Jump to content

FanSince88

Limited Posting Member
  • Content Count

    1,247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

118 High-A

About FanSince88

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. TL;DR: The 2020 class is deep with no clear-cut front-runner, and the Orioles have more to gain by their existing players getting better and finding success than getting the #1 pick instead of #2 in 2020 (or #2 instead of #3). https://www.camdenchat.com/2019/8/7/20757690/mlb-baltimore-orioles-detroit-tigers-mlb-draft-2020-mike-elias
  2. How do you know we are the ones who asked for Villar? Seems more likely the Brewers offered him because they wanted to make space for Schoop. Bad call on their part.
  3. Yeah, this. In hindsight, I give this trade a B for Baltimore and a B+ for Atlanta. Gausman helped them win the division last year.
  4. The Braves have all but clinched a playoff spot this year but they were in a tight playoff race at last year's deadline. Gausman's marginal value was worth much more to them last year in the context of a tight playoff race than his ineptitude has "hurt" them year where they've run away with the division anyway.
  5. Gausman was worth 1 WAR last year for the Braves, and -1 WAR this year for them. So from strictly the ATL and BAL point of view, it basically boils down to a double salary dump and some meh prospects for us, in exchange for a 2 month rental for the Braves of an above-average starting pitcher performance. This year was a bust and Atlanta cut bait on him, so you kind of just write it off. Hence, in hindsight, what looked to me at the time like a C- kind of trade for Baltimore sort of looks like a solid B. Still wish we had pressed for better prospects, though, even if it meant we had to keep O'Day. Not sure what all that salary dump really does for us, given that we already have one of the lowest payrolls in the league. It's not like we're looking to make any splashy FA signings this offseason (or, let's be honest, not likely the following offseason either).
  6. Pretty sure Villar is a solid MLB asset, regardless of what you think of him. He's maybe not quite good enough to start for a playoff contender, but good enough to be a bench guy just about anywhere. Too bad the defensive metrics weren't kind to him this year, that could have really depressed his value. His bat and speed are fine, though, for a middle infielder. There's still time to deal him. And he's way, way better than anyone else we could be playing at second or short right now in our system.
  7. This isn't the end of the world. No rush to trade any of these guys right now. Still can get a deal done in the offseason without losing a whole lot of trade value for any of them. Villar now becomes a one-year rental, but it looks like not many people were interested in him this deadline anyway. Maybe an important middle infielder gets injured sometime in the next year and a desperate contender gives us a useful nugget or two for him.
  8. I'll say this -- he seems to have way more to offer than Keon Broxton.
  9. I don't know what exactly people like this author want the Orioles to do. Sure, we could have signed Manny, Harper, Kimbrel, and Keuchel last offseason and still not had the top payroll in the MLB. But what would it have accomplished? It wouldn't have solved the massive, systemic problems with our minor league system and overall talent pool. The Padres have a much better organization that ours right now, and they're still way out of the playoff race even with Machado...they aren't even good enough to be mediocre yet. That's not to say we shouldn't ever sign free agents, but there's a time and a place for that, and now is not that time. Hopefully, Elias will start making strong free agent signings once we start seeing prospects become ready for prime time...with any luck that should be around the winter of 2021. Until then, it's heads-down focus on developing the entire pipeline, not just signing free agents who are close to being past their prime to guaranteed deals. If this author doesn't like that he should maybe put his energy into reforming the service time system. If a team has nobody around big-time free agents to support them, by the time they do get prospects ready to play, the free agents signees will have already started to decline or their contracts will have already expired. It's all about timing.
  10. All of a sudden, the San Francisco Giants are in the thick of the NL wild card race. Everyone assumed they would be sellers (and they still should be! Their team really isn't very good!), but now that they're mathematically in it (ahem, 6% playoff odds), their front office might make the same franchise-killing mistake we made in 2015 and pass on trading their chips at the deadline for a fruitless pursuit of a wild card berth. They've already taken Bumgarner off the table, apparently. The relevance for the Orioles is that the Giants have not one, not two, not three, but FOUR relievers who would be desperately coveted by real contenders who need bullpen help (Smith, Moronta, Watson, and Dyson, and heck even someone might kick the tires on Melancon). If the Giants keep their relievers off the market, that alone will jack the price of relievers up for other sellers. Hence, we should be able to get a good bit more for Givens. Go Giants! And hopefully your front office is a shortsighted as ours was in 2015!
  11. The Vidalin situation is definitely weird and worrisome. But nobody's talking, and until we have some sort of testimony about what really went down there, it's all speculation. Could be as banal as Vidalin got homesick, or could be something much more serious. Without an explanation, though, it's natural for people to jump to the worst conclusion. And unless there is some sort of explanation, speculation is going to run wild.
  12. The fact that he has such a minus glove is way more disappointing than his sub-.500 OPS. I tip my cap to the A's for foreseeing this and leaving him unprotected in the Rule 5. It might not be too early to say that we could have had better results giving someone else a chance -- perhaps even Drew Jackson. Super-frustrating when a putative glove-first guy can't even field well.
  13. What's interesting and a bit ironic is that shortstop is probably the deepest it's ever been across the MLB today. Total OPS for all MLB shortstops is now .770, higher than 2B, CF, and C, only 15 points behind 3B, and only 10 points behind DH (!). The silver lining is that there should be a supply of young SS on other teams who are blocked and/or post-hype prospects that would be an upgrade over Martin both short and long term. I'm thinking about guys like Jorge Mateo on the A's, Myles Straw on the Astros (who's also a CF), or Garrett Hampson on the Rox. Can we pry away any of these guys with a trade package? Probably doubtful, but maybe if their teams get desperate enough. And there should be others hitting the waiver wire who may have more upside and/or a higher floor than Martin. Whether or not we keep Martin, makes sense to explore pre-arb, MLB-ready SS from other sources for next season and beyond, while at the same time trying to stock our low minors with high upside talent. At this point, only 6 weeks from roster expansion, we probably keep Martin and it's probably the right move. Atomic's suggestion of kicking the tires on what it would take to persuade the a's to give him up so we can send him to AAA makes sense, but the terms would probably be too demanding for Elias' liking.
  14. Oh, I didn't know that, thanks for the correction. Then this move from Elias make a lot more sense. Still would have waited a couple weeks to see who gets hurt, but that's a bit of a nitpick I suppose.
  15. I would have waited this out until the end of July or maybe even end of August. Never know who might get hurt between now and then. The guys we got are hardly "can't miss" and hard to believe we wanted them so bad that we couldn't risk losing them to another team or whatever. The biggest thing that bugs me is Cashner made it very clear he didn't want to be traded and we did anyway for next to nothing in return. That's not a great look, and future free agents could use that against us. However, this is hardly a major blunder by Elias, in my opinion. It was a no-brainer to try to move a rental like Cashner, and if this is the best he thinks he could get, so be it. Not a great fan of the return, but castigating Elias for this trade is not going to be my hill to die on.
×
×
  • Create New...