Jump to content

Es4M11

Limited Posting Member
  • Content Count

    758
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

114 High-A

About Es4M11

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday 12/27/1984

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. You saying that it was a bit of a "chad" move (I see you spend time on Reddit) implies something about Kjerstad's character, so yes I would say that is an attempt to slander Kjerstad. The reason you have been called a lot worse on here is because you are generally an ass. Sorry, but I'm not sorry. Apologies to the mods
  2. No, but you do feel qualified to slander him for a fair play -- umpire agreed -- in the field of competition. Got it.
  3. I'll second the other poster. You're wrong
  4. Really? You took offense to that? The defender was clearly in his path back to the bag. I have watched the replay a few times. Kjerstad's job was to get back to the bag, the defender was a step or two in front of the bag, and Kjerstad had to go through him. Give me a break
  5. I like the Kjerstad pick more and more as I watch more of him. The bat in intriguing, and I really like how he hits to all fields with power. If he gets the strikeouts in check, the bat looks very promising. Pretty sure most of us would have been very happy with Torkelson. Well Kjerstad's bat might end being as good, and he plays a more valuable position.
  6. What's a good potential outcome for Kjerstad? Left handed version of Mark Trumbo?
  7. So is this the guy they were saving money for? or they just decided to go cheap at the top?
  8. Not trying to dog Elias and Co. here, just trying to point out to the other poster that just because these guys are thought of as good evaluators, doesn't mean they didn't screw this one up. I'm not saying they did, but to get a guy who was at best thought of as a top 10 guy, when we picked second kinda makes me take pause for a moment. I understand that this may be setting something up at #30, but IMO whghen you;'re picking at the very top, teams shouldn't try to get cute - get the guy who is most likely to make an impact.
  9. I'm not ready to condemn the pick, but these are the same evaluators that blew the Mark Appel and Brady Aiken picks -- that is to say that these guys are not infallible. My initial reaction is that I do not like the pick with who else was available.
  10. That opinion is shared by many. Personally, Martin is #1, but Torkelson is a consolation prize I would be completely happy with. A future middle of the order featuring Mountcastle, Rutschman, and Torkelson could be very formidable. I am okay with either of the pitchers at #2 if that is managements choice. Preference to Hancock - seems like he is being judged pretty harshly because of his first few outings to start the year.
  11. Granted, I am no scout, so take my opinions for what they are worth: nothing. That said, I tend to view Martin, Torkelson, and Hancock as similarly graded prospects. An argument could be made for either one to be considered best player in this class. All three of these players are very acceptable outcomes as far as I am concerned. Personally, Martin has the highest ceiling of all of them. With Martin... + handles the bat well + gets on base, walks a lot + doesn't strike out a lot + has a solid glove that can play multiple positions + good speed That's a lot of quality attributes from a kid straight out of college. And Martin still has a lot of room to grow and add muscle to his frame -- I think the power will come. Martin checks most of the boxes and is exactly the type of player this organization needs -- the type of player we always lament about not having. I get that Hancock (or Lacy, if that's your preference) would be great additions and that the team could ALWAYS use more pitching, but Martin is worth bypassing the arms this year. When you factor in the volatility of pitching, give me the guy that plays every day. Just my $.02
  12. I don't think the Orioles draft a pitcher at top of round 1. Of course it can be said that a team never has enough pitching prospects, but the Orioles have a few right now and are sorely in need of some positional prospects. And Austin may be the best player in this draft, period. Most scouting reports seem to think Martin will be a quality defender at either 2b or 3b. Personally, I am sticking Martin at 2b and not thinking about it again until we know if Henderson is the 3b of the future or not. If Henderson doesn't pan out then Martin offers some flexibility. In short, stick Martin at 2b and keep building up the middle. Taking Torkelson over Hancock as well. Torkelson seems like the most sure thing and is arguably the best player in the draft. A potential future middle of the order featuring Mountcastle, Rutschman, and Torkelson could end up being pretty potent -- supplement with Hays and Diaz for added flavor.
×
×
  • Create New...