Jump to content

Game Threads

Discuss the game

1,902 topics in this forum

  1. vs. BLUE JAYS, 9/24 1 2 3 4 7

    • 104 replies
    • 2,576 views
  2. vs. BLUE JAYS, 9/23 1 2 3 4 12

    • 171 replies
    • 4,618 views
    • 34 replies
    • 1,368 views
  3. vs. MARINERS, 9/21 1 2 3 4 9

    • 125 replies
    • 4,338 views
  4. vs. MARINERS, 9/20 1 2 3 4 8

    • 115 replies
    • 2,702 views
  5. vs. BLUE JAYS, 9/19 1 2 3 4

    • 47 replies
    • 1,915 views
    • 159 replies
    • 3,986 views
  6. vs. BLUE JAYS, 9/17 1 2 3 4 15

    • 210 replies
    • 4,930 views
  7. vs. TIGERS, 9/16 1 2

    • 17 replies
    • 1,237 views
  8. vs. TIGERS, 9/15 1 2

    • 23 replies
    • 1,321 views
  9. vs. TIGERS, 9/14 1 2 3 4 9

    • 127 replies
    • 4,553 views
  10. vs. TIGERS, 9/13 1 2 3 4 5

    • 62 replies
    • 1,721 views
    • 95 replies
    • 2,238 views
  11. vs. DODGERS, 9/11 1 2 3 4 6

    • 88 replies
    • 1,666 views
  12. vs. DODGERS, 9/10 1 2 3 4

    • 49 replies
    • 1,279 views

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I am very happy Elias is here. I think he was the right man for the job and we are in a good place.  Keep in mind though Brian Graham who was a Buck guy, ran the minor leagues. He wasn’t even hired by Dan.  I think our player development is in a much better place now. Odds are they would not have been as good with Dan. That said it was never his show to run. It was a mess.  
    • What he is suppose to say? The owner wanted me to cut salary and this is only way to acccomplish that? Of course he is going to downplay it.  
    • Its an interesting list but I wonder how many were developed well under Duquette.  The knock on Dan is not the drafting but the development.   Mancini developed under Dan.  Brady gets some credit for working with Trey.  Hader was traded early so not developed with the O's.  Guasman may have been rushed.  Could have been better than he was with the O's. Means wasn't much of a prospect under Dan.  It was Holt that helped him with the change which helped him have a good year in 2019.  They say you can't mess up the good ones but Dan certainly tried. Keeping Mouncastle at SS/3B for too long.    Scott is coming around under Elias' team. I like Dan and love the team he built in a short time after he joined the O's.  But player development of minor leaguers was not his strong suit.   He had a knack for acquiring players at the major league level and making a team into a winner.  And that is not a bad thing.
    • We drafted Donnie Hart? I thought we got him from Ny. Meanwhile, quite a trip down memory lane. Yes, overall not a bad job. Meanwhile, it’s also worth mentioning that Buck/ Dan didn’t consider Yaz worth even a cup of coffee on one of history’s worst teams, and he now has the leading WAR on the Giants, and Walker  was a gift for the D-Backs. That’s ok, though. It will be interesting to see what the others add to the list.
    • Of course they were about money, but that was slightly different. Matusz and Webb were,“Give us a token non-prospect and we’ll give you a draft pick...oh, and a declining player with a small salary, whom you can release the next day.” I think the Webb pick was somewhere in the 70s, but the Matusz pick was ~20 picks sooner. I don’t remember Dans exact comments about the value of the picks, but they were dismissive. At a time when we’d lost several picks because of signing QA guys, those picks had value.
×
×
  • Create New...