Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Moose Milligan

2018 Orioles...if you could add one Oriole HoFer...

Recommended Posts

I think we do this every year.  If you could add one Oriole Hall of Famer to this years team...who would you pick?

Cal Ripken - 3B/SS

Frank Robinson - RF

Brooks Robinson - 3B

Eddie Murray - 1B

Jim Palmer- SP

Earl Weaver - Manager

 

I think for me, the obvious choice would be an in his prime Jim Palmer.  That was my gut reaction.  But after seeing how terrible Chris Davis has been, I think anyone who says Eddie Murray could feel justified.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

It's always about the pitching.   Palmer was the best we've ever had and I would choose him from this list.

I'd go with Palmer, like I said.

However, I'd be worried about how his stuff would translate to todays game.  So much emphasis is placed on k/9 rate and he peaked at 6.0 during his prime.  He always had a really good defense behind him and this years defense would be classified as average at best.

The Murray option becomes more intriguing to me because you'd have a gold glove switch hitting first baseman that has some OBP skills and some power.  I think that would be a big boost to our offense and defense.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread could be misconstrued to mean someone that's in the Orioles hall of fame. But since I'm pretty sure you mean the big Hall of Fame. I'll say Jim Palmer.

Otherwise I'd have said Mike Mussina. Considering how many of his contemporaries had trouble pitching in Camden Yards as an Oriole. With the likes of David Wells, Kevin Brown, and Sid Fernandez.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I think we do this every year.  If you could add one Oriole Hall of Famer to this years team...who would you pick?

Cal Ripken - 3B/SS

Frank Robinson - RF

Brooks Robinson - 3B

Eddie Murray - 1B

Jim Palmer- SP

Earl Weaver - Manager

 

I think for me, the obvious choice would be an in his prime Jim Palmer.  That was my gut reaction.  But after seeing how terrible Chris Davis has been, I think anyone who says Eddie Murray could feel justified.  

Just because Murray is on the team doesn't mean Davis will get benched.  Davis at first Murray to DH. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Just because Murray is on the team doesn't mean Davis will get benched.  Davis at first Murray to DH. 

Murray in his prime was a much better fielder than Davis is now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, clapdiddy said:

Murray in his prime was a much better fielder than Davis is now.

What does that have to do with anything?

Davis still has that contract.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

What does that have to do with anything?

Davis still has that contract.

I'm just saying that you could put Davis at DH and Murray at 1B.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, clapdiddy said:

I'm just saying that you could put Davis at DH and Murray at 1B.   

Sure you could.  Early enough in Murray's career I would.

Doesn't mean that is what would actually happen.

Now if the OP had said we could replace any one player with an Oriole Hall of Famer, it would be a more interesting topic.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sure you could.  Early enough in Murray's career I would.

Doesn't mean that is what would actually happen.

Now if the OP had said we could replace any one player with an Oriole Hall of Famer, it would be a more interesting topic.

Agreed.  Murray for Davis would be a no-brainer.   Especially at his 29 year-old salary of around 1.5 M.  :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I'd go with Palmer, like I said.

However, I'd be worried about how his stuff would translate to todays game.  So much emphasis is placed on k/9 rate and he peaked at 6.0 during his prime.  He always had a really good defense behind him and this years defense would be classified as average at best.

The Murray option becomes more intriguing to me because you'd have a gold glove switch hitting first baseman that has some OBP skills and some power.  I think that would be a big boost to our offense and defense.  

Palmer's high fastball might have made him more like the aforementioned Sid Fernandez at Camden Yards now that I think about it more. Interesting to think about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Undersold on this board is the fact that Toronto is a VERY large market with VERY rich ownership. At least that's my recollection. We're really going against 3 financial juggernauts and the most efficient franchise in the sport. Tough division.
    • And I don't get the idea that he's so easy to replace. I've seen this team run out enough stiffs in the outfield since Markakis left to not take that position for granted.
    • The international guys are most interesting to me. In theory one or two could come stateside and be top 10 prospects quickly if the hype matches the eye test. The few guys I wouldn't be surprised to also see added are: Cumberland - could be our future backup catcher, which has value. Could see him in the 20-30 range at the end of of 2021 with a good year. Mattson - another arm from the Bundy deal. We haven't seen him much yet. Wouldn't surprise me if he turns out to have Zimmermann like production. The headliner in a Cobb/Santander/Mancini trade.
    • 6/150 to a 31 year old centerfielder.  I hope the Jays choke on it.
    • I just don’t get the idea of why you think he is so hard to replace unless you think he is going to be healthy and a lot better moving forward than he has been so far in his career.
    • I think his ceiling would be that of a guy who is, as you say, a fringe core player. So, I would agree that he has an outside chance of becoming that player.  However, he is most likely “just” a solid role player capable of carrying an offense for a week or so.  While he is making little to no money (basically for the next 2 seasons), that is quite valuable.  No denying that. But there is risk there and you can replace him within the organization and since you don’t care about winning, just do that.
    • He's an interesting guys as well, just didn't know much about his control/command or the mechanics so it would e tough for him to jump on the scene unless he show up in the GCL and is pitching lights out with great stuff. then again, he's probably in the same class as Ortiz overall, just a lot of unknowns.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...