Jump to content
Just Regular

Ryan Mountcastle and some 24-year olds

Recommended Posts

With apologies to Means and Santander, Mountcastle's debut was something of a tipping point to me as the first Guy I look to as a durably good contributor to the Next Good Team.   Like me, Hank Aaron and Adley Rutschman, he's a February birthday, and RMC will play his Age 24 season in 2021.   How well he holds up against his fellow 24's these next 6 years (5 if we don't tender final Arb) will somewhat drive how good the team is.

A few very likely superior 24's in 2021 and forever and ever: Devers, Albies, Gleyber, Hiura, Eloy

A group of 9 others: Kyle Tucker, Trent Grisham, Willi Castro, Yordan Alvarez, Victor Robles, Alec Bohm, Ke'Bryan Hayes, Austin Riley, Nick Madrigal

With Mountcastle himself as the 10th guy, where do you peg him in that group?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good topic.    I have to say, that’s a pretty talented crop of position players.    I’d put Alvarez and Bohm at the top of your list of ten.    I’d probably put Tucker next.  Beyond that, it’s a bit of a crapshoot but I think they’ll all be productive major leaguers.    

The draft pedigree is interesting 

Bohm 1:3

Madrigal 1:4

Tucker 1:5

Grisham 1:15

Hayes 1:32

Mountcastle 1:36

Riley 1:41

Alvarez IFA $2 mm bonus

Castro IFA $825 k bonus 

Robles IFA $225 k bonus

FWIW, a typical age cohort will produce 15-20 position players who produce 10+ WAR in their careers.   15 players were listed in the OP.    It would be interesting to look back in 10 years and see how many of these players made that cut, and who made it who’s not on your list.  

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/24/2020 at 11:41 AM, Just Regular said:

A few very likely superior 24's in 2021 and forever and ever: Devers, Albies, Gleyber, Hiura, Eloy

A group of 9 others: Kyle Tucker, Trent Grisham, Willi Castro, Yordan Alvarez, Victor Robles, Alec Bohm, Ke'Bryan Hayes, Austin Riley, Nick Madrigal

With Mountcastle himself as the 10th guy, where do you peg him in that group?

By simple B-Ref WAR, Mountcastle 0.9 was 7th in the group of 10 where I guessed maybe it was a fair fight.

He also beat 3 out of 5 of his "betters" in counting stats, with an Eloy injury assist.    Austin Riley and Kyle Tucker were >2 wins better than anyone else in the group with 6-win seasons.

Alec Bohm's -1.3 WAR group worst.   He was a college slugger I bet our models would have considered, and Dombrowski is going to keep bedazzling that Bryce roster until something gives.    In Fantasyland I'm earmarking Mullins for that Gleyber/Jasson acquisition (perhaps 2021's pleasantest development Elias could place that call just to troll), and Bohm was so bad even Means feels like a lot.   Sports Guy already had it they want to upgrade middle infield, and they have $15M apiece on somewhat stale Segura and Didi.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d like to see Mountcastle work on his defense since know he knows 1B is his home. Heck, maybe even had some more muscle since he doesn’t have to run around LF. 
 

Mountcastle’s defense will improve as the rest of the infield settles in. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I’d like to see Mountcastle work on his defense since know he knows 1B is his home. Heck, maybe even had some more muscle since he doesn’t have to run around LF. 
 

Mountcastle’s defense will improve as the rest of the infield settles in. 

RMC's defense improved significantly over the course of season.  Hopefully the upward trend continues, especially with a full offseason and spring training.  He'll never be a gold glover, but he could someday be considered average at least.

Regarding bulking up, I don't think it would help Ryan much at all anyways.  He's in very good shape, very explosive, and seems very durable with very little injury history.  No need to mess that up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, yark14 said:

RMC's defense improved significantly over the course of season.  Hopefully the upward trend continues, especially with a full offseason and spring training.  He'll never be a gold glover, but he could someday be considered average at least.

Who’s to say he’ll never be a gold glover?   The bar’s not that high.   Both Rtot and Rdrs had him at -1 this year, barely below average.   No reason he can’t improve from there.    

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Frobby said:

Who’s to say he’ll never be a gold glover?   The bar’s not that high.   Both Rtot and Rdrs had him at -1 this year, barely below average.   No reason he can’t improve from there.    

I like the idea of having a former left-side-of-the-infield glove at 1st base. I think he'll get better as the position becomes more second-nature to him. Yes, he was a failed prospect defensively at SS and 3b, but he played at a high enough level there in lower levels to guess that he's got good footwork, mechanics, and athletic ability to do well at 1st. I think his early experience as a 3bman really helped Davis grow into being a good 1bman at his peak, and I have similar hopes for Mountcastle. 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

I like the idea of having a former left-side-of-the-infield glove at 1st base. I think he'll get better as the position becomes more second-nature to him. Yes, he was a failed prospect defensively at SS and 3b, but he played at a high enough level there in lower levels to guess that he's got good footwork, mechanics, and athletic ability to do well at 1st. I think his early experience as a 3bman really helped Davis grow into being a good 1bman at his peak, and I have similar hopes for Mountcastle. 

I’m with you.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sanfran327 said:

I like the idea of having a former left-side-of-the-infield glove at 1st base. I think he'll get better as the position becomes more second-nature to him. Yes, he was a failed prospect defensively at SS and 3b, but he played at a high enough level there in lower levels to guess that he's got good footwork, mechanics, and athletic ability to do well at 1st. I think his early experience as a 3bman really helped Davis grow into being a good 1bman at his peak, and I have similar hopes for Mountcastle. 

Agree. I really think he started to get comfy and confident over there. He made some nice plays, he's going to settle in just fine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really excited about Mountcastle's raw power. I think his peak home run numbers could be really impressive. I think a 45 homer year (or two or three) is a realistic possibility. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Sanfran327 said:

I like the idea of having a former left-side-of-the-infield glove at 1st base. I think he'll get better as the position becomes more second-nature to him. Yes, he was a failed prospect defensively at SS and 3b, but he played at a high enough level there in lower levels to guess that he's got good footwork, mechanics, and athletic ability to do well at 1st. I think his early experience as a 3bman really helped Davis grow into being a good 1bman at his peak, and I have similar hopes for Mountcastle. 

Yep, and that is another reason not to have him unnecessarily bulk up.  Keep him agile for the shifts against righties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, yark14 said:

Yep, and that is another reason not to have him unnecessarily bulk up.  Keep him agile for the shifts against righties.

He's got plenty of power already, but I think you'll see him naturally get bigger and stronger as he enters his physical prime. Just being around a professional sports team and the exercise and nutrition regimens available to him should result in additional muscle. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2021 Orioles Stats

2021 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Marte, who may considered the best CF option via FA, was just signed by the Mets.
    • On the contrary, it is completely true. The team will have ebbs and flows, based on random chance And misfortune such as is happening to Kjested right now, But if you avoid long-term contracts, all of which are stupid, trade your guys at peak value and restock the farm, and there’s no reason why you can’t continually be a positive team. The Cardinals do it and they never have a single digit draft choice they always draft in the high teens, and yet they still have a good team over and over.
    • Going into 2009, Tillman was BA’s no. 22 prospect, Matusz no. 25, Arrieta no. 67.   Britton wasn’t ranked yet but was no. 63 the next year.  Brad Bergesen was the reigning Eastern League pitcher of the year.   David Hernandez had led the league. In strikeouts.   So, it was a more impressive group than your post suggests.   
    • Even worse living with the knowledge that Cardinals owner Bill DeWitt Jr. could have been the Orioles owner all this time, but thanks to Peter Angelos outbidding him it never happened. 
    • Nothing happens til it happens, but can we glean anything meaningful from what the insiders say?   ”Listening to offers” means nothing. Does anyone NOT listen to offers? However, that’s probably indicates less interest than a term like… ”Dangling.” What does that mean? Is GM A calling up GM B and saying,” hey, I got this hot guy, and he can be yours! All I need is XX.” Is GM A being coy and hitting that MAAAAAAYBE he’ll listen…? Regardless, it probably indicates more desire to trade, but maybe not as much as… “Eager to deal” or “seeking the best matchup” which is where GM A is calling up everyone in the Rolodex and saying,” Have I got a deal for you! AND if you ACT NOW…no? Well, how about……etc etc” All  those terms indicate at least partially dealing from a position of “I don’t have to” “I’m in no hurry” “if you don’t, someone else will,” and so on. But pity the guys who… ”Are willing to eat most of the contract…” the fools who rush in, and then find it veeeeery expensive to rush back out.. poor San Diego would be less poor if they hadn’t flung all that cash at Mr Hosmer, but they did, and he has been smiling ever since…and they..” are willing to eat most of his contract” Anyway, where does that leave the Orioles? We’re listening. Sure we are. Everyone listens except your cat in the backyard who doesn’t want to come in yet. We are “dangling”…. That means we’re listening a bit more earnestly, but still it’s our call. Nothing will happen unless it’s very good for the Bmore boys. So let’s see what kind of horse trader Mike is, and what can he bring home in return for the shiny bauble he is dangling…
    • I think we are going to have to get some favorable results from our own young pitchers to improve significantly in 2022. Last year was a bottom 20% outcome in that regard compared to the range of possible outcomes from that group.    If things break the other way in 2022 we could see a lot more wins.   But you can’t just expect that to happen given their performance to date.   
    • I’m happy they’re open to listening to offers.   Obviously, you don’t trade him unless there’s a lot coming back.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...