Jump to content
Sports Guy

ACCT thread

Recommended Posts

I'm sure many of you knew this but I didn't...

Maryland's victory in 2004 is the only time that someone other than Duke or UNC have won the tourney since 1997!!!

That is crazy. Wake Forest won in 1996 led by Tim Duncan.

Quite a show of dominance from the big 2 over the last decade plus. Time for the rest of the league to pick up their game, hopefully with MD leading the charge. NC State looks to be heading in the right direction. The main programs that need to get going are Wake and Georgia Tech, IMO. I realize they both have new coaches but those programs should be better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Expansion really has hurt this league, and it really shows with the crowd on this first day..Granted, teams like Wake & BC are just atrocious which lead to two blowouts this afternoon, but back in the day, the ACC tourney was always packed.

But will the expansion of adding Pitt and Cuse help it? Bringing in 2 very good teams(at least normally).

On Day 1, you didn't have Duke and UNC playing...that is a big factor.

I want to go one year though...it is always a great tourney.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the ACC has really become an unbalanced league. Even though I'm a Duke fan, I vastly preferred it when every team in the league was highly competitive.

That said, I'll be watching tonight and the rest of the weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm sure many of you knew this but I didn't...

Maryland's victory in 2004 is the only time that someone other than Duke or UNC have won the tourney since 1997!!!

That is crazy. Wake Forest won in 1996 led by Tim Duncan.

Quite a show of dominance from the big 2 over the last decade plus. Time for the rest of the league to pick up their game, hopefully with MD leading the charge. NC State looks to be heading in the right direction. The main programs that need to get going are Wake and Georgia Tech, IMO. I realize they both have new coaches but those programs should be better.

Think about this...Since 1999, there have been 13 ACCT played.

Duke has won 10 of those 13. They had a stretch of 5 in a row, 2 in a row and now 3 in a row.

That's absurd to win that many ACCT in that time period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Think about this...Since 1999, there have been 13 ACCT played.

Duke has won 10 of those 13. They had a stretch of 5 in a row, 2 in a row and now 3 in a row.

That's absurd to win that many ACCT in that time period.

No doubt, it has been an impressive run for Duke.

Though like I say, it really has been a down period for the league. Some of these other programs need to get their butts in gear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No doubt, it has been an impressive run for Duke.

Though like I say, it really has been a down period for the league. Some of these other programs need to get their butts in gear.

I think its heading in that direction.

I said for years that I felt a big reason that MD was so good is because Gary was better than most of the coaches in the league.

For a long time, I felt the coaching in the ACC was poor...speaking in general here.

Well, I think its getting better.

Couple that with teams getting new facilities(UVA and NC St recently, GT next year) and now new teams coming into the conference that have good BBall programs and I think that the conference is going to get a lot better.

There are 6 or 7 ACC schools in the top 25 recruiting classes for next year...and one of those schools is NOT Duke, at least not yet(they are in on some big time, unsigned recruits right now).

You also see some of the bottom feeders like Wake and BC that are very young and have good long term upside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think its heading in that direction.

I said for years that I felt a big reason that MD was so good is because Gary was better than most of the coaches in the league.

For a long time, I felt the coaching in the ACC was poor...speaking in general here.

Well, I think its getting better.

Couple that with teams getting new facilities(UVA and NC St recently, GT next year) and now new teams coming into the conference that have good BBall programs and I think that the conference is going to get a lot better.

There are 6 or 7 ACC schools in the top 25 recruiting classes for next year...and one of those schools is NOT Duke, at least not yet(they are in on some big time, unsigned recruits right now).

You also see some of the bottom feeders like Wake and BC that are very young and have good long term upside.

I think this is the only reason to be excited about the future of the ACC. There are just so many middling teams. The conference really needs someone like GT, Wake or MD to step back up. JMO, but I don't see UVA or NCSU really improving much on what they already are. FSU is solid, but how long will that last.

I'm probably a little more down that most, b/c I'm a Wake fan and they don't have much of a bright future at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think this is the only reason to be excited about the future of the ACC. There are just so many middling teams. The conference really needs someone like GT, Wake or MD to step back up. JMO, but I don't see UVA or NCSU really improving much on what they already are. FSU is solid, but how long will that last.

I'm probably a little more down that most, b/c I'm a Wake fan and they don't have much of a bright future at all.

Nc State has a top recruiting class coming in. If Leslie stays, they are going to be very good next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nc State has a top recruiting class coming in. If Leslie stays, they are going to be very good next year.

Yeah, after I wrote that I went to Rivals website and saw all the guys they have coming in. Hopefully for them, that is sustainable. I'm not exactly sold on Gottfried for the long haul though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was very pleased with Duke's win against VT last night. The big men avoided any hint of foul trouble, Hairston played a pretty good game taking up some of Kelly's usual minutes, and Duke took it inside on a day where the three-pointers weren't falling. They played a really good defensive game and made VT take a lot of off-balanced, rushed shots. The game was pretty close, but Duke seemed to have it in control the entire second half.

Big test today against the big men of FSU.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was very pleased with Duke's win against VT last night. The big men avoided any hint of foul trouble, Hairston played a pretty good game taking up some of Kelly's usual minutes, and Duke took it inside on a day where the three-pointers weren't falling. They played a really good defensive game and made VT take a lot of off-balanced, rushed shots. The game was pretty close, but Duke seemed to have it in control the entire second half.

Big test today against the big men of FSU.

Today's game is a game where you miss Kelly.

Hopefully Duke can find a way to beat them because if they do, they may get a #1 seed regardless of what happens tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

c

Duke and North Carolina have their work cut out for them in today's ACC semi-final games with Florida State and North Carolina State, respectively. They'll each need to play sound, fundamental basketball against these 2 stubborn teams to set up a re-match of last season's ACC Championship Game, in which Duke manhandled the Tar Heels. In that game, the Blue Devils took a 14-point lead at halftime before coasting to a decisive, 17-point victory to claim the crown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • Imagine the possibilities if Macphail was allowed to trade draft picks. I hope that’s in the new CBA. 
    • I saw these lists on MLBTR and thought I hope @Luke-OH has some info on these guys. Thanks.   
    • Hopefully the Astros are forced to fire this guy and he can quietly take a role with us. 
    • I think it’s more of the “I’ll believe it when I see it” mentality.  Right now we have $2.5 million just chilling. Ready for us to spend it.  This is how you prevent 14 straight years of losing. Our last winning year was 2016. I don’t think we sniff winning till 2023 with the state of our pitching staff. That’s 7 years and half way there.  We spent our full draft pull money this year. Seems odd we keep having this international pool money left over. Odd or... maybe some of that old philosophy is still lingering. 
    • I haven't looked at the position players, but there are a number of pitchers on that list who are interesting.  From a simple performance based analysis, Juan Minaya 29yo with 128 innings of 3.93 ERA ball in the majors. It's nothing exciting, but he's been a solid middle reliever. He's also tinkered with his offspeed/breaking pitches a bit and there may be some potential improvements in pitch mix/selection.  Chasen Shreve 29yo with 203 innings of 3.71 ERA ball in the majors. He was stuck in AAA this year because of the strength of the Cardinals bullpen, where he had a 3.45 ERA, a full 2.4 runs under the league average 5.85 ERA. His FIP numbers aren't good, but he's one of those few guys who consistently beats his FIP numbers.  An interesting spin rate dude, Dan Winkler Of 600 pitchers who threw 50 of more 4S fastballs in 2019, Winkler had the 15th highest RPM/MPH on his fastball. There is evidence that he's not using the pitch as well as he could, locating primarily middle of the zone and down, exactly where a high spin fastball plays poorly. Winkler is also only a year removed from a strong year as an important part of the Braves bullpen. He's only 29 years old.  Finally, a guy who is probably the riskiest of the group, but has serious stuff but has never put it together, Bryan Mitchell He's coming off a lost year, but at his best he averaged almost 95mph as a SP and added a 90mph cutter, and nasty high spin curveball. He should miss bats, but he doesn't. He's also battled some injuries. If he's healthy, he's the type of guy you sell the opportunity of the wide open O's pitching staff and you see if you can't make some tweaks to get him on track. He's 28 years old.         
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...