Jump to content
Tony-OH

#21 Terps at Temple

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

Kick the FG in the first half, then you only have to play for another FG at Temple 12 with 2 mins to go.    Instead, incomplete at 12 and turn the ball over on downs. 

Great point. I didn't even address how poor a decision that was by Locksley. That fake FG was ridiculous and showed how cocky Locksley was. This game was hopefully a wake up call for him but it also may highlight why Locksley had been such an awful head coach in the past.

Great recruiter, and probably a great O-coord, but he may be over his head as a head coach. He failed his players and program today and gets a grade F- for his in-game decisions.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I kept waiting for some play action or draw plays. That's football 101 when dealing with over zealous LB's and DE's. Make them think you're passing when you're running and running when you're passing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see a win against Rutgers and a close loss against Indiana at home.  Other than that I see a lot of boat race losses.  The inability to develop guys to win in the trenches and failure to develop a QB continues to doom this program.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, OsEatAlEast said:

I kept waiting for some play action or draw plays. That's football 101 when dealing with over zealous LB's and DE's. Make them think you're passing when you're running and running when you're passing.

I'm searching my brain to see  if I can remember worse red zone play calling. So far I have not been able to call up with worse. 

I will say I'm not real happy to read Locksley's comments after the game. He didn't take any responsibility at all and that's unfortunate. Makes me concerned.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see Temple as I follow Navy, they aren't a bad football team.  I think they've been to bowl games the past five years.  Their coach got a head gig at Georgia Tech and they walloped us last year.  I'm not saying this loss didn't hurt, but I don't think it was as horrendous as you make it sound.  My hope is this serves as a wake-up call to the guys and that this happening early in the season will help.  Those two wins may have gotten to everybody's heads a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/16/2019 at 1:19 PM, jarman86 said:

I see Temple as I follow Navy, they aren't a bad football team.  I think they've been to bowl games the past five years.  Their coach got a head gig at Georgia Tech and they walloped us last year.  I'm not saying this loss didn't hurt, but I don't think it was as horrendous as you make it sound.  My hope is this serves as a wake-up call to the guys and that this happening early in the season will help.  Those two wins may have gotten to everybody's heads a bit.

I don't think this was a case of players and coaches overlooking Temple or letting the big wins get to their head, this was a case of a QB who struggled under the first pressure he saw and awful play calling, particularly in the red zone. 

The fact that Temple tried to give them the game twice and the awful play calling kept trying to stuff it up the middle, when they have Piggy, McFarland and Leake. Are you telling me that anyone here thinks if they had spread out the defense, put Piggy in shotgun with McFarland and Leake that they don't think they could get a yard with a option play?

My biggest concern is that the game calling is always going to be this unimaginative and awful in the red zone when the line is going to be dominated. Good coordinators understand their weakness and strengths and play to their strengths in personnel and don't try the cookie cutter old school approach.

I'm also concerns that Jackson will continue to struggle when he pressured. He's not very mobile back there and once he was under pressure his decision making and accuracy dropped off significantly. That's a yellow flag for me.

This game was a giant let down because they had an opportunity to go under a Nationally televised game ranked against Penn State but instead, looked like the same old Terp football program that shrinks as soon as it as a chance to shine.

I also have concerns that Locksley did not over rule the play calls and also went for that awful two-point conversion. Had they gone for field goal and made it, the Terps could have gone ahead with a field goal instead of being stuffed twice on the goal line in the 4th QTR.

It was one game, and people can improve and learn, but what I saw was a coaching staff and quarterback that appeared to be over their heads in their first real test of adversity. 

Now if they can come out and play a good close game against Penn State it might heal some things, but only a win would erase this debacle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

I always enjoy your analysis Tony. You're always on the mark and I consider you the Bible when it comes to this stuff with your background in scouting. That said, I was distressed to see Maryland bring back a second rate coach in Locksley. It was like reliving a nightmare of past seasons when he was on this staff. I don't know who to blame here other than the administration who keeps rolling in these guys and expect to realistically compete in the Big 10. Perhaps some day before they shovel gravel on me I'll see a real football coach here who can at least develop a legitimate quarterback.

Well thanks, but I'm just a fan when it comes to to football vs a scout.

I'm not ready to jump off the Locksley train yet, but I do have some concerns after the way they lost and his lack of leadership and questionable in game decisions. 

Let's see if they recover against Penn State and watch how decisions are made in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎9‎/‎18‎/‎2019 at 10:11 AM, Tony-OH said:

I don't think this was a case of players and coaches overlooking Temple or letting the big wins get to their head, this was a case of a QB who struggled under the first pressure he saw and awful play calling, particularly in the red zone. 

The fact that Temple tried to give them the game twice and the awful play calling kept trying to stuff it up the middle, when they have Piggy, McFarland and Leake. Are you telling me that anyone here thinks if they had spread out the defense, put Piggy in shotgun with McFarland and Leake that they don't think they could get a yard with a option play?

My biggest concern is that the game calling is always going to be this unimaginative and awful in the red zone when the line is going to be dominated. Good coordinators understand their weakness and strengths and play to their strengths in personnel and don't try the cookie cutter old school approach.

I'm also concerns that Jackson will continue to struggle when he pressured. He's not very mobile back there and once he was under pressure his decision making and accuracy dropped off significantly. That's a yellow flag for me.

This game was a giant let down because they had an opportunity to go under a Nationally televised game ranked against Penn State but instead, looked like the same old Terp football program that shrinks as soon as it as a chance to shine.

I also have concerns that Locksley did not over rule the play calls and also went for that awful two-point conversion. Had they gone for field goal and made it, the Terps could have gone ahead with a field goal instead of being stuffed twice on the goal line in the 4th QTR.

It was one game, and people can improve and learn, but what I saw was a coaching staff and quarterback that appeared to be over their heads in their first real test of adversity. 

Now if they can come out and play a good close game against Penn State it might heal some things, but only a win would erase this debacle.

Fair, I've only seen 3 games on Jackson, as I can't tell you since the Terps left ACC the last time I watched VT play, so I have that small sample size to go off of.  As you said, I saw a potential "real" QB in first 2 games.  This third one does give me caution, but I'm not off anyone's train yet either, which is why I'm giving that one up to benefit of the doubt.  New coaches, new players.  Maybe Locksley let the O-coord keep the reigns because he viewed it as a game to prove himself before the big competition and will be quicker to take them back when we play the big boys, I don't know.  My point was more that Temple is not a cupcake team that they were going to waltz all over either, and I take that into my factor as well.  They turn out NFL defensive players fairly regularly and have a pretty consistent record of being a good team, we do not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • The rebuttal to the injury argument is that he remains the Orioles most valuable player and one of their two most trade able assets. And it’s doubtful that the difference will have a significant impact on the trade return.
    • Andrews was targeted 11 times and only caught 4.  I remember at least 1 drop that was in between his numbers. Dobbins dropped at least 2 that were in between his numbers.  Including one that would have saved another airmailed snap.
    • Fair enough.    There have been many times we heard over the winter that a late season injury was nothing serious, only to find out the following March or April that the player needs surgery.   I’ll certainly be holding my breath.
    • We might get lucky with Brown, Jr.  I'd love to see him stay, but I don't think they franchise him and they might just not be able to do it, especially if they extend Lamar.  Which is part of the reason I think we shouldn't extend Lamar this year.  I think it's a foregone conclusion they will, but he still has 2 years, let him earn another year of his rookie deal that allows us some flexibility with supporting cast members.  Zeus Jr might be able to get done then.  But I think Lamar getting an extension is almost certain.
    • I was talking to a friend during the game and commented, "It's like they know what's coming... Just like the Chargers a couple years ago."  Playing your old team in the Playoffs has to be scary.  But I do feel like we run what Tyrod Taylor was running up there with Roman.  We might do it a little better , but... when the passing side of the OFF is utterly useless, you aren't going to win many games against similarly good teams.  And when you don't change up, predictability is a killer. I just hope that with the coming commitment to Lamar the FO does something equally as big and gets someone who can develop him and this offense into something really special.  Roman is a running game savant, I think we have to give him that.  But there needs to be someone to help him to integrate a real passing scheme - whether that's an outstanding QB coach and outstanding WR's coach to join him or us moving on to a more complete OC, something has to give if Lamar gets signed for the next 6-12 years. I asked earlier who a new OC might be.  I have no clue, honestly.  I just know we are gonna be a hard luck story for many years to come if we don't at least begin to put a competent passing game into place and then all the money they are going to spend on Lamar will be for naught.  Commit to him, we have to commit to a system that is a complete game.
    • MacDonald officially gone to Michigan. Culley is gone to Jackonsville.
    • Lamar didn’t have much time to throw yesterday but Roman never adjusted.  Screens, quick throws, etc...none of that is in our offense.     Roman has got to go.  As much as I think Lamar holds us back, Roman may hold us back more.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...