Jump to content
avdeuph

Davis didn't get bigger, he got better

Recommended Posts

I'm sure I speak for many of us when I say that the increasing frequency of PED talk surrounding Davis is getting bothersome. More importantly, if it reaches a fever pitch, we will probably start worrying about distraction from the team effort, a concern which may or may not be valid.

So in my opinion, here's the one thing that should be repeated to all media members and fans who are talking about Davis and PEDs (p.s., a performance-enhancing drug doesn't possess anything y'all)...

Davis got better, not bigger.

If he had recently begun juicing, I think the first expectation would be the prototypical body change...thickness, head size, etc. Well, Davis is thick for sure, but he hasn't changed.

Which leaves, instead...

He is in the first year of the generally-accepted prime age for baseball players.

He is comfortable and confident in our system.

On TOP of that, he simply got a little better. Lest we forget the possibility, players work every year to get the most out of their skills and the least from their faults.

Combine those three things and you have the great hitter we've got now. PEDs unnecessary for reconciliation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's very unlikely that his improvement from 2012 to 2013 is related to PED's. He was built like an oak tree when I saw him up close in January 2012 at Fanfest. Now, whether he already was on PED's then, or still is, will always be a subject of speculation. I hope not, but I've learned that there's just no way for a fan to judge this, and most fans aren't objective about whether the players on their own teamwould do such a thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm sure I speak for many of us when I say that the increasing frequency of PED talk surrounding Davis is getting bothersome. More importantly, if it reaches a fever pitch, we will probably start worrying about distraction from the team effort, a concern which may or may not be valid.

So in my opinion, here's the one thing that should be repeated to all media members and fans who are talking about Davis and PEDs (p.s., a performance-enhancing drug doesn't possess anything y'all)...

Davis got better, not bigger.

If he had recently begun juicing, I think the first expectation would be the prototypical body change...thickness, head size, etc. Well, Davis is thick for sure, but he hasn't changed.

Which leaves, instead...

He is in the first year of the generally-accepted prime age for baseball players.

He is comfortable and confident in our system.

On TOP of that, he simply got a little better. Lest we forget the possibility, players work every year to get the most out of their skills and the least from their faults.

Combine those three things and you have the great hitter we've got now. PEDs unnecessary for reconciliation.

Well there will always think some player is cheating. It goes with the territory. It

is sad. Just the way it is unfortunately. IMO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe Chris was juicing when he was 15 and 16. Maybe the effects just kicked in. Sure does appear to have the backne in any of the championship belt photo's I've seen. Hardy says he's too busy for Ping Pong. He is always lifting. Seems to be a a kind, calm, and caring individual. Not an egotistical, rage prone guy like Bautista.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well there will always think some player is cheating. It goes with the territory. It

is sad. Just the way it is unfortunately. IMO

I understand that, and I'm sure there have been some O's fans on the other side more than a few times.

Main point: the physical signs aren't there. If he is taking PEDs, then he's been taking them for years, in which case, the results this year probably have nothing to do with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it's very unlikely that his improvement from 2012 to 2013 is related to PED's. He was built like an oak tree when I saw him up close in January 2012 at Fanfest. Now, whether he already was on PED's then, or still is, will always be a subject of speculation. I hope not, but I've learned that there's just no way for a fan to judge this, and most fans aren't objective about whether the players on their own teamwould do such a thing.

As usual, this is the most reasonable post so far. I don't expect anything better than this to come. It's highly doubtful he just started taking PED's in the last year or two. That doesn't mean he wasn't on them already for some time. I want to believe he is clean and has always been. Since he's on my team that's what I choose to believe until there is some good reason to believe otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always been a PED skeptic. In that I don't think they matter all that much in terms of player performance. Or at least, the effects are overblown in comparison to all other modern player advantages that no one questions (personal trainers, home gyms, protein shakes, whey, youtube videos on training, etc.). I didn't care that Bonds (what bothered me about Bonds was he decided being a one dimensional player was more valuable than being a 5 tool player) probably used, I didn't care that McGwire allegedly did either. It wouldn't bother me about Davis.

Now, that said, PEDs do not effect decision making and vision. To the extent that steroids and HGH work, they turn fly ball outs into home runs. They don't make you take a walk on a 3-2 count instead of swinging at a pitch in the dirt for strike 3. They don't make you go the other way with a pitch instead of trying to pull everything. They aren't magic. The reason Davis is doing better this year is he has more patience and a better approach at the plate. PEDs do not help you with that. If they did, McGwire wouldn't have fanned 155 times in 1998. And Sosa wouldn't have led the league in strikeouts from 1997-99...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just saying, a drastic change in physical appearance is not required for someone to be taking steroids/HGH. Size is not always indicative of strength.

Look at Ryan Braun (allegedly) or Luis Gonzalez (allegedly).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've always been a PED skeptic. In that I don't think they matter all that much in terms of player performance. Or at least, the effects are overblown in comparison to all other modern player advantages that no one questions (personal trainers, home gyms, protein shakes, whey, youtube videos on training, etc.). I didn't care that Bonds (what bothered me about Bonds was he decided being a one dimensional player was more valuable than being a 5 tool player) probably used, I didn't care that McGwire allegedly did either. It wouldn't bother me about Davis.

Now, that said, PEDs do not effect decision making and vision. To the extent that steroids and HGH work, they turn fly ball outs into home runs. They don't make you take a walk on a 3-2 count instead of swinging at a pitch in the dirt for strike 3. They don't make you go the other way with a pitch instead of trying to pull everything. They aren't magic. The reason Davis is doing better this year is he has more patience and a better approach at the plate. PEDs do not help you with that. If they did, McGwire wouldn't have fanned 155 times in 1998. And Sosa wouldn't have led the league in strikeouts from 1997-99...

How anyone can look at Barry Bonds career pre and post steroids (according to all reports) and say they don't matter much in player performance, is remarkable. Bonds went from a Hall of Fame outfielder to the best hitter in the history of baseball in his mid to late 30's. That is remarkable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I understand that, and I'm sure there have been some O's fans on the other side more than a few times.

Main point: the physical signs aren't there. If he is taking PEDs, then he's been taking them for years, in which case, the results this year probably have nothing to do with them.

You can't go by this. There have been many, many major and minor league players that have been caught by testing or outed in investigations that didn't have "physical signs" that they were taking steroids. Not all PED users undergo dramatic physical transformations.

I certainly hope that Davis is not a PED user. I believe him when he says "no", so I believe that he is not a user. But I wanted to believe Lance Armstrong too. Too many athletes have been caught or outed for me not to have a somewhat jaded opinion of all of them. That's just the cost of the "steroid" era. That said, I personally willing to totally forget about PED's and enjoy Davis' year. Unfortunately PED's will continue to be discussed with regards to Davis because he is built like the Incredibly Hulk and his performance to date in 2013 is an outlier. If the discussion of this by bloggers, "media", and the like bothers you, then my advice is to learn to ignore it or otherwise deal with it. I don't mean that snarky at all...the "discussion" of it will continue because that is the realistic sports world that we live in now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can't go by this. There have been many, many major and minor league players that have been caught by testing or outed in investigations that didn't have "physical signs" that they were taking steroids. Not all PED users undergo dramatic physical transformations.

I certainly hope that Davis is not a PED user. I believe him when he says "no", so I believe that he is not a user. But I wanted to believe Lance Armstrong too. Too many athletes have been caught or outed for me not to have a somewhat jaded opinion of all of them. That's just the cost of the "steroid" era. That said, I personally willing to totally forget about PED's and enjoy Davis' year. Unfortunately PED's will continue to be discussed with regards to Davis because he is built like the Incredibly Hulk and his performance to date in 2013 is an outlier. If the discussion of this by bloggers, "media", and the like bothers you, then my advice is to learn to ignore it or otherwise deal with it. I don't mean that snarky at all...the "discussion" of it will continue because that is the realistic sports world that we live in now.

"Incredible", not "Incredibly"!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How anyone can look at Barry Bonds career pre and post steroids (according to all reports) and say they don't matter much in player performance, is remarkable. Bonds went from a Hall of Fame outfielder to the best hitter in the history of baseball in his mid to late 30's. That is remarkable.

They don't matter in comparison to general hitter advantages today. I see no philosophical difference between using a PED and training better. If Babe Ruth had a home gym and a personal trainer, maybe he hits over 1,000 home runs. That doesn't even take into account ball park dimensions. Maybe if Bonds played at the Polo Grounds instead of AT&T Park he hits 100 fewer homers.

There are other things at play beyond PED usage that explain the rise in homeruns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can't go by this. There have been many, many major and minor league players that have been caught by testing or outed in investigations that didn't have "physical signs" that they were taking steroids. Not all PED users undergo dramatic physical transformations.

I certainly hope that Davis is not a PED user. I believe him when he says "no", so I believe that he is not a user. But I wanted to believe Lance Armstrong too. Too many athletes have been caught or outed for me not to have a somewhat jaded opinion of all of them. That's just the cost of the "steroid" era. That said, I personally willing to totally forget about PED's and enjoy Davis' year. Unfortunately PED's will continue to be discussed with regards to Davis because he is built like the Incredibly Hulk and his performance to date in 2013 is an outlier. If the discussion of this by bloggers, "media", and the like bothers you, then my advice is to learn to ignore it or otherwise deal with it. I don't mean that snarky at all...the "discussion" of it will continue because that is the realistic sports world that we live in now.

There was a lot of smoke (anecdotal evidence) surrounding Armstrong. I have seen nothing at all on Davis. No trainer linked to PED's, name not connected to any doctors who supply, no huge physical change (McGwire/Sosa/Bonds) that we know of. Of course, I haven't seen photos of Davis from college.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






×
×
  • Create New...