Yes, they can tell that theres nothing that the Orioles can do to improve the team enough in the next two years to make Bedard or Roberts stay, so they should give him away asap.
Never mind the huge salary reduction to the payroll over the next 3 offseasons, or the players who will be available during that time. Lets ignore that and focus on trading Bedard and Roberts for whatever offer suits the Mariner, Reds or Angels.
Why is it one or the other? What is the probability that Bedard changes his mind? What is his value if he doesn't? What is the risk? For the right package, it's worth trading him. It's not, otherwise.
I don't think Roberts is a worry - he might stay if we compete. It's just that he'll be well into his 30s and likely in decline. And so his value is better in trade than for a team likely (not certain) to struggle for the next two years.
This is just baffling.
First of all, we're not just "giving" them away. I don't like to use the word "ignorance" because it's pretty strong, but this post smells like a cropdusting of it. We'd be getting some good pieces back in return. Kind of, like, you know, how Billy Beane has constructed the A's out west. But nah, I wouldn't want a team like that. Would you?
Nevermind the fact that none of us truly knows what players will be available over the next few years. I know that everyone likes to think that Tex will somehow fall in our lap and takes that for granted. What happens when ATL throws a serious offer at him to stay and he takes it?
The hypocrisy in your prior post is stunning, specifically where you talk about not knowing what'll happen, but then acting so sure that Reimold will pan out, and we'll end up with Blalock and Tex.
No feelings were hurt, in fact this is the only post contradicting me that hasn't referred to me as a lunatic or in other condescending ways. I just see a lot of negatives here if MacPhail waits and I'm just pointing things out the way I see them. In my opinion there is more evidence that MacPhail has nothing to gain by holding out, and everything to lose...
http://www.oriolesanonymous.com
Well you may be right. Time will tell how it works out. As for the trade to the Cubs if it happens i am fine with it.
Last edited by ChaosLex; 01-06-2008 at 04:59 PM.
I agree. Only thing I'm not too sure about is Jones' power potential. But by all accounts he should turn out to be a good player.
I think people are just apprehensive because they've never heard of or seen these players we're talking about acquiring. Therefore the easiest thing to do is just dismiss them and talk bad about them instead of exploring the possibilities they could bring to the future of this team.
Actually, I think most people on the board (obviously there will always be exceptions) would be quite happy with that return.
I think most "skeptics" of this trade are just questioning whether or not it's on the table and how strongly MacPhail believes something better will come up.
Very well said
They see that there best player is being traded and dont see the ML type players coming back.
These players are going to be the ML players you want back, it will just take more time.
Trading for multiple players who fill the needs of the team in the future is more important than having someone for 2 years.
Markakis line drive to right center. Did he do it. Yes he did! Markakis, with a grand slam! - Joe Angel
Not concerned at all with his power potential. If anything, his strike zone judgement is the only questionable thing about him in my mind, but that it isn't too big a deal for me.
Jones had a .272 ISO power in a heavy pitcher's park as a 22 year old. Plus power to all fields. And even if he never reaches his full offensive potential, he still saves you 10 - 20 runs per year at a premium defensive position.
Are you trying to be funny? If so, it isn't working. It matters a lot. I'm sure you know the difference between fact and opinion and that one shouldn't be confused with the other.
I've got no problem with you speculating so long as you call it speculation, opinion, whatever... I made this clear multiple times. That isn't what you've been doing.
Regarding "lot of evidence", there is no evidence at all that Bedard's value has gone down because of the Haren trade that I'm aware of and you certainly haven't offered any.
Again, this isn't true. I searched for insider posts indicating that we wanted all of Kemp, Kershaw, and LaRoche from the Dodgers or Bailey, Cueto, and Votto from the Reds or Jones, Clement, and Morrow from the Mariners and found nothing that indicated we wanted all three of these guys for just Bedard.
Here is what I found by team:
Dodgers
I found this post from Belkast for a combo of these guys but not Bedard by himself. There is nothing else out there mentioning these four names:
http://forum.orioleshangout.com/foru...earchid=131731
This post from Peace blatantly contradicts what you're saying here. There is nothing else out there:
http://forum.orioleshangout.com/foru...aw#post1111310
Nothing from BB in any of these posts supporting what you're saying:
http://forum.orioleshangout.com/foru...earchid=131736
I also have searched for media reports. I found nothing that wasn't contained in fan blogs.
Reds
I found nada from BB or Peace on us demanding this from the Reds. I found one post from Belkast contradicting it:
http://forum.orioleshangout.com/foru...to#post1138180
I found one article with this info, but it says "3 top prospects - probably Bailey, Votto, & Cueto" so it isn't very dependable
http://forum.orioleshangout.com/foru...to#post1138180
At least you couched this as an opinion. I disagree with you and I believe most analysts would disagree with everything you wrote here.
I think there are about 5 factors that you aren't even considering in this "analysis", but Lucky Jim hit on them pretty well and you responded with something that had nothing to do with his post so I'm going to save my fingers the wear and tear and move on.
I don't think there is anything I could write in response to your answer to this complex question that could discredit you any further than what you did to yourself, so I'm just going to ROTFLMAO and move on.
You know I really don't enjoy being condescending and I try to avoid it at all costs, but I'm not sure what else to do when you type outrageous stuff like "MacPhail is a real brain surgeon" and "Bedard's value is definitely lower because we waited" and "MacPhail should have set the market by, ummm, pulling the trigger" and then you refuse to support or re-couch your statements when called on them.
There is nothing wrong with this statement at all, because it is clear you're just offering your opinion which is exactly why we're here. If your previous statements had been offered in such a way, I wouldn't have even bothered responding.
I'm happy with that trade. I just don't want MacPhail to make that trade now if he thinks it will get better. I want him to milk every ounce out of that cow that he can get. If he is waiting, he must think he can and will do better. If he ends up settling for worse, I won't be happy. However, I think I'll wait for this process to play out first. Call me crazy.....
OriolesHangout.com is an unofficial site and not associated with the Baltimore Orioles and part of Hangout Ventures LLC. Copyright ©2011 | Privacy Policy | Advertise with us
Bookmarks