Jump to content

Orioles and Baseball

Talking O's and Baseball

Forums

  1. Read Forum

    Orioles Talk

    Anything Orioles
    1,133,121
    posts
  2. Read Forum

    Minors

    Talking Minor Leagues
    72,020
    posts
  3. Read Forum

    Plus Members Exclusive Scouting Reports and Content

    For Plus Members only: Special major and minor league news and content including exclusive scouting reports and quotes from players, coaches, scouts, and front office people.
    2,799
    posts
  4. Read Forum

    Game Threads

    Discuss the game
    675,911
    posts
  5. Read Forum

    O's Amateur Draft Talk

    All Amateur draft talk
    40,744
    posts
  6. Read Forum

    MLB

    Talk baseball
    128,919
    posts

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Woah woah woah there. Just wanted clarification.    
    • I disagree strongly that the O’s should be spending much more money on payroll during the rebuild.     I’m happy with the approach Elias is taking.    
    • I guess you have to characterize what represents an "opportunity" I would suggest that it is possible to reach a point where divesting yourself of existing talent in exchange for restocking future talent makes sense. Our farm system was a virtual desert. Largely because we leveraged the future for the now a few times too many. Whether you agree with the approach or not, a rebuild cycle is a pretty common strategy in pro sports.  Sell off today... accumulate and develop young talent, and then begin adding strategic pieces as your young talent matures. Spending a boatload of FA money now... without the bolus of young talent to build around would be contrary to the aims of that approach. And it would make less of that money available when you actually want it. You don't have to agree with the approach.. but I think it's a little disingenuous to suggest that people who are in agreement with the approach are gullible rubes who "buy into" a deception. Or that the people executing the strategy are acting in bad faith. Why not just say "I think it's a bad strategy"? What attack it's proponents? I don't get it.
    • The idea that they have people buying into the idea that’s it’s ok to not spend money and let opportunities go by them is very sad.   And yes, their idiotic decision making is why this team was so for so long.  That is all part of how horrible they are.
    • Yes. Should have been more explicit. Why spend money on ML players until some critical mass is within reach? And hopefully then there will be a time to ease that limitation.
×
×
  • Create New...