+ Reply to Thread
Results 376 to 390 of 821
Thread: Report: Angelos nixed Deal
-
01-29-2008 12:53 AM #376
It all depends on how desperate the M's are for Bedard. After all Bavasi has said and done, the M's are going to look pretty foolish if they don't get Bedard now. Ian Snell will not get them to the playoffs and Santana doesn't want to play on the West Coast. All their eggs are in Bedard's basket.
My guess is that is what the Orioles are banking on and this is just another ploy to get them to up the ante. MacPhail has pulled the rug out from under Bavasi before, so why be surprised if he did it again? This is an extremely risky gamble by the Orioles, but it might just pay off...Last edited by JTrea81; 01-29-2008 at 12:55 AM.
-
01-29-2008 12:54 AM #377
All-Star
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 2,210
Can someone please explain to me how Jones' words ALONE could bring a deal down?...or at least, why Jones' statement would anger Angelos? Jones has only been a rumored part of the deal for a couple of months. It makes no sense.
On a slightly different note, is it possible that Bavasi is pulling Jones and tellng him to pack for BMore to make it look like a deal has been done in order to put pressure on AM (who will look weak if all this happens and a deal doesn't go through)? If that's the case, that would be kind of underhanded on Bavasi's part.
-
01-29-2008 12:55 AM #378
-
01-29-2008 12:56 AM #379
Ever notice how often those stories are incorrect? Just in this latest Bedard soap opera, countless stories based on anonymous info have later been revised and/or contradicted.
Sometimes sources don't always know as much as they think they know. And by remaining anonymous, they can sprinkle in their opinion with their supposed knowledge without accountability.
-
01-29-2008 12:56 AM #380
-
01-29-2008 12:56 AM #381
Aberdeen
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 141
-
01-29-2008 12:57 AM #382
-
01-29-2008 12:57 AM #383
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- nj
- Posts
- 501
Who exactly do you think would have sympathy for the M's that counts?[/QUOTE]
In the old days we called that credibility-----now "street cred" or something newer that I am not aware of.
Used to be important stuff and based on the most recent BRob and the current Bedard stuff ---I am embarrased for the O's. Used to be you could take one's word to the bank..... not snark out something extra-----or try to.Last edited by weemnj; 01-29-2008 at 12:58 AM. Reason: sp
-
01-29-2008 12:57 AM #384
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 1,428
I don't think I've made repeated attacks on insiders. I think I'm skeptical of information that doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense to me. If it was coming from a mechanic concerning my car I'd be inclined to take them at thier word. As it is, its coming from sources with a mixed- at best- track record.
Angelos has been a horrible owner, no doubt. I'm just not ready to throw him under the bus on this particular issue because we don't have any kind of legitimate information saying PGA nixed this deal after initially agreeing to it.
-
01-29-2008 12:57 AM #385
Aberdeen
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Washington DC/Baltimore
- Posts
- 117
just so I dont have to read through every page of this thread, where is this info coming from other than Peace's post?
I am not in anyway saying that its not true as I have not talked to a source at all since earlier
-
01-29-2008 12:57 AM #386
-
01-29-2008 12:59 AM #387
-
01-29-2008 12:59 AM #388
Plus Member Since 02/03
Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 15,370
-
01-29-2008 01:00 AM #389
-
01-29-2008 01:01 AM #390
After all that has been rumored though and Bavasi's matter-of-factly stating his final offer was on the table, he would look foolish to overpay for Bedard. Especially when it is a one horse race. The entire baseball world knows how this trade has been jerked around. Like Peace said, he would garner sympathy if the deal went sour and could take out the "we did everything we could" card.
He would be incredibly stupid to bid against himself at this point.



Reply With Quote


Bookmarks