QUOTE=Pruke;1155717]Put me down in this camp.
I mean, how many major league pitchers can we have at any one time on the roster for cryin' out loud?
Gallagher
Marshall (does he come into the mix because we don't get Morrow???)
Albers
Patton
Loewen
Guthrie
Cabrera
Burres
...
Bedard?????
These dominoes will have to fall close to each other or the entire roster flex will get funky.
We'll have a roster with 30 pitchers and 10 position players!!!![/QU
I dont think they need to pitchers for Roberts Gallagher will do... If they did they should get a High Ceiling guy in the low minors who wouldn't have to be on the 40 man at this point!
The reason the Roberts deal hasn't been completely is said by rumor to be that AM wants to move Bedard first.
Tillman > Marshall
We should get a high ceiling prospect added in the deal...someone like Jose Ceda.
http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/m...pbp&pid=469167
Fine. I'll give you that Cedeno stunk until he got to AAA. However, he's performed well there in at least two different stints. That's not a fluke IMO. Also, there walk rates were pretty similar at AAA last year. If you want to look at career minor league numbers, you win. If you want to look at the last two years, then Cedeno has outhit Patterson at the highest level. How do you acount for the fact that Cedeno outhit Patterson by about 140 OPS points? SG would say it was luck. How about you?
BTW, how is this for progression in the minors.
Ronny Cedeno
2003 in A ball - 552 OPS
2004 in AA ball - 729 OPS
2005 in AAA balll -921 OPS
2007 in AAA ball - 957 OPS
He didn't do well in a full season in 2006 in the majors and lost his job after 74 AB's last year. Again, at leat we know he has a position he can play. I think he's worth taking a chance on. Patterson is the "sexier" prospect because he can run and because he hasn't been exposed yet, like 90% of the guys who come up.
Last edited by RZNJ; 01-06-2008 at 11:20 PM.
I dont think they need 2 to pitchers for Roberts, Gallagher will do... If they did they should get a High Ceiling guy (potential #1) in the low minors who wouldn't have to be on the 40 man at this point!
The reason the Roberts deal hasn't been completely is said by rumor to be that AM wants to move Bedard first.
OriolesHangout.com is an unofficial site and not associated with the Baltimore Orioles and part of Hangout Ventures LLC. Copyright ©2011 | Privacy Policy | Advertise with us
Bookmarks