Jump to content
weams

NEW 60 GAME Proposal [Baseball is Back!]

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, backwardsk said:

Why do the owners believe the players have a legit grievance claim that they need them to waive the right to file it?

You don't think an illegitimate grievance claim could do damage?

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You don't think an illegitimate grievance claim could do damage?

To the players, yes.  To the owners, I’d see it as a chip on their side (in public opinion) for the next CBA negotiations.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, backwardsk said:

Why do the owners believe the players have a legit grievance claim that they need them to waive the right to file it?

Legit or not, it'd be another black eye and be an expense the owners would rather not have to worry about.  From my understanding, some on the players side are chomping at the bit for a 'deal' to finally be worked out so they can file a grievance.  Why should the owners agree to such a deal with MLBPA without an understanding that further litigation won't take place?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, OrioleDog said:

It will be interesting to see if 16 playoff teams ever gets put down once it is picked up for this emergency.

Curious to see if it will end up as simple as 15 x 4 in your division?  

Assume travel prohibits a balanced schedule, but if there were interdivisional play among AL and NL clubs, I'd be tempted to say at a 60-game season, do it pre-divisional old school and just have a World Series.  The Dodgers would ruin that over 162, but somebody could perhaps keep up for 60.  Give ESPN and/or MLB a national game all September - I'd love to get to see if ratings over 10-14 intense days building up to "The Giants Win The Pennant" could beat Best of 3 and Best of 5 stuff between the Yankees and Rangers.

The answer is no. In the most recent proposal it’s good for 2020 and 2021. You can bet that means it’s coming in the next CBA. Baseball is soon to change. The playoff structure will look more like the NBA’s and NHL’s, where better than 50% of the league gets in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The players said "just give us full prorated salaries and tell us when and where".

Clark and Manfred FINALLY got together face to face and figured that out. Now the players still aren't happy. Seems to me like they are moving the goal line. Come on!

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/15/2020 at 5:22 PM, BohKnowsBmore said:

I don’t think that’s a fair portrayal that keeps opinion out of it at all. Maybe literally accurate, but definitely skewed to make one side look better. Could easily add, “but we can sue you if any of us get sick” to the end of the players’ supposed position statement if one wants to play that game. 

if this is truly the sticking point, I think it's time to get back to baseball. If you're a player and you choose to play, you need to accept the risk and not hold a potential class-action lawsuit over MLB. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it appears Manfred is using this pandemic as an opportunity to force in the DH and put advertisements on players jerseys.  He seems pretty shady. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, atomic said:

So it appears Manfred is using this pandemic as an opportunity to force in the DH and put advertisements on players jerseys.  He seems pretty shady. 

Interesting. I completely missed this. Was this in the latest negotiated proposal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, atomic said:

I almost got hit in the head with a ball walking on Eutaw Street in 2018 with Tilman pitching.

 

I have to laugh at that. 😛 Not because you almost got hit but because Eutaw St. was most definitely a danger zone when Tillman was on the mound!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, backwardsk said:

Why do the owners believe the players have a legit grievance claim that they need them to waive the right to file it?

Lawyers in the Hangout, please keep me honest, but I believe that releasing parties from liability (bidirectionally) is a pretty standard component of a settlement regarding a business dispute. Basically, if both parties agree to 60 games as a path forward, one can't sue the other over a breach of contract that resulted directly from them playing 60 games rather than 162.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, bpilktree said:

I would think they want some open days in case a few players get it and they have to move players around from where they are doing extended spring training and come up and fill in.

I would think rainouts would be a consideration too. It wouldn't be out of the norm for a team or two to pile up 4 or 5 rainouts which would be tough to make up in a short schedule.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, scOtt said:

I would think rainouts would be a consideration too. It wouldn't be out of the norm for a team or two to pile up 4 or 5 rainouts which would be tough to make up in a short schedule.

Doubleheaders! 

I wonder if the times of the games would change since there won't be any fans in the stands? I would personally love some more afternoon games, but I digress. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, nevadaO said:

Doubleheaders! 

I wonder if the times of the games would change since there won't be any fans in the stands? I would personally love some more afternoon games, but I digress. 

The idea is to have people watch the games on TV.  People will be working in the afternoon so they won't see the games.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, atomic said:

The idea is to have people watch the games on TV.  People will be working in the afternoon so they won't see the games.  

I get that, but most people don't work on Saturday's but we still have night games. Just curious if they change something like that is all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I thought he looked a lot better than his first outing. He threw some good sliders. I like that he’s not afraid to throw his change up. He was better at locating it in this outing, but it doesn’t appear to be a great pitch to me judging by the hitters reaction to it. I think if he locates it well, it’ll be fine, but he can’t get away with even occasional poor location of it like someone like John Means can because I don’t think his change up is deceptive enough. He was better with his fastball location as well, but the velocity was only 89-91. I was surprised by that since I know he improved his velocity last year and from what I remember he was touching 96 MPH in spring training.    Overall, I was encouraged by what I saw last night. Hopefully, his velocity will be a little better if he gets in another game this year.
    • First Hobgood and now Harvey. We are no longer allowed to draft any pitcher, starting with the letter "H" LOL  
    • Who's this "we," homie?   I agree, it's wise not to speculate on what he's done or not done in the offseasons.  But even there isn't a full season next year and they don't have to pay him the full amount, it's still extremely hard to justify him being on the roster.  I'm sure it's hard to put an actual dollar value on at bats and playing time for younger players that need it to develop, but that's essentially what they'd be doing if they kept Davis on the roster for any reason for any length of time. Except it doesn't have to be that way.  They're spending the money no matter what (I'm assuming they'll have a full season with no fans or limited fans next year) so it's high time that they cut him and let more deserving players have a spot, 162 games or not.
    • Yep.   We will never really know exactly how much work Davis put in compared to what other players do.    So, I choose not to speculate about it.   It’s well past the point where we can hope for some Hail Mary offseason turnaround, the guy is far below a replacement level player, and now we have a lot of guys who need to be in the majors taking the at bats that Davis might take.    The only justification for keeping him is the possibility that a full season won’t be played and we won’t have to pay him the full amount he’s owed.    That’s a complex decision that I can’t comment on very intelligently.    
    • Why not Bannon? He should be up by now anyway.
    • This is where I'm at. My first wish is for Trey to live and love and happy life that is cancer free. Obviously second to this is his return to his previous form as a baseball player, but there is an inherent risk that won't happen. AS Moose pointed out, many athletes have returned to form and we can hope and pray that he does, but more importantly, that Trey will be well long term.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...