Jump to content

luismatos4prez

Limited Posting Member
  • Content Count

    1,532
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

157 High-A

About luismatos4prez

  • Rank
    Plus Member Since 10/12
  • Birthday 8/28/1993

Personal Information

  • Favorite Current Oriole
    AJ
  • Favorite All Time Oriole
    Luis Matos, Will Clark, Rick Krivda, Jeff Conine, and Miguel Tejada

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. 2020's version of Alcides Escobar probably. A few years back, Hechavarria got off to a hot start to the year but it was clearly a mirage. In reference to that mirage, some fantasy baseball site posted an article with the headline "Step Away From Adeiny Hechavarria". I always thought that was funny.
  2. Wilkerson is 27 and had a 74 wRC+ last year and Baseball Savant's expected statistics say he was actually very lucky with balls in play. He's so bad. Who cares if he can play a mediocre 2B?
  3. I think option (2) is roughly correct, but exaggerated. I think their main concern is $$, but they'd like Elias to build a winning team too. It would be a nice side benefit to the profitable business they're running.
  4. Peraza, Shaw, Franco, and Hernandez would all be good targets for the infield if no one else offers starting jobs. But maybe they're too expensive for Elias's Tampa-like budget. I'm an offseason junkie, but I can't draw up any excitement after they traded a 4 WAR player for an organizational guy to save money. Trading Bundy, claiming a few Alberto-like lottery tickets, and signing a Dan Straily or two are the only moves I expect.
  5. That number is one. And the level is cash money.
  6. You think most owners are more businessman than baseball fan? It's an interesting question. If you offered the Sons (or another owner) these two choices for the 2020s, which one would they pick: a) Highest profit in the league, huge growth in franchise value, 0 playoff appearances b) Lowest profit in the league, 2 World Series championships
  7. Peraza would be a good addition. I'm ready to be very salty if Villar is just released, still holding out hope that they trade him.
  8. I suppose there's still a chance they trade him before releasing him so maybe I'll withhold my negativity about this for now. I'm not sure how waiving him helps the trade market though.
  9. Completely agree. I am very strongly opposed to this move. I was cautiously optimistic about the Elias and Sons Era. Not anymore. Just embarrassing.
  10. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/has-jonathan-villar-played-himself-out-of-baltimore/ Quote from article: It's unthinkable to me, too. We'll find out in 2 short weeks though.
  11. The 40 man is at 35 right now. I expect Hanhold, Valaika, Wilkerson, Wynns, Smith Jr, Armstrong, and Kline would all pass through waivers, so there isn't any worry about the roster being full. I'm in favor of protecting Mountcastle, Akin, Sedlock, McKenna, Kremer, and Fenter and I expect they'll claim 1 or 2 guys that shake loose from other teams.
  12. Scouting and and infrastructure are all good with me. Non-tendering Villar (or cash-dumping him like Jim Johnson) is a terrible move. He is a valuable piece that teams would love at 1 yr/10M if he were a free agent (just like Schoop last year). They should definitely be able to trade him for a 45-level prospect. If no one is biting, they already have about the lowest payroll in baseball and the financial situation is not so dire that they'd be forced to cut him. They can keep him and try to flip him at the deadline rather than lose him for nothing. But again, they can and should be able to trade him this winter.
  13. I can't imagine why. Unless you're joking. I can never tell. What will they do with that $10M that can't already be done with the tens of millions of dollars they've saved on payroll by now? Maybe I don't know enough about ML budgets. I imagine the team is making a big profit with payroll so low. Is there a good reason (other than pocket-lining) for ownership to set a budget of say $60M?
  14. What benefit does the team get from losing 58 games rather than 62? Rebuilding and tanking are two different things. Trading veterans for prospects is rebuilding. I support that. Non-tendering good ML players so that you lose more games is tanking and I don't support that. It's disrespectful to the game and the fans in my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...