1. #46
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Augusta, ME
    Posts
    36,839
    Quote Originally Posted by Hank Scorpio View Post
    I thought you hated that deal for Oakland? Beane took a substandard package, etc???
    He did what he wanted to do, which was get back quantity. Beane set the market instead of waiting for the market to be set and then trying to use the price before the market was set, which is what MacPhail is doing. Beane has identified players he wants and he's making deals to improve his club, unlike MacPhail who just likes to talk about improving his...

    Had MacPhail actually traded Bedard before Haren was traded he would be recieving the players he wanted, but since he waited, Haren was traded and Bedard's value dropped. Now he's going to have to settle instead of continuing to have an unrealistic price tag for Bedard, otherwise Bedard will be an Oriole on Opening Day.

    If MacPhail is actually serious about rebuilding Bedard has to go this offseason, otherwise you waste the best opportunity to maximize the return for him. He's waited until Haren got traded and will most likely wait for a Santana trade which will net a package of only one stud prospect such as Hughes/Buchholz/Ellsbury. The longer MacPhail waits, the lower Bedard's value is going to go...
    Last edited by JTrea81; 01-05-2008 at 08:13 PM.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    410

    Little Lord Fontenot

    All this talk of Cubs' prospects while our old prospect has done a decent job in the bigs.

    Fontenot seems to be in Chicago's plans for the future.

    Damn this deal better go down.
    Cedeno is ABSOLUTELY ready to play everyday in the show.

  3. #48
    vatech1994's Avatar
    vatech1994 is offline Plus Member since 03/03 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    10,920
    Quote Originally Posted by JTrea81 View Post
    Had MacPhail actually traded Bedard before Haren was traded he would be recieving the players he wanted, but since he waited, Haren was traded and Bedard's value dropped.
    You keep typing stuff like this like it is a fact. Do you actually believe it to be fact? If so, can you please cite your source.

    If it is your opinion, can you please explain to me why you believe this to be true and support it?

  4. #49
    Lucky Jim's Avatar
    Lucky Jim is offline Plus Member since 12/06 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY.
    Posts
    18,008
    Quote Originally Posted by vatech1994 View Post
    You keep typing stuff like this like it is a fact. Do you actually believe it to be fact? If so, can you please cite your source.

    If it is your opinion, can you please explain to me why you believe this to be true and support it?
    It's epidemic around here.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Augusta, ME
    Posts
    36,839
    Quote Originally Posted by vatech1994 View Post
    You keep typing stuff like this like it is a fact. Do you actually believe it to be fact? If so, can you please cite your source.

    If it is your opinion, can you please explain to me why you believe this to be true and support it?
    Well Beane was asking for 3-4 blue chippers for Haren to start with according to this article:

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../SPRMTNE39.DTL

    That's pretty much the equivalent to what MacPhail is asking from teams for Bedard. I have no doubt Beane could have got 3 blue chip prospects for Haren, yet he decided he wanted more than three players so he took less talent to get more players from Arizona.

    Now had Beane held out say until after Bedard was traded, the price tag for Haren would still be 3-4 blue chip prospects. Therefore MacPhail would be justified in asking for three top prospects, but Haren was dealt before Bedard. Beane took less and now MacPhail looks unreasonable for not realizing the market price for Bedard has changed. Had MacPhail set the market before Beane traded Haren, I think he could actually get the players he wanted with the exception of Bruce.
    Last edited by JTrea81; 01-05-2008 at 08:44 PM.

  6. #51
    Goop's Avatar
    Goop is offline Plus Member Since 8/07 All-Star Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    3,269
    I've been hoping that Marshall would blossom more. I followed him when he pitched for VCU, and he pitched well for them while he was in college.

    He also dated my girlfriends' best friends' sorority sister, which practically makes us family, and family should hook each other up with tickets!

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Harrisonburg, Va.
    Posts
    162
    Marshall played collegiately at VCU and continues to haunt me to this day. Personally, I hoped to never have to see him again.

  8. #53
    Goop's Avatar
    Goop is offline Plus Member Since 8/07 All-Star Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    3,269
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Mad View Post
    Marshall played collegiately at VCU and continues to haunt me to this day. Personally, I hoped to never have to see him again.
    Did you play against him?

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by Sports Guy View Post
    Right...Murton is much better than Marshall.

    Marshall is a borderline 5th starter in the AL IMO.
    I guess if Cedeno is the toss in, then Marshall becomes the 2nd piece and I think a ML Starter (5th or otherwise) isn't necessarily a bad thing.

    I cannot help but think they're lining up to trade off some of this glut of pitching at some point next year in the hopes of picking up a key bat or 2.

  10. #55
    markpolis is offline Plus Member since 02/03 All-Star Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    3,143
    Quote Originally Posted by JTrea81 View Post
    Well Beane was asking for 3-4 blue chippers for Haren to start with according to this article:

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../SPRMTNE39.DTL

    That's pretty much the equivalent to what MacPhail is asking from teams for Bedard. I have no doubt Beane could have got 3 blue chip prospects for Haren, yet he decided he wanted more than three players so he took less talent to get more players from Arizona.

    Now had Beane held out say until after Bedard was traded, the price tag for Haren would still be 3-4 blue chip prospects. Therefore MacPhail would be justified in asking for three top prospects, but Haren was dealt before Bedard. Beane took less and now MacPhail looks unreasonable for not realizing the market price for Bedard has changed. Had MacPhail set the market before Beane traded Haren, I think he could actually get the players he wanted with the exception of Bruce.
    If the Twins trade Santana and get 4 blue chips prospects does that once again change the market for Bedard? What if the Twins trade Santana to the Blue Jays or Red Sox? Hank Steinbrenner will probably flip out and offer his entire farm system for Bedard.

    There are way too many other unknown factors involved for your "black and white" conclusion on Bedard's decreased trade value.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Posts
    12,197
    Quote Originally Posted by Pruke View Post
    I guess if Cedeno is the toss in, then Marshall becomes the 2nd piece and I think a ML Starter (5th or otherwise) isn't necessarily a bad thing.

    I cannot help but think they're lining up to trade off some of this glut of pitching at some point next year in the hopes of picking up a key bat or 2.
    Except that we have even more marginal 5th starters right now than we do DHs. Marshall doesn't have a whole lot of upside, especially if you throw him into the best hitting division in baseball. Trading away your best players needs to fill major needs and/or pick up guys with high upside who may be a risk but have the potential to be well above average players for us. "Not necessarily a bad thing" is what you trade Huff, Payton, Mora, etc. for just to be rid of their contracts and/or attitudes. It shouldn't be a significant part of a Roberts deal. Veal >>> Marshall IMO because while he's not a sure thing his potential is much higher.

  12. #57
    JohnnyK27's Avatar
    JohnnyK27 is offline Plus Member Since 01/08 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    11,846
    Quote Originally Posted by blueberryale77 View Post
    Except that we have even more marginal 5th starters right now than we do DHs. Marshall doesn't have a whole lot of upside, especially if you throw him into the best hitting division in baseball. Trading away your best players needs to fill major needs and/or pick up guys with high upside who may be a risk but have the potential to be well above average players for us. "Not necessarily a bad thing" is what you trade Huff, Payton, Mora, etc. for just to be rid of their contracts and/or attitudes. It shouldn't be a significant part of a Roberts deal. Veal >>> Marshall IMO because while he's not a sure thing his potential is much higher.

    I dont get why they'd want Cedeno over Patterson? Does anyone else?

    Forget Marshall they should try to get a high ceiling kid who's in the low minors as we have more pitchers than we have slots for this year!

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Posts
    12,197
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyK27 View Post
    I dont get why they'd want Cedeno over Patterson? Does anyone else?

    Forget Marshall they should try to get a high ceiling kid who's in the low minors as we have more pitchers than we have slots for this year!
    Maybe because Trembley's motto starts with "be on time..."

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    5,942
    Quote Originally Posted by JTrea81 View Post
    So this would mean a 2B man would be coming back in a Bedard deal, most likely Kendrick from the Angels or Chen from the Mariners. I don't think Cedeno would make an adequate second baseman.
    Why? If we get Cedeno it is to play SS, but why couldn't he shift to 2B?

  15. #60
    JohnnyK27's Avatar
    JohnnyK27 is offline Plus Member Since 01/08 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    11,846
    I'm certain they could straighten Patterson out... Patterson looks like he could replace Roberts at the lead off role. Cedeno well ???? I 'm not sure but 10 HR Power ...Not a lot of speed... We could get lucky & LH might hit 10

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

OriolesHangout.com is an unofficial site and not associated with the Baltimore Orioles and part of Hangout Ventures LLC. Copyright ©2013 | Privacy Policy | Advertise with us