Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
interloper

O's claim Andrew Velazquez, DFA Richard Urena

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Philip said:

Meanwhile, I wonder how many 40th guys are monitoring Orioles camp closely, gauging their chances of getting picked up By Baltimore when their inevitable designation occurs?

If you are a bad baseball player currently on a 40 man roster, odds are you will be on the Orioles at some point this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Not sure I get this one. Urena is younger and has more ML experience (and probably more upside), but Velazquez has more positional flexibility.

The Orioles likes his flexibility of playing CF, plus SS. They think he has a slight defensive edge at SS to Urena. Add in his speed and think of him as a better, more defensively flexible Steve Wilkerson.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

The Orioles likes his flexibility of playing CF, plus SS. They think he has a slight defensive edge at SS to Urena. Add in his speed and think of him as a better, more defensively flexible Steve Wilkerson.

We can still change our answers on the roster quiz right? Until Friday?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just digging into his stats more.... 

In Velazquez’s one full AAA season(Age 23), he put up a .726 OPS. 12 HR, 29 SB. This was pre-juiced ball. The impressive part is that he started 67 games in CF, 31 games at SS, and 14 at 2B. 
 

So he’s more versatile than Urena.  A Switch Hitter, and he has two options remaining.  Urena had 0.  

He also allows us the flexibility of not having to add Mason Williams to be the backup CF. So that saves us from having to DFA someone off the 40 man. It doesn’t force the issue. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, atomic said:

Is it? How many bad infielders do we need?

In the minors, off the 40-man roster? Plenty. He could be the utility infielder at Norfolk or start everyday at Bowie. He turns 24 in two days and is still something of a prospect. Certainly more interesting than Angelo Mora who is three years older and the guy he will be replacing at Norfolk or Bowie. Would rather have a guy with a utility infielder ceiling getting playing time at the upper minors than an Org guy like Mora.

Last year Jesmuel Valentin and Anderson Feliz combined for 142 games last year at Bowie and Feliz, Chris Bostick, Zach Vincej, and Jack Reinheimer combined for 355 games at Norfolk. That is a lot of playing time that could be available for fringe prospects like Urena rather than org guys.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure this was Elias saying he likes Velazquez more than Urena as much as it was him saying he likes the gamble of having both of them with the downside of just Velazquez more than having only Urena.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

In the minors, off the 40-man roster? Plenty. He could be the utility infielder at Norfolk or start everyday at Bowie. He turns 24 in two days and is still something of a prospect. Certainly more interesting than Angelo Mora who is three years older and the guy he will be replacing at Norfolk or Bowie. Would rather have a guy with a utility infielder ceiling getting playing time at the upper minors than an Org guy like Mora.

Last year Jesmuel Valentin and Anderson Feliz combined for 142 games last year at Bowie and Feliz, Chris Bostick, Zach Vincej, and Jack Reinheimer combined for 355 games at Norfolk. That is a lot of playing time that could be available for fringe prospects like Urena rather than org guys.

They have other guys who also passed through waivers.  And guys like Martin who most likely will be in AAA.  You can't keep them all.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, atomic said:

They have other guys who also passed through waivers.  And guys like Martin who most likely will be in AAA.  You can't keep them all.  

The bottom line is, I like all the guys that have passed through waivers better than that list of guys who combined for 500 games at Norfolk and Bowie last year. It is an incremental improvement and the cream will have a chance to rise to the top.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

The bottom line is, I like all the guys that have passed through waivers better than that list of guys who combined for 500 games at Norfolk and Bowie last year. It is an incremental improvement and the cream will have a chance to rise to the top.

We have Bannon and McCoy who should be at Norfolk along with Martin.  They aren't going to have room for all these guys at Norfolk anyway you slice it.  I guess you could put some of them at Bowie.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, atomic said:

We have Bannon and McCoy who should be at Norfolk along with Martin.  They aren't going to have room for all these guys at Norfolk anyway you slice it.  I guess you could put some of them at Bowie.  

I am looking at 9 spots at AA (Second, Third, Short, Utility Infield), AAA (Second, Third, Short, Utility Infield), and MLB (utility infield).

There are basically seven somewhat interesting players in contention for those 9 spots: 

1. Velazquez

2. Urena

3. Herrera

4. Martin

5. Bannon

6. McCoy

7. Valaika

Beyond that, they have Angelo Mora, Jomar Reyes, Willy Yahn, and Malquin Canelo to compete for the other two spots. You could include Stevie Wilkerson in the mix too, but he is more of a 4th outfielder/DH type that might play the occasional second base.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Before the lockdown and half of the season being gone, right? Hard to image, not readdressing things.  
    • IMO, Boras is just one of the parts that is wrong with the current MLB. Yes, he is supposed to fight for his clients and get the most for them. But, I think there is enough evidence that points him as being self serving for his own agenda and his client advice is not always in their best interest.  
    • They did that in March. What the owners want to do now is get a bailout from the players because they don't like the deal they agreed to in March.
    • Scott Boras drops in with his (unsolicited? Unwanted?) opinion.
    • Usually, the two sides present their side of things, each one tilted towards what they want. But realistic people understand, that its a give and take and come up with a compromise so that each side can declare they win. These two sides, dont appear to have that intellectual properties to accomplish this.  
    • No.  He should be.  If you're going to put in a guy like Kirby Puckett who's career was cut short then you have to look at Belle. The differences here are that everyone loved Puckett and he had glaucoma.  Everyone hated Belle and he had a bad hip.  Glaucoma and loss of eyesight in a guy that everyone loves gets sympathy.  A bad hip on a guy that everyone hates gets ignored. Puckett:  .318/.360/.477 for an .837 OPS, 124 OPS+  51.1 WAR.  2,304 hits, 207 homers, 1085 RBI in 7,244 at bats.  Pretty confident that if he played out his career he'd have gotten 3,000 hits.  Also worth mentioning his 6 Gold Gloves.   Belle:  .295/.369/.564 for a .933 OPS, 144 OPS+ 40.1 WAR.  1,726 hits, 381 homers, 1,239 RBI in 5,853 at bats.  Pretty confident that if he played out his career he would have passed 500 homers, maybe approached 600. Belle had 1,391 less at bats and trailed only by 11 WAR.  If I'm doing my math correctly, had Belle been able to have an equal number of at bats, he would have slightly exceeded Puckett's value.   But Belle was a bad guy, threw baseballs at people, terrorized trick or treaters, was surly and didn't like the press.  So the press took joy in letting him drop off the ballot.  Don't get me wrong, I understand it and I'm not saying Belle is a shoe-in by any stretch.  But I feel like there have been less deserving players who have stayed on the ballot longer.  If Belle was an angel, he'd have a different legacy, IMO.
    • The two options are to (1) pay the players to play what you have agreed to pay them in front of no fans or (2) cancel the season. Logically, the only way that paying the players becomes economically infeasible is if it is cheaper to cancel the season completely. Economic feasibility isn't based on maximizing profitability or minimizing losses to the owners by modifying the other portions of the agreement. It is based on the difference between those two binary choices.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...