+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 94
02-09-2009 05:20 PM #1GCL O's
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
Wiggy on hold, Are we in on Manny
If Wiggy is not signed would we be interested in Manny? Manny would be the bat we need to have some protection for our younger hitters. Would we be willing to take that chance?
02-09-2009 05:21 PM #2
This is going to get ugly. But I really want ManRam.
02-09-2009 05:21 PM #3
No...No...No...No...NO! Manny Rameriez would kill any clubhouse improvement we try to make we ditched Tejada and Hernandez do we need another who is worse than both of them combined?
02-09-2009 05:22 PM #4
I would love to get Manny.
02-09-2009 05:22 PM #5
We DON'T NEED MANNY
02-09-2009 05:23 PM #6
No, but I think that if something happens to Donnie Murphy in spring training we may be interested in acquiring Chase Utley.
02-09-2009 05:24 PM #7
Why does anyone think Wiggy's on hold? Didn't Roch say he was going to complete his physical later this week and get announced at that time?
How does that lead anyone to think that we're in on Manny?
02-09-2009 05:24 PM #8
02-09-2009 05:25 PM #9
Ok, I've been off the board for a few days. What did I miss? I thought Wiggington was a done deal?
02-09-2009 05:25 PM #10
02-09-2009 05:26 PM #11
Can Manny play multiple positions with an average glove? And on top of that, take a deal similar to Wiggington?
02-09-2009 05:26 PM #12
I think Manny really needs to be on a contender. When you're winning, Manny can be Manny, and it's funny. But on a losing team, no one would be laughing.
Also, he's reportedly already turned down 1/25 and 2/45 from the Dodgers. The O's have no business offering him that kind of money.
02-09-2009 05:26 PM #13
02-09-2009 05:27 PM #14
This is really not worthy of discussion. There is as much chance of Manny becoming an Oriole as there is Barry Bonds.
02-09-2009 05:29 PM #15