Jump to content
MijiT88

Mountcastle talk

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

More fired up about his two walks last night than anything else. 

This is absolutely true.  Plate discipline is something this team has truly lacked for…years.   And RMC’s recent ability to take a walk is extremely encouraging!!

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/1/2021 at 10:15 AM, Moose Milligan said:

I'm of the belief (I don't think @Frobbywould agree with me, though, we've had this conversation before) that most award voters are going to heavily factor WAR within their decision making.  

These are national writers that are voting for these guys.  IMO, west coast and central writers who didn't get to see much of RMC could possibly be lazy and just vote for whoever has the highest WAR.  

If RMC somehow ends up with 30+ homers, I think he makes himself a more likely candidate, WAR be damned.  But his terrible start hampered him in this race, big time.

His terrible start/hot finish makes me wonder if he's a slow starter to begin with.  It will be interesting to see how he starts the 2022 season.

Mountcastle will never catch Garcia because of defense. Not a lot of defensive war to be had at DH/1st base.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/1/2021 at 2:15 PM, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I thought Gibbons got hit arms that way from eating spinach. Thanks for ruining it for me. 

feb-2001-jay-gibbons-of-the-baltimore-or

Interesting--I've never met anyone with forearms wider than his face.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He drilled the piss out of that ball.  IMO, looks like he might have put topspin on it, it was on a line and the way it hooked down at the end...made me think there was topspin on it.  Gotta be really strong to do that, that's big boy stuff right there.  

I don't think he can win ROY but 30+ homers and breaking Ripken's rookie record should be do-able.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

He drilled the piss out of that ball.  IMO, looks like he might have put topspin on it, it was on a line and the way it hooked down at the end...made me think there was topspin on it.  Gotta be really strong to do that, that's big boy stuff right there.  

I don't think he can win ROY but 30+ homers and breaking Ripken's rookie record should be do-able.  

I'm picturing a season in which he doesn't have a huge slump and it's pretty exciting.

A 4 win season from a 1B/DH is a lot of fun to watch.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm picturing a season in which he doesn't have a huge slump and it's pretty exciting.

A 4 win season from a 1B/DH is a lot of fun to watch.

I guess the question is whether he will always be a player who is prone to long slumps, or will he be more consistent in the future.   Obviously all players have hot and cold streaks.   Some players are more prone to them than others.   I have a hypothesis — totally unresearched — that players who are relatively unselective and rarely walk are more prone to highs and lows than players who are more selective.  If that’s true, then Mountcastle may have a lot of seasons resembling this one, though even then, I’d expect he can reduce the length of his slumps somewhat by virtue of more experience.   I do recall that in 2019, he was remarkably consistent month to month at Norfolk (low month was .814 OPS, high month was .918).   So, that’s a reason to hope my hypothesis will prove wrong, at least with respect to Mountcastle.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.255/.305/.447 in the first half (104 wRC+)

.289/.344/.599 in the second half (148 wRC+)

It could just be a hot streak, but I'm very excited by what I'm seeing from him. There's nothing unusual about his BABIP or HR/FB in the second half to suggest it's luck. His walk rate is up, K rate is down, and he's just mashing. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I guess the question is whether he will always be a player who is prone to long slumps, or will he be more consistent in the future.   Obviously all players have hot and cold streaks.   Some players are more prone to them than others.   I have a hypothesis — totally unresearched — that players who are relatively unselective and rarely walk are more prone to highs and lows than players who are more selective.  If that’s true, then Mountcastle may have a lot of seasons resembling this one, though even then, I’d expect he can reduce the length of his slumps somewhat by virtue of more experience.   I do recall that in 2019, he was remarkably consistent month to month at Norfolk (low month was .814 OPS, high month was .918).   So, that’s a reason to hope my hypothesis will prove wrong, at least with respect to Mountcastle.

Markakis had a lot of prolonged slumps.  Usually multiple per year and he was a selective guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Markakis had a lot of prolonged slumps.  Usually multiple per year and he was a selective guy.

But his stellar defense in RF didn't slump until he lost footspeed the last two seasons or so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2021 Orioles Stats

2021 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Even though the 60'6" has remained the same since 1893, the distance between the average of pitchers' release points and home plate has decreased because pitchers have gotten, on average, taller and longer-limbed. And the decrease over the past, say, 50 years has been significant. (For the same reason, there's also been an effective increase in the height of the mound.) I've seen some estimates, but I can't recall them right now. Nonetheless, I think it's more likely that the effort to produce the same effect will be made by increasing the number of pitches thrown by a pitcher, for example by limiting the number of pitchers used in a game or the number of pitchers on the 26-man roster. Other sports have been much more willing to change basic rules to improve the game: pro football has moved the goalposts, changed the extra-point and kickoff rules, added overtime, and protected quarterbacks and receivers. Basketball introduced the 3-point field goal, widened the lanes and banned zone defenses. Leagues in other sports haven't held their rules as sacrosanct as MLB. It's not practical for them to change the size of their standardized playing surfaces. There have been some suggestions to raise the baskets, and there's been some experimentation with that. At least some of those showed a drop in outside shooting accuracy and an increase in rebounding and the proportion of scoring by big guys -- not the desired effect.
    • Or they need to run it again in 2 weeks!  Lol
    • https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2021/11/marlins-attempting-to-trade-jorge-alfaro.html Jorge Alfaro would be a good option.
    • They’re certainly both culpable. I just feel so bad for hitters, though. Their eyes are magnets for little specs of dirt floating around right before the pitch. 
    • Beats me, I dunno. It's my hope that teams get back to a slashing style of play...putting pressure on the defense, more balls in play.  I don't know what analytics and metrics would lead a team to believe that's a good idea but it's nice to think about.   It's the one reason I did like the runner on 2nd to start extra innings.  Forced teams to play small ball, move a runner over, etc.  
    • Sure..but there isn’t a magic button that gets pushed when it’s time to contend.  Just because you want to doesn’t mean you will. So, there is no magic formula on when you contend.  However, learning to win, learning from vets, etc…that is important.  That is needed.  The right players can help with that right now. This is why what I have an issue with.  Some of you feel that just because guys are brought up, that it means we are contenders.  It’s not going to work like that, at least it’s not likely that it will. And then what happens when guys struggle, ala 2021.  Do you just keep pushing things back?  At what point do you say enough is enough? Im There now.  2021 was the year I expected to see real progress but then covid hit and that hurt a team like the Os, perhaps more than most teams.  So, I pushed it back to 2022.  There is no money on the roster.  You have Grayson and Adley, amongst others coming up.  You have trade options and FA that can help the team and not break the bank long term.     I don’t agree with it at all but I can understand why some want to wait.  What I don’t get is why people get all up in arms about those that don’t want to wait and then also say signing guys now ruin anything.  When people say that, it makes me think they either don’t understand what is being done here, don’t understand finances or they don’t believe in the players that are in the organization now.
    • Which I know is technically balls in play, but it's not exactly.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...