Jump to content
weams

Rich Dubroff: Joe Angel not returning.

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

The problem with Bordick is he is always positive.  Palmer tells it like it is and the is refreshing.  I can understand why Bordick stays positive, Palmer has the gravitas to criticize the Orioles.  It's not the same for everyone else. 

Bordick is a very smart baseball man who unfortunately it appears has gone to the Jim Hunter school of rainbows and unicorns school of broadcasting. His usage of baseball cliches continually, including some that it appears he made up himself (steaks for RBIs), drives me up a wall. Also his penchent for reading the stats put on the screen for a new pitcher or when talking about a prospects is insufferable. Give us analysis of the numbers, not read them off. 



 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

Bordick is a very smart baseball man who unfortunately it appears has gone to the Jim Hunter school of rainbows and unicorns school of broadcasting. His usage of baseball cliches continually, including some that it appears he made up himself (steaks for RBIs), drives me up a wall. Also his penchent for reading the stats put on the screen for a new pitcher or when talking about a prospects is insufferable. Give us analysis of the numbers, not read them off. 



 

Mike "Center Cut" Bordick! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Philip said:

I disagree strongly, but I appreciate your thoughts. I enjoy a good poetry chat, but my point was that Bordick fails at the basic skill of sounding like he is in any way involved in the game, and when he tries, the attempts fail worse than not trying at all.

We can agree on that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did anyone consider that at 71-years old Joe doesn't want to follow up a 47-win season with another rebuilding year that is looking at another 100+ loss season?

i wouldn't blame him one bit to not want a travel this much at this stage in his career to cover a team at this stage of the rebuild.

I hope the Orioles bring someone new to be play by play and maybe pair him with Ben McDonald as much as possible.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

Did anyone consider that at 71-years old Joe doesn't want to follow up a 47-win season with another rebuilding year that is looking at another 100+ loss season?

i wouldn't blame him one bit to not want a travel this much at this stage in his career to cover a team at this stage of the rebuild.

I hope the Orioles bring someone new to be play by play and maybe pair him with Ben McDonald as much as possible.

100%.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Did anyone consider that at 71-years old Joe doesn't want to follow up a 47-win season with another rebuilding year that is looking at another 100+ loss season?

i wouldn't blame him one bit to not want a travel this much at this stage in his career to cover a team at this stage of the rebuild.

I hope the Orioles bring someone new to be play by play and maybe pair him with Ben McDonald as much as possible.

Safe bet.  It's hard enough to watch this team voluntarily, can't imagine being forced to talk about it (even though I am sure it pays pretty well).

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Philip said:

I agree completely, I like it very much, but it’s not a good poem. For instance consider the very first syllable, “oh” he could’ve used almost any other single syllable word in that language and it would’ve been superior. Read the first line out loud and replace “oh” with “and” “for” “now” or another word And you’ll see how much better it works. The word, “oh” means nothing.

 

 

I always thought oh was an exclamation. Should have been Oh! I have slipped... :noidea:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I think Hunter could actually be good if he stopped being a member of the lollipop guild.

Nah. Even if, he still just quotes stats, endlessly. He IS batting .289 on Tuesday nights in domed stadiums.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

His usage of baseball cliches continually, including some that it appears he made up himself (steaks for RBIs), drives me up a wall.

I actually used to work with a college baseball coach about 10-15 years ago that called RBIs steaks too. But he and Bordick are the only people that I’ve ever heard that use that term. I hated it then and I hate it now. Haha. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Bordick is a very smart baseball man who unfortunately it appears has gone to the Jim Hunter school of rainbows and unicorns school of broadcasting. His usage of baseball cliches continually, including some that it appears he made up himself (steaks for RBIs), drives me up a wall. Also his penchent for reading the stats put on the screen for a new pitcher or when talking about a prospects is insufferable. Give us analysis of the numbers, not read them off. 



 

His job is not nearly as secure as Palmer's... 😛

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Did anyone consider that at 71-years old Joe doesn't want to follow up a 47-win season with another rebuilding year that is looking at another 100+ loss season?

i wouldn't blame him one bit to not want a travel this much at this stage in his career to cover a team at this stage of the rebuild.

I hope the Orioles bring someone new to be play by play and maybe pair him with Ben McDonald as much as possible.

I thought of that. If he was already pondering retirement the dismal season ahead could have been the straw that broke the camel's back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, interloper said:

Imagine having to listen to Hunter pretend he knows about analytics every day AND travel with the guy. 

I would give just about any bit of money to lock you in a room with Dempsey and Hunter for an hour with a baseball game on TV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I would give just about any bit of money to lock you in a room with Dempsey and Hunter for an hour with a baseball game on TV.

Better be a stout door to that room if you put me in there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Where I used to post, there was a poster who used to strongly argue against rebuilding.  I disagree with many of aspects of his plan and how he thought the Os should go about things however, the one thing he was dead on about is that rebuilding doesn’t bring you anything unique outside of the (hopefully) #1 pick and more draft allotment money. Outside of that, rebuilding doesn’t provide you anything that you can’t do already.  For example, the Dodgers continue to spend internationally, draft and develop well, play their young guys every year, etc...They draft near the end of every round every year and it hasn’t mattered.  Those are all of the things people will point to that you should do with a rebuild yet none of them are exclusive to whether you win 60 games lose 60 games. And btw, let’s remember that a lot of our better prospects were here before Elias. I was perfectly fine with them tanking early on for the high picks...but I’m not ok with it now.  What we saw at the end of last year is what I was hoping for in 2020..a lot of young talent making it’s way up here and getting that experience.  We should see a lot more of that in 2021. However, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t also make trades, spend wisely in FA, etc..There is no reason for this team to field a team that would be lucky to win 70 games in 2021.  I’m not saying they need a 150M payroll in 2021 but they should be fielding a team very capable of being a 500 team provided that the young guys perform.  2022 should be the year this team is contending. The Orioles (and every other team) will never be good if their young talent doesn’t develop.  That’s just reality.  Those guys need to be able to play and I would agree that you don’t block those players from playing.  But the Os have room in several areas of the team to add higher quality talent and they are hiding behind the rebuilding idea to not do it.  And the idea that many of you fans are ok with that is sad to me.  You expect so little from this team right now and that is all they have given you for the last 3 years.  They have saved a ton of money and yet you buy into the “we are poor” mantra.  I just don’t get that.    The Os are one of the few teams in the league right now that can use their payroll as an advantage.  Take on a bad contract for a top prospect.  Sign a FA that normally wouldn’t come here.  Trade for a guy on a higher but reasonable contract.  Things like that but they aren’t even considering those things and the fan base is content with that.  I don’t get it.  
    • Some interesting observations: Team names on jerseys are in English None of their shirts have armpits Team name "Dinos" evokes an image of a stubby-armed T.Rex trying to deal with a fastball, low and away
    • Is that him standing back off to the left? A bit tough to tell with the masks.   
    • I don’t see him in the photo. I guess he’s off to one of the sides. 
    • Woah woah woah there. Just wanted clarification.    
    • I disagree strongly that the O’s should be spending much more money on payroll during the rebuild.     I’m happy with the approach Elias is taking.    
    • I guess you have to characterize what represents an "opportunity" I would suggest that it is possible to reach a point where divesting yourself of existing talent in exchange for restocking future talent makes sense. Our farm system was a virtual desert. Largely because we leveraged the future for the now a few times too many. Whether you agree with the approach or not, a rebuild cycle is a pretty common strategy in pro sports.  Sell off today... accumulate and develop young talent, and then begin adding strategic pieces as your young talent matures. Spending a boatload of FA money now... without the bolus of young talent to build around would be contrary to the aims of that approach. And it would make less of that money available when you actually want it. You don't have to agree with the approach.. but I think it's a little disingenuous to suggest that people who are in agreement with the approach are gullible rubes who "buy into" a deception. Or that the people executing the strategy are acting in bad faith. Why not just say "I think it's a bad strategy"? What attack it's proponents? I don't get it.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...