Jump to content
LTO's

Adley Rutschman Gets Major League Camp Invite

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, scOtt said:

Not because they're rebuilding. It because he's not ready for the bigs yet. I agree with those who think 2020 is out of the question. He'll be up in 21 sometime.

He's also got to get to minor league camp to get to know all those guys too. He knows some of them, played 3 levels last year. He has some good young pitchers to learn down there.

A little different situation, as he was a HS draftee and had more spent time in the minors,  but Joe Mauer made the Twins roster in 2004 at age 21.  And OPS'd 939 before injuries sidelined him for the year.

Posey was a September call up the year after he was drafted, but hit horribly (OPS 235 in 17 PAs) at age 22

Brian McCann also had a decent year at age 21, OPS 754 in 59 GP for the Braves in 2005

Edited by GuidoSarducci

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Go for it, I've got a fireplace.

Not like I was wrong about him when folks were talking him up after a hot spring.

Not many people like being right more than you.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, GuidoSarducci said:

A little different situation, as he was a HS draftee and had more spent time in the minors,  but Joe Mauer made the Twins roster in 2004 at age 21.  And OPS'd 939 before injuries sidelined him for the year.

Posey was a September call up the year after he was drafted, but hit horribly (OPS 235 in 17 PAs) at age 22

Brian McCann also had a decent year at age 21, OPS 754 in 59 GP for the Braves in 2005

I've posted this before:

Wieters- Drafted 2007 made MLB debut in 2009.

Posey- Drafted 2008 made MLB debut in 2009.

Sanchez- Drafted 2009 made MLB debut in 2013.

Zunino- Drafted 2012 made MLB debut in 2013.

Schwarber- Drafted 2014 made MLB debut in 2015.

Bart- Drafted 2018 was in AA in 2019.

 

All college catchers taken in the top 5.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Moose Milligan said:

Not many people like being right more than you.

You are correct.

It is the joy of not going for the easy right.  (I'll admit DSjr counted as an easy right but folks still disagreed)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

You are correct.

It is the joy of not going for the easy right.  (I'll admit DSjr counted as an easy right but folks still disagreed)

I think you confused the joy that people got in seeing a guy like that play over his head for a few months...and the possibility that he COULD be turning a corner...with the idea that people thought he was really that good.  

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You are correct.

It is the joy of not going for the easy right.  (I'll admit DSjr counted as an easy right but folks still disagreed)

Off topic but - considering how a guy like Smith ended up tanking back to his true level (albeit the injuries didn't help), do we expect Alberto to totally suck this year? I just can't imagine he hits that well all year a second time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

I think people who expect him up in 2021 and are okay with what has happened this off season are smoking something.

A top prospect is like a top QB draftee.  Good teams dont bring the QB up and hope he brings you to the promise land.  You build a good offensive line and make sure there is a solid foundation in place for success.

Why waste any service time until you have something approximating a ML team.

I look forward to 2027 when I continually see the line "Its great we had Rutschman, it's just too bad we couldnt put something around him."

As for this spring training.  Good. Hes got the skills and needs to see ML quality players.

 

20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Odds are good 2028 Rutschman isn't going to be a difference maker.

I don't see how you can make a case to keep him down for all of 2021 if he's playing at the level we expect. 

Honestly the O's keeping him from a years worth of free agent income by refusing to promote him should result in some punitive action against the team.

Nobody’s talking about keeping Rutschman down for all of 2021, assuming he performs as expected.    We could keep him down a few weeks and he’d still be here in 2027, unless the to-be-negotiated CBA that goes into effect in 2022 says otherwise.  

I think you can carry this advance planning stuff too far.    Nobody really knows when a particular player will peak.    I don’t know how good Rutschman will be in 2028, but I don’t really agree that “odds are” he won’t be a difference maker then.   Yeah, catchers age quickly, but if Rutschman is the hitter he’s expected to be, there’s no reason to think he’ll be done hitting at age 30.    But it’s also true that there’s a learning curve in the majors, and delaying his entry to the majors beyond what’s dictated by his development delays him reaching his peak performance.    Even if the O’s don’t contend in 2021-22, I won’t consider it a “waste” for Rutschman to have played then if it means he’s peaking by 2023.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

Nobody’s talking about keeping Rutschman down for all of 2021, assuming he performs as expected.    We could keep him down a few weeks and he’d still be here in 2027, unless the to-be-negotiated CBA that goes into effect in 2022 says otherwise.  

I think you can carry this advance planning stuff too far.    Nobody really knows when a particular player will peak.    I don’t know how good Rutschman will be in 2028, but I don’t really agree that “odds are” he won’t be a difference maker then.   Yeah, catchers age quickly, but if Rutschman is the hitter he’s expected to be, there’s no reason to think he’ll be done hitting at age 30.    But it’s also true that there’s a learning curve in the majors, and delaying his entry to the majors beyond what’s dictated by his development delays him reaching his peak performance.    Even if the O’s don’t contend in 2021-22, I won’t consider it a “waste” for Rutschman to have played then if it means he’s peaking by 2023.    

I think odds are good almost any player we could name today won't be a "difference maker" in 2028.  (I'm going with clearly above average as my definition for "difference maker".)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think odds are good almost any player we could name today won't be a "difference maker" in 2028.  (I'm going with clearly above average as my definition for "difference maker".)

Well, I suppose the first thing you need to know is did he ever become a difference maker in the first place, and how much of a difference maker was he?   Then you can worry about whether he’ll still be a difference maker in 2028.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, interloper said:

Off topic but - considering how a guy like Smith ended up tanking back to his true level (albeit the injuries didn't help), do we expect Alberto to totally suck this year? I just can't imagine he hits that well all year a second time.

I expect everyone to revert to career average, more or less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Well, I suppose the first thing you need to know is did he ever become a difference maker in the first place, and how much of a difference maker was he?

He isn't even one at this point, which only supports my point of view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

He isn't even one at this point, which only supports my point of view.

Yes, you are at least technically correct.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yes, you are at least technically correct.   

The best kind.

 

But seriously the O's shouldn't be making decisions based on what one player might do in 2028.

And I'm sure they won't be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The best kind.

 

But seriously the O's shouldn't be making decisions based on what one player might do in 2028.

And I'm sure they won't be.

Agreed.     You and I occasionally have disagreed on whether certain players should be held back for service time reasons, but I don’t think we’ve ever disagreed that there’s only so long you can hold a player back when he’s ready for the majors.     

Saying that, while I expect Rutschman to be ready for the majors by next year, he still needs to go out and prove it.    
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Agreed.     You and I occasionally have disagreed on whether certain players should be held back for service time reasons, but I don’t think we’ve ever disagreed that there’s only so long you can hold a player back when he’s ready for the majors.     

Saying that, while I expect Rutschman to be ready for the majors by next year, he still needs to go out and prove it.    
 

Sure, I'm not suggesting his draft status gives him a free pass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • The problem isn’t just missing pitches here and there, as frustrating as that can be for the players and managers. When an ump is having a bad game the batters, pitchers, and catchers have no idea what the strike zone is going to be from inning to inning or even from pitch to pitch. How was Realmuto to know that last pitch was going to be called strike three to end the game when a better pitch to Harper had been called a ball just seconds earlier?    One of the main advantages of an electronic strike zone would be the consistency of that zone. What’s a strike now will be a strike next inning and next game and next year. I think that’s where the primary value will be found. 
    • As if my year couldn’t get any worse, Sisco starts doing good...
    • I've been in the robo ump camp for a while now, and these examples only strengthen my viewpoint.  The time has come to remove ball and strike calls from the umpire.  Make it happen.
    • I am still adjusting to all the new people, in part because I watch over the MLB app and I frenetically switch between the TV, radio, home/away feeds so everyone kinda blurs together (particularly after a few beers). I think Ben is awesome on color. I like Melanie the best so far on play by play. Her even, steady, slow, accurate calls are a classic style. I find her voice pleasing. Sure, she could work on the excitement a bit perhaps, but I think it is better to grow into excitement than to come to the door with it. She will find her signature call. She has the most upside of the lot I think.
    • I don't have a problem with the baseball knowledge or game calling accuracy of anyone on the TV or radio crews this year. I fully understand the difficult circumstances and that they're beholden to what they see on TV. I don't think any of them are dunces about baseball. I'm sure all of them are very nice people, too. The lack of excitement -- especially with Scott Garceau -- is the worst thing for me. Jim Hunter may not have known the sport, but at least he knew how to make a home run call. He was also an excellent setup man for Jim Palmer's often sarcastic retorts. Palmer was so great at underhandedly insulting Hunter for not even "getting it" after Palmer hinted at it and it was so funny. Their dynamic was far more entertaining than Garceau and McDonald.
    • In some areas of private industry, there's a (fairly brutal, honestly) performance management process called "stack ranking." In stack ranking, everyone's performance is compared against each other, using a combination of objective and subjective metrics. The elite few at the top get raises and/or promotions; the solid contributors get to coast along undisturbed; the struggling end up getting "help" to try to improve their performance; and the worst of the worst get fired. This happens on a monthly, bi-annual or yearly cadence depending on the company. Stack ranking of umpires would be based on their accuracy on calls compared to the "correct" call via video review / electronic strike zone. You could set up the strata exactly as you do for tech workers: give raises to the best, let the good ones keep going, pull the struggling ones from daily MLB games and have them work on their calls and improve in some kind of umpiring camp, and just fire the worst ~1% every year. The other thing you could do is add more umpires to the umpiring pool. This would increase the "overhead" cost of umpiring, yes, but by adding more umpires without adding more teams or games, you could set up a situation where only the best X% of umpires get to call MLB games on the regular. The rest would either call simulated games, extended spring training games, or minor league games until they get better.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...