Jump to content


Plus Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

231 Double-A

About jamalshw

  • Rank
    Plus Members since 4/12
  • Birthday 5/13/1987

Personal Information

  • Location
    Winter Garden, FL
  • Interests
    Baseball, Disney
  • Favorite Current Oriole
    Manny Machado
  • Favorite All Time Oriole
    Eddie Murray

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Maybe Ruiz or Martin take a notable step forward? In the OF, I expect one of Stewart or Santander to make some noise and keep himself in the mix in 2021 while the other fails spectacularly. I'm not sure which...and don't really have any concrete reason for believing this. On the mound, could we see someone like Hess or Tate turn things around a put up some quality relief innings to get themselves back on the radar?
  2. It's an interesting point about Nunez. His trade value may jump a bit with more places to play, but I still don't see him as a trade chip to offer too much back outside of a lottery ticket. For me, the biggest players to watch are: Mychal Givens - I think he is the one that can do the most in the season to get traded. He has the stuff to intrigue teams already, if he can pitch well and be "on" for the first month and get dealt for a quality package at the end of August, that would be huge. Austin Hays - I think he's the most interesting piece as he's the one with the most potential upside of those that are likely to get much playing time this year. D.J. Stewart and Anthony Santander - If either one completely falters, they get bypassed by the likes of Mountcastle, Diaz, etc. and they likely lose any chance of being a contributor on this team beyond this year. A mediocre showing keeps them in the mix and a very good two months could elevate them to a spot where one of Mountcastle, Diaz, etc have to prove they can unseat them. Chris Davis - I think a really bad two months makes him someone the front office may finally drop at the end of the year with youngster on the way. With Mancini out and the team likely reluctant to start Mountcastle's clock, Davis could get a lot of playing time. This could be it...unless ST part 1 wasn't a fluke.
  3. In the old days, there wasn't free agency either and the six/seven years service time clock so you could afford to develop a player on the bench, picking and choosing spots to play. Now, that would just leave you with half of their service time left before they go to free agency. For some of our prospects, that may be a viable option, but the younger ones would just be getting into their prime and be gone. I agree having every team in the same boat minimizes the concern for the Orioles specifically, but the O's--along with the other rebuilding teams--are in a position where minors development is a bit more of a focus compared to the contending teams. I would like the idea of having all the minor league players who are willing (not make in mandatory as some may be high-risk or live with high-risk folks), report to one of the local minor league camps (not being used for the taxi squad) and have them play each other. For the taxi squad, I'd have some guys like Diaz, Mountcastle, Kremer, Akin and others who were deemed likely to play this year and play it by ear on whether they are actually added to the roster at any point.
  4. I'm all for hastening the pace, but don't want a clock on the total length. I'm not sure I"m buying the analogy and the best option to hasten the pace would be to enforce the rules rather than just accept that they're ignored. As for your last point, I agree to a point, but I think what I enjoy about baseball is that I don't have to carve out Sunday at 1 p.m. (or whatever time my team is playing that week) from my schedule. Because baseball is played those 20+ hours a week I will have ample opportunity to catch a couple games (and likely parts of a couple more). I'm not sure the intent should be for baseball to try and get everybody to watch every inning of every game. There are, of course, the hardcore fans that will. I was in that group before having kids, but most people as you say have busy schedules, other commitments and other entertainment options. The availability of baseball most everyday for half the year is what I love about it (and sorely miss right now). As you note, it's place is something in the background, but I'd argue it's more than that. It's something that can be consumed live, yet still somewhat on-demand in this very on-demand culture. That, to me, is one of it's greatest appeal. It's a game that I have ample opportunity to watch live giving me that flexibility I need, but also one that when I do watch I can remove myself from the constant clock-watching that I'm otherwise so focused on during my day-to-day life with so much scheduled out.
  5. I don't know how to think about this draft...and I think that makes sense given it was a 5-round draft without much 2020 information available. As such, everyone is gravitating towards "old" data when we know how much a year can change someone's draft status. And I don't tend to look at much college or prep guys until the year of the draft anyway so I don't really know much about any of these players. I think it was an interesting strategy to take with such a high draft pick and some seemingly great options available. But...I'm willing to wait and see.
  6. Call me old school or a traditionalist, but I don't like that at all. I am reluctant about the pitch clock and adding clocks to the game at all, but can accept that as a method of speeding up pace. I'm not sure if total length really makes a huge difference in the excitement level compared to pace. If it's a fun, exciting product I want more of it, not less. I guess in this case maybe there might be "too much of a good thing," but I like the idea of a game not controlled by the clock when so much else in our lives are controlled by it. Now on the idea of a 16-team playoff, I can get behind that for the 2020 season, but also don't want to see that in a "normal" season. I liked the 8-team playoff structure. I'm okay with a 10-team and could, potentially, accept a 12-team (depending on the structure), but I don't want half--or more--or the league making the playoffs. That waters down a regular season. If you're going to do that, why have more than 80 games?
  7. I'm open for allowing trades, but restricting the trading of draft picks to when that pick is on the clock would certainly make for some added drama. The problem would be preventing these deals from leaking beforehand.
  8. It seems the Boston cheating was a lot less defined in the report compared to the Astros. I find it interesting that Cora was key to implementing the cheating in Houston, but went to Boston and didn't bring a similarly robust system with him and had basically no involvement in the cheating that was done. That seems odd to me. Maybe Boston just did a better job coordinating what was presented to the investigation to pin the reply guy as the fall-guy.
  9. I root for storylines. I won't root for anyone other than the Orioles when they play the Orioles, but I do like fun story lines. So, early in the season I don't tend to root for any other team and I don't have any long term (multi-year) rooting interests in teams, but if an underdog team emerges akin to the Orioles and A's in 2012, then I'm onboard for that. I'll casually root for the Angels because I want to see Trout in meaningful games down the stretch and in the postseason.
  10. I'm not sure service time is a consideration for Akin. He's already 25 and not expected to be an elite pitcher. He's a back-end of the rotation/swing-man type. Certainly there is value there during his pre-arb years, but I'm not sure buying that seventh year is relevant. Ultimately, there are things for Akin to do in Triple-A to polish his game and his demotion (to me) was more about keeping the depth. We are going to cycle through a ton of pitchers this year and we will undoubtedly see Akin in 2020.
  11. I wonder if the old regime got into his head after he resigned as a Free Agent. It was clear that the signing was Angelos and not DD and company. I wonder if their biggest concern was health and they communicated that to him when he was signed. It wouldn't surprise me. In any case, it's at least encouraging to think he has a chance (albeit remote) to not be a complete waste of a roster spot even if he's still going to be vastly overpaid. Honestly, I'll be happy if he can get back to being a replacement level player.
  12. Because "doesn't throw well" is relative. Not throwing well in comparison to professional baseball players is much different than in comparison to high schoolers, even down in Florida. He must have been athletic enough to field the position and the arms was good enough to get by against much lesser competition.
  13. I would love to get Mateo and Neuse and give them a shot at 2B and 3B. The problem is, would Givens be enough for them to bite? I know there is a roster crunch concern here, but I'd have to imagine they'd be able to offer this package around and get some interest from other rebuilding teams as well.
  14. I have high hopes for Bannon to be one of those guys that out-performs his rankings. Ideally, he can prove himself as a solid 2B option for a call up should Alberto be able to replicate his success and become a viable trade candidate mid-season or should someone go down to injury though I imagine if he really rakes in Triple-A, he'll get a call up midyear regardless.
  15. I was hoping Wells would be able to get in a couple games and make some big league hitters look bad to have a bit of a mental impression on the staff who may question whether his stuff will play in the big leagues. Hopefully he pitches well in Triple-A to earn a chance later in the year regardless.
  • Create New...