Jump to content

CheeryO

Limited Posting Member
  • Content Count

    631
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by CheeryO


  1. 9 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

    Sorry, read both papers daily for a few decades, and seriously, the Sun has never come close to being a great newspaper ever. But, that is just IMO.

    The POST had great reporters who did go after Nixon.

    But, what have they done in this decade?

    Here are a couple links on the history of the Sun.  Pretty impressive stuff.

    https://www.baltimoresun.com/about/bal-about-sun-sunhistory-htmlstory.html

    https://blogs.weta.org/boundarystones/2019/03/08/when-baltimore-sun-was-washingtons-most-visible-newspaper

    Couple of  tidbits

    The only war correspondent in attendance when the Germans surrendered in Reims, France was a reporter for the Sun.  Similarly, when the Japanese surrendered on the USS Missouri, three reporters for the Sun were there. 

    For awhile one of the tallest privately owned buildings in Washington DC was the Baltimore Sun building, which was built for the newspaper in the 1880s.  The paper did not stay there long, however, because the Sun's owner's death forced his heirs to sell the building.  The building is still there -- though by modern standards it's not even really considered tall.  

    The paper designed a communications network of telegraph, steamboat, railroad and pony express to New Orleans in the 1850s just to report on the Mexican War.  This put the paper on the national stage.

    The paper once had news bureaus in 7 international capitals, including Moscow and Tokyo.  

    David Simon, Louis Rukeyser, HL Mencken, Gwen Ifill and Jim McKay all once worked for the Sun.

    I mostly read the Washington Post as a kid and teen, but if I could you could be damn sure that I would read the Orioles' box score for yesterday's game in the Sun!  I live on the west coast now but don't even read the LA Times much anymore.

    Now most of the great old newspapers are a mere shadow of what they used to be.  The fifth season of The Wire did a great job showing the Sun struggling with the modern era.

     

     

     

    • Upvote 1

  2. 7 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

    He had a solid chance in 96.

    Stupid umpires and that clearly wrong home run call, didnt help.

    Todd Zeile faking a throw and throwing the ball into the ground, sure didn't help.

    Some say the 96 team was all around better team than the 83 World Series winners that won it all.

    I have to admit I barely followed baseball in the 90s.  Even before the strike my attention faded.  Something about the Yankees losing to the D-Backs in 2001 brought my attention back.  I'm biased in favor of the '83 team because I was still a kid then and I was at one of the World Series games (can't remember which one).


  3. 2 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

    Not sure, in this day and age, if there is any such thing as a good newspaper.

    Washington Post has gone so liberal, even before being purchased by Amazon.

    Baltimore Sun, never has been, nor will it every be anything close to a real newspaper.

     

    The Baltimore Sun used to be one of the greatest newspapers in the US, far greater than the Washington Post up until the 70s when the Post stole the spotlight on Watergate.  The Post is no more liberal than it ever has been -- it is the paper that exposed Nixon yet (along with every other paper except the Knight Ridder reporters and foreign press) failed to properly investigate the run-up to the Iraq War.  

    • Upvote 1

  4. 10 hours ago, OFFNY said:

    o

     

    When she was good, she was very good indeed ........ but when she was bad, she was horrid.

     

    I remember seeing this movie when I was in 9th grade, and Nicole Eggert and her mother (Cheryl Ladd) using the Henry Wadsworth Longfellow adage at the beginning of the film.

     

     

    When She Was Bad... (1979)

     

    o

    Image result for deniro gif


  5. If the Orioles had a pitching staff to match their current offense this team maybe could be a bit better than .500 -- best case.  But without studying the numbers it does seem the offense has improved quite a bit over the past couple of months -- despite the presence of Davis and Martin.


  6. 20 hours ago, foxfield said:

    I don't mean to single you out.  I think many here, myself included find the ownership performance under Angelos severely lacking.  But I think this is a little unfair, Angelos is not a wannabe owner, he is a very wealthy man who isn't very good at listening to other people's ideas.  He saved this organization from potentially leaving Baltimore and that alone assures him of a worthwhile legacy.  Yes, it's not enough.  Yes, he has presided over an organization that has sunken from one of the better franchises in sports to one of the worst.  But he has not been without some positive points.  

    Again, I don't mean to single you out.  I cannot wait for new ownership.  But I also fear that if it is not someone with ties to Baltimore...that things can get much worse for us as fans.  

    No problem.  I don't mind being singled out.  But I don't believe Angelos had anything to do with the construction of Camden Yards.  And it's really Camden Yards that ensures there will be Major League Baseball in Baltimore -- not the Angelos family. 

    The city of Baltimore and fans of the Orioles don't owe the Angelos family anything.  In fact, I think any reasonable person understands the terrible state of the Orioles begins and ends with Angelos' mismanagement.  It has nothing to do with the city of Baltimore -- quite the opposite.

     


  7. The Angelos family moving the O's to Nashville might just be what the city of Baltimore needs.  As others have said the Rays would then just move to Baltimore.  It's not like the Angeloses can take Camden Yards with them.  I dare the Angelos family to move to Nashville.  Why fail in a real sports city when you can fail in a fake one?  Is John Angelos a wannabe country singer like his dad is a wannabe owner?  


  8. 21 hours ago, Frobby said:

    Couldn’t care less about the Ravens (though I was a big Colts fan back in the day), root mildly for the Terps but care more about my and my parents alma maters.

    I don't get this attitude toward the Ravens.  I haven't even lived on the east coast since the Ravens moved to Baltimore, yet the for me the Ravens moving there were the most exciting thing to happen to Baltimore since the O's won the '83 World Series.  It was a huge shame when the Colts left, but so often they were nearly as bad as the Orioles are now.  With a team like the Ravens in Baltimore for so long now I find it mystifying anyone misses the Colts.  I love it when the Colts lose now -- hated the Peyton Manning teams.  


  9. O's, Ravens, Terps and Caps

     

    I graduated from UMD, but I was a big Terps fan before I ever thought I would go to school there.  Was an almost equally big Hoyas fan as a kid, but I have a hard time caring much about college sports anymore.  I used to go to Baltimore Colts games as a kid, then I was a big Redskins fan until the Ravens came to town.  Now I don't care about the Skins -- kind of enjoy them losing in the Dan Snyder era actually.  Try to root for the Nats sometimes, but since I've lived in LA a long time I'm also kind of a Dodgers and now a Rams fan too.  A bit of an LA Kings fan too.


  10. 19 hours ago, ORIOLE33 said:

    Means nothing. The Yankees win that series in no more than 5. The Twins are not going into Yankee Stadium and steal a game. I just don’t see it. 

    Why, because the Yankees have been anything but dominant in the postseason for the past decade?  Because the Yankees haven't been to the World Series in 10 years?  The Yankees are very close to being a house of cards.  Take away a brilliant season from DJ LeMahieu and some brilliant starts from some small sample sized youngsters like Urshela and German, and you have a team that gets by mostly on beating up on very weak Orioles and Blue Jays teams, a not quite arrived Rays team and a head case, off-year Red Sox team.  


  11. Just now, JR Oriole said:

    That is correct.  The Twins pose zero challenge to the Yankees.  They literally never beat them, when it counts or when it doesn’t.  Mentally, the Yankees own the Twins.  Check the stats since 2001.

    Since 2001?  This Twins team is clearly different than any other recent Twins teams.


  12. 1 minute ago, ORIOLE33 said:

    I thought we could have won at least one of these games. 

    Astros, you are our last hope.

    Not just the Astros.  The Yanks most likely have to get through the Twins or Indians too -- two very good teams.


  13. 2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

    Some folks here think he's better than Schoop.

    Villar's WAR numbers have been slightly higher than Schoop's for the past two years.  That pesky WAR again.  Schoop will probably always be dogged by inconsistency.  Feel bad for the Brewers.  They traded for the 2017 Schoop and got the 2018 version.


  14. 13 hours ago, OrioleDog said:

    The thing is, we don't really do iBB's as a team anymore (only Astros have fewer this year).

    Tonight tie game, 2 out, man on 3rd, Givens pitched to Trout and struck him out.  Even Thorne and Palmer in the booth started out "no way Trout gets to hit here", then were mildly surprised when we pitched to him.

    Trout has never gotten a hit against Givens.  That's probably why they pitched to him.

×
×
  • Create New...