Jump to content
Roy Firestone

George Sherrill defends "ex teammates"

Recommended Posts

In a L.A. Times column in Los Angeles this morning, Ex Orioles closer George Sherrill took exception to a joke by Times Page 2 columnist T.J. Simers(a mostly tongue and cheek sarcastic style column).

In the column, Simers jokingly told Sherrill that the Orioles were eliminated from contention BEFORE the season began.

To which Sherrill replied(with an apparent expletive)"Those are my ex teammates and friends you are talking about".

He then blew off Simers and ended the interview.

Just thought youd like to know.

If you werent a fan of George in the past...maybe you should be now.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sherrill has never been anything but totally respectful to the Orioles for the opportunity they afforded him and never anything but appreciative of Baltimore fans. He's a class act and it's nice to see that at least one player is willing to go to war for us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But fortunately the Dodgers brought in George Sherrill, a clubhouse loner who likes to come off like Jeff Kent, though lacking seriously in baseball resume and motorcycle magazines.

Lonesome George was upset because he thought I had "blasted" his Baltimore teammates when I said they had been eliminated from contention before the season started.

That's the kind of reaction I'd get from Kent, but only so he could hone his cantankerous skills. Lonesome George, though, was really mad, as if anyone here gives a hoot the Orioles stink.

"Those are my ex-teammates,"

Lonesome said, and even he wanted

everyone to know they were his "ex" teammates.

Lonesome was also peeved because I hadn't "addressed" him properly, beginning with a direct question rather than swapping business cards.

As a result, he called me a very nasty name, and when I asked if that qualified as an obscenity, he said, "what?"

I had to explain to him what an obscenity was, a day earlier explaining "ain't" isn't really the correct word to use -- Kent going to Cal, so in many ways, I guess, these two guys really aren't alike.

I almost miss Kent.

source - L.A. Times

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
source - L.A. Times

"Lonesome" George has been pitching like a beast for the Dodgers. Maybe this hack writer should show a little respect and he'll get some back.

19 IP, 0.47 ERA, 1.264 WHIP

Hope we see you in Baltimore again soon, George.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's really ncie hearing somethign like this from a player that was on the Orioles. We hear the usual "what a poorly run organization" or "no attitude" about the O's.

It's ncie to see this from Sherrill, and he's totally right. This writer sounds like an (insert your favorite expletive here).

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It sucks that media people are so thin skinned.

It sucks that a good amount of media members are like this guy. They are more concerned with making the news than reporting it. Reporters are not supposed to make themselves the story, but too many egos have become inflated and they have to interject themselves into the story. I guess controversy sells, but when you go out of your way to create it, it just makes me ignore you, T.J.

There are still very good sportswriters out there, but you very rarely hear about them, and that is unfortunate. You hear about guys like this that are jumping up and down screaming "Hey, look at me! I am important because I write for a newspaper!"

Whatever. Thanks George, and thanks to people like Roy that do a great job and display credibility and integrity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, let me be the one to look at the other side. Saying the Orioles were out of contention before the season started? Is that really a personal insult to any of the individual players? Maybe the writer was trying to be funny or just trying to compare the entirely different situation that George finds himself in. Going from a non-contender, who no one in the world expected to contend, to a real contender. Hey, it's great that George wants to defend his ex-teammates. On the other hand, do you think it's possible that George overreacted just a bit there? I don't know the writer but my assumption would be that it wasn't his intention to insult the Orioles but to point out the contrast of pitching in the spring for a non-contender to pitching in September with a playoff bound team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kudos to George. If you took a poll of LA sports fans on whether to keep George or Simers, Simers would be on the way out, IMO.

If you took a poll whether to keep T.J. or cockroaches, Simers would probably also be sent packing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, let me be the one to look at the other side. Saying the Orioles were out of contention before the season started? Is that really a personal insult to any of the individual players? Maybe the writer was trying to be funny or just trying to compare the entirely different situation that George finds himself in. Going from a non-contender, who no one in the world expected to contend, to a real contender. Hey, it's great that George wants to defend his ex-teammates. On the other hand, do you think it's possible that George overreacted just a bit there? I don't know the writer but my assumption would be that it wasn't his intention to insult the Orioles but to point out the contrast of pitching in the spring for a non-contender to pitching in September with a playoff bound team.

I don't disagree with you, but I think it was a little bush league for Simers to write a column about the encounter with Sherrill. Something like that should have stayed between them IMO. Just my two cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
source - L.A. Times

All I have to say is WOW. Some people can really be immature little twerps. This guy is a loser.

Anyone seen real reporting on Sherrill's interactions in the clubhouse? I can't get over how childish that reporter came off. How can you compare someone to Kent, a well-documented bad clubhouse guy, after one incident? Unbelievable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't disagree with you, but I think it was a little bush league for Simers to write a column about the encounter with Sherrill. Something like that should have stayed between them IMO. Just my two cents.

I agree with this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • It seems like that the only possible way that the O’s (or most teams for that matter) can compete is by building an elite farm system.  Given how hard and how slow that process is, I wanted to ask the O’s experts on here a few simple question for discussion:   1. how long would you estimate that it takes for a team to go from a mediocre/poor farm system, to a system that has produced enough major league talent to win in the AL east?  Additionally, how long in your opinion does the pro club need to suck while building the farm. 2. is there a team that you would prefer that the O’s model their approach after?  Is it Tampa?  Toronto? St. Louis?  I think the Tampa model is the most brutally efficient, but I can’t see many people truly being happy with that model in the long haul (getting rid of good players while value is high, rarely spending a dollar in FA). 3. do you like the financial model of baseball as opposed to other professional leagues?  Baseball has always been my favorite sport, but it really seems to favor the larger market teams in the end.  Not that smaller market teams can’t compete, it’s just that every year it seems the larger market teams win.  I know there are some poor large market orgs, but I personally get disinterested when I see how imbalanced the competitive landscape can be at times.  
    • Same chance of getting you a championship in 2022.
    • o   lllllllllllllllllllllll. (vs. MARINERS, 12:35 PM)       llllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll        llllllllllllllllllllll.l (vs. MARINERS, 4:05 PM)     llllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll    o
    • Contracts like Davis really hurts the game overall more than it hurts the individual team. Typically teams that have a bad contract just pick up and move on from the player...meanwhile the fans hold a grudge towards the player. Baltimore is doing a disservice to the game by not releasing him and moving on.
    • Yikes. Here's what the O's gave up in 24 hrs.:     WAR, 1991 ff.     Finley        43.5     Harnisch    17.6     Schilling    80.2     Tettleton    17.9     Total lost: 159.2 Davis        0.2     Robinson    -0.6     Total gained: -0.4         Total, net: 159.6 10 yrs    16 WAR/yr.     16 yrs.    10 WAR/yr.    
    • My wife and I went to Sunday's game with another couple and had a great time. A couple observations: - Bottom line up front is that I'd very much encourage folks to go. We've been relatively cautious during Covid, but really at no point felt cramped or uncomfortable. Certainly some of that is that now most of the folks I was with were fully vaccinated, but there's plenty of space in between seats and really not that many people. Even coming into the stadium and in concession lines, people were generally respectful of distance and it was no issue. I'm sure, anecdotally, there will always be someone messing up, but it wasn't an issue for us. Just wanted to start with that context for those that harbor understandable apprehensions, acknowledging everyone has different circumstances/risk perceptions. - Definitely make sure you read the modified regulations before you go - the issue with purses and parking, as some folks noted above, are definitely present. You've just got to be aware of them and plan (my wife switched out her purse just before leaving the house, and my friend's wife had a borderline-sized purse that got waved through after a little negotiation). I can't speak for parking, as we just did a garage on Pratt. - Mobile ticketing and electronic payments were all fully in use, so do recommend just coming prepared. If you're comfortable with using them, it's no issue, but understand some people aren't as tech savvy. Just a pretty minor planning factor. - Regarding masks, most people were good about wearing them, though clearly some of that slipped when people were sitting at their seats. I did see a few times where ushers enforced the masking at your seat rule, but it didn't seem overly draconian (it wasn't that if your beer left your lips for more than two seconds and your mask wasn't up, ushers would descend on you). Those patrons I observed were mostly compliant when directed (except the stray Phillies fan who decided to be difficult). Although I know some folks aren't crazy about it, to be honest, I've been at work every day for the last year wearing a mask the entire time for 8+ hours, so I'm not especially sympathetic. Little bit of a pain, but won't kill ya for a couple hours. - As others have stated, most but not all concessions appeared to be open. Prices did feel a touch on the steep side, but I'd bet they're comparable to what they were in 2019. The O's clearly haven't moved to the Ravens modified pricing. - Lastly, the bar scene before the game was of course quite different than normal, but still very workable and pleasant. Pickles, Sliders, etc have taken over huge spaces in front of their buildings, with plentiful tables well-spaced out. We got to Sliders at maybe 11:45 before a 1 o'clock game on a Sunday, and we had no issue getting a table. Again, overall would recommend folks go, if you're comfortable. I'll tell you it was absolutely great to get back out there and do something normal after having been cooped up for so long.
    • One last thought. When the reserve clause died in court and all players could become free agents every year, the players union was smart and agreed to a service requirement. It was good for salaries and good for the sport to control supply/demand, even if it seemed like a giveaway by the players. If there was a non-performance clause built into free agent contracts that gave some level of relief to owners, it would benefit salaries and the sport. Small to mid size teams would have more ability to chase top talent because the affect of a bad contract would be less calamitous to their limited payroll means if it was discounted by some percentage for non-performance. Ask Scott Boras if he’d rather have three teams bidding for his client or six. Our very own Albert Belle contract made insuring contracts fairly cost prohibitive (though it kinda seems like we’re keeping Davis on the roster for some reason other than insanity). But that practice of insuring contracts showed that there’s more money to spend on players if you give owners some level of protection from disaster contracts like Davis. Owners used to pay huge amounts to insure contracts before they became cost prohibitive. So if it’s good for competitiveness by allowing smaller teams to be more aggressive, and it’s good for player salaries, and it’s good for owners by protecting their investments, by what principle is a player entitled to the full value of a contract that they have essentially defaulted on for non-performance? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...