Jump to content
wildcard

O's Dilemma with Villar

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Hallas said:

Chris Davis had 2 fantastic years and 1 pretty good year, so I'm not sure he belongs in the discussion of one-season wonders. 

I didn’t intend to suggest Davis was a one-year wonder, but he got his massive contract after his career year, When it was unlikely that he would repeat it, And he had so many other problems. Villar is much more versatile, but speed is his best asset.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Philip said:

Ummmmyesitis.

Basically the main ways we can acquire talent in the next 2-3 years is via the draft and selling high on players. So we want the best draft position possible. 

To me, Villar is a slam dunk trade. It should really get people thinking that we should trade Bundy and Givens. Given that less teams are chasing the wild card in July, and that Givens and Bundy wouldn’t be considered elite difference makers, we’d have more of a market to trade them now.  Bundy can be a back of rotation type for two full seasons. Givens is a MR/SU guy that a team shouldn’t let face too many LH hitters. Trade them now instead of facing a niche market of 1-2 teams in July. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, connja said:

2nd base seems to are the only position they haven't tried out Mountcastle, which surprises me a bit since the word is that it's his arm that doesn't play at 3rd and SS.  Why haven't they tried him at 2nd, which would help to ease the corner OF/1B/DH log jam.

I don't have any insight into the Orioles' decisions and processes, but Mountcastle is 6' 3".  Here's a complete list of all players 6' 3" or taller who've played 500+ games at second in major league history: Ben Zobrist, DJ LeMahieu, Neil Walker, Mike Andrews, Don Kolloway.

Maybe this is a unfounded prejudice based on old information.  Probably it's because second basemen are selected in part for their quickness, agility and footwork around the bag while turning the double play.  Most players 6' 3" or taller aren't know for their ballerina-like moves.  

I'd at least entertain the idea that with the newer rules against takeout slides maybe teams would rethink the prioritization of agility in a second baseman.  But I still doubt the Orioles want to experiment with maybe their best hitting prospect getting his legs swept at a position he has never played as a pro.

(Edit: RC Gonzales and Ryan Flaherty are both 6' 3", so it looks like having a very tall second baseman could be key to having an out-of-nowhere Cinderella season in Baltimore)

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mountcastle, Mancini, and Nunez should all be splitting time between 1B and DH next year.  Trumbo is gone, Davis needs to go.  They need break the logjam of 1B/DH types.  Honestly, I'd be happy if they can find a trade partner for Nunez coming off his 30HR season.  Then you can let Mancini and Mountcastle play everyday between 1B and DH.  Or alternatively, trade Mancini if the value is there, let Nunez DH, and put Mountcastle at 1B every day.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Basically the main ways we can acquire talent in the next 2-3 years is via the draft and selling high on players. So we want the best draft position possible. 

To me, Villar is a slam dunk trade. It should really get people thinking that we should trade Bundy and Givens. Given that less teams are chasing the wild card in July, and that Givens and Bundy wouldn’t be considered elite difference makers, we’d have more of a market to trade them now.  Bundy can be a back of rotation type for two full seasons. Givens is a MR/SU guy that a team shouldn’t let face too many LH hitters. Trade them now instead of facing a niche market of 1-2 teams in July. 

I agree that trading Villar is a good idea if possible, but I doubt he will bring back enough of a return to make a trade worthwhile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I don't have any insight into the Orioles' decisions and processes, but Mountcastle is 6' 3".  Here's a complete list of all players 6' 3" or taller who've played 500+ games at second in major league history: Ben Zobrist, DJ LeMahieu, Neil Walker, Mike Andrews, Don Kolloway.

Maybe this is a unfounded prejudice based on old information.  Probably it's because second basemen are selected in part for their quickness, agility and footwork around the bag while turning the double play.  Most players 6' 3" or taller aren't know for their ballerina-like moves.  

I'd at least entertain the idea that with the newer rules against takeout slides maybe teams would rethink the prioritization of agility in a second baseman.  But I still doubt the Orioles want to experiment with maybe their best hitting prospect getting his legs swept at a position he has never played as a pro.

(Edit: RC Gonzales and Ryan Flaherty are both 6' 3", so it looks like having a very tall second baseman could be key to having an out-of-nowhere Cinderella season in Baltimore)

Schoop was only 6'2"' but built like a linebacker, and while not exactly balletic nobody turned the DP better IMO.

 

 

 

 

 

 

;"

;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Schoop was only 6'2"' but built like a linebacker, and while not exactly balletic nobody turned the DP better IMO.

 

 

 

 

 

 

;"

;

I don't disagree, but Schoop has a third baseman's arm.  He probably had one of the better second baseman's arms I've seen.  Mountcastle doesn't, and he's never played second.  It just seems unlikely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I don't disagree, but Schoop has a third baseman's arm.  He probably had one of the better second baseman's arms I've seen.  Mountcastle doesn't, and he's never played second.  It just seems unlikely.

Not arguing for Mountcastle just contesting the notion that 2B has to be BRob/Altuve types.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, El Gordo said:

Schoop was only 6'2"' but built like a linebacker, and while not exactly balletic nobody turned the DP better IMO.

 

 

 

 

 

 

;"

;

I agree, and nobody, IMO took throws on steals and made better tags at second. But, I thought he was rather average or below on range, going to his right on bloops. He just seemed nonchalant on plays he may have had some chance at. I don't know a thing about Mountcastle other than what has been written here. I could be wrong, but it seems the biggest complaint was his arm at third. It would be nice if he could handle second, 30 HR's at that position is a plus. I would guess the higher ups have already decided it would not work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I don't disagree, but Schoop has a third baseman's arm.  He probably had one of the better second baseman's arms I've seen.  Mountcastle doesn't, and he's never played second.  It just seems unlikely.

Is there a reason why shorter ballerina like players are preferred at 2B but not at SS?  I can't really see why 2B would require a player to be more athletic than SS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hallas said:

Is there a reason why shorter ballerina like players are preferred at 2B but not at SS?  I can't really see why 2B would require a player to be more athletic than SS.

I assume it's all about the double play pivot, the quick transfer from catch to throwing to a base behind you, and the fact your back is usually to the baserunner while waiting for the throw.  The shortstop almost always has the play in front of him, and is coming across the bag.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, El Gordo said:

Not arguing for Mountcastle just contesting the notion that 2B has to be BRob/Altuve types.

Weird aside, but prior to about 1920 or 1930 third basemen and second basemen were kind of switched.  Second basemen were often bigger guys who were valued more for hitting than glove.  Third basemen were seen as defense-first players whose primary responsibility was to be agile and handle the endless bunts coming their way.  I think Nap Lajoie was built more like Schoop than Altuve (at least for his era).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/2/2019 at 2:57 PM, DrungoHazewood said:

So he should bring in a decent return in a trade. Even if it's just for one year of him at 3rd year arb prices.

I was thinking a player in teams top 5-10 range, a 25-30, and some filler.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That was more of a vague approximation.  But I don't really like the idea of signing a pretty good player into his early-to-mid 30s at free agent rates.  Maybe it's Brian Roberts.

Villar and Roberts are basically the same player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Where I used to post, there was a poster who used to strongly argue against rebuilding.  I disagree with many of aspects of his plan and how he thought the Os should go about things however, the one thing he was dead on about is that rebuilding doesn’t bring you anything unique outside of the (hopefully) #1 pick and more draft allotment money. Outside of that, rebuilding doesn’t provide you anything that you can’t do already.  For example, the Dodgers continue to spend internationally, draft and develop well, play their young guys every year, etc...They draft near the end of every round every year and it hasn’t mattered.  Those are all of the things people will point to that you should do with a rebuild yet none of them are exclusive to whether you win 60 games lose 60 games. And btw, let’s remember that a lot of our better prospects were here before Elias. I was perfectly fine with them tanking early on for the high picks...but I’m not ok with it now.  What we saw at the end of last year is what I was hoping for in 2020..a lot of young talent making it’s way up here and getting that experience.  We should see a lot more of that in 2021. However, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t also make trades, spend wisely in FA, etc..There is no reason for this team to field a team that would be lucky to win 70 games in 2021.  I’m not saying they need a 150M payroll in 2021 but they should be fielding a team very capable of being a 500 team provided that the young guys perform.  2022 should be the year this team is contending. The Orioles (and every other team) will never be good if their young talent doesn’t develop.  That’s just reality.  Those guys need to be able to play and I would agree that you don’t block those players from playing.  But the Os have room in several areas of the team to add higher quality talent and they are hiding behind the rebuilding idea to not do it.  And the idea that many of you fans are ok with that is sad to me.  You expect so little from this team right now and that is all they have given you for the last 3 years.  They have saved a ton of money and yet you buy into the “we are poor” mantra.  I just don’t get that.    The Os are one of the few teams in the league right now that can use their payroll as an advantage.  Take on a bad contract for a top prospect.  Sign a FA that normally wouldn’t come here.  Trade for a guy on a higher but reasonable contract.  Things like that but they aren’t even considering those things and the fan base is content with that.  I don’t get it.  
    • Some interesting observations: Team names on jerseys are in English None of their shirts have armpits Team name "Dinos" evokes an image of a stubby-armed T.Rex trying to deal with a fastball, low and away
    • Is that him standing back off to the left? A bit tough to tell with the masks.   
    • I don’t see him in the photo. I guess he’s off to one of the sides. 
    • Woah woah woah there. Just wanted clarification.    
    • I disagree strongly that the O’s should be spending much more money on payroll during the rebuild.     I’m happy with the approach Elias is taking.    
    • I guess you have to characterize what represents an "opportunity" I would suggest that it is possible to reach a point where divesting yourself of existing talent in exchange for restocking future talent makes sense. Our farm system was a virtual desert. Largely because we leveraged the future for the now a few times too many. Whether you agree with the approach or not, a rebuild cycle is a pretty common strategy in pro sports.  Sell off today... accumulate and develop young talent, and then begin adding strategic pieces as your young talent matures. Spending a boatload of FA money now... without the bolus of young talent to build around would be contrary to the aims of that approach. And it would make less of that money available when you actually want it. You don't have to agree with the approach.. but I think it's a little disingenuous to suggest that people who are in agreement with the approach are gullible rubes who "buy into" a deception. Or that the people executing the strategy are acting in bad faith. Why not just say "I think it's a bad strategy"? What attack it's proponents? I don't get it.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...